The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-21-2016, 03:54 AM
Linde Linde is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 16
Default larrivee OM-40 vs OM-40R

Unfortunately, I have not the possibility to play on the guitars as there are no dealers near my residence, so the new guitar must be purchased online.

Which of the two would you recommend. Have heard them online and thought OM-40 sounds a little bit more muddy than the OM-40R.

Do not dare to completely rely on the sampled audio I have heard so have you heard them and can give your opinion I will be very grateful.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-21-2016, 06:35 AM
rokdog49 rokdog49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 13,545
Default

Contact Don or Marty at Wildwood Music and ask them their opinion.
Open today at noon.

740-622-4224
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-21-2016, 06:42 AM
Muffinhead Muffinhead is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Winston Salem, NC
Posts: 1,205
Default

I have the OM-40R and I love it. It is warm and woody with excellent tone and sustain and beautiful overtones that do not overwhelm. But that is my own personal preference.

Either way you will be getting an excellent, world class guitar that is well built with fit and finish second to none and tone worthy of a guitar costing 2-3X as much.

There is a Larrivee forum on the web where you can also get some opinions from. Many AGF members are also Larrivee Forum members.

BTW, welcome to the AGF forum. I am sure you will like it here.
__________________
"Your green eyes they don't miss a thing,
they hold me like the sun going down,
warm me like a fire in the night, without a sound."

Kate Wolf

Epiphone Hummingbird Studio
Martin 000-10e
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-21-2016, 07:41 AM
Woodstock School Of Music Woodstock School Of Music is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Woodstock Illinois
Posts: 1,229
Default

I can't imagine a OM-40 being muddy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-21-2016, 07:53 AM
Shoreline Music Shoreline Music is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 1,423
Default

Both are excellent (and our bestselling guitars of 2015). I tend to prefer the mahogany, but among our customers who play them both in the shop, it's an even split between that and the rosewood. The good news is, you can't go wrong



__________________
Shoreline Music
• The world's oldest online music store
• 2015, 2016, 2018 NAMM Finalist / Best Online Store
• AGF-only discounts
Free Shipping + Free Returns
Shoreline Rewards
Videos
• Guitars from Taylor | Mcilroy | Larrivee
• Stage gear from K&K | Fire-Eye

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/07...s/namm_x_6.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-21-2016, 08:04 AM
Lacks Focus Lacks Focus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoreline Music View Post
Both are excellent (and our bestselling guitars of 2015). I tend to prefer the mahogany, but among our customers who play them both in the shop, it's an even split between that and the rosewood. The good news is, you can't go wrong
I would agree, if the 40 series brings the same qualities to the OM as it has to the D. I absolutely love my D-40R. If I didn't already have my M-38, I'd probably be looking into one of the OM-40Rs (I know they're not the same size and shape, but for my purposes they're close enough).
__________________
Craig

1977 Martin M-38
1982 Stelling Staghorn
2013 Larrivée D-40R
2014 Andrew White Eos 1011 (sold)
2016 Pisgah Possum
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-21-2016, 08:08 AM
JohnCambo JohnCambo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 279
Default

I played them back to back a couple of weeks ago and while similar, I preferred the rosewood, that's just my opinion.

I found the mahogany is crisper with more mids and the rosewood to have more bass and overtones, slightly scooped but not really.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-21-2016, 08:10 AM
ewalling ewalling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 20,772
Default

For the OP, I'm just curious - what attracted you to the 40 series as opposed to the original 03s, 05s, and 09s?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-21-2016, 08:58 AM
Dru Edwards Dru Edwards is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 43,433
Default

Hi Linde, Welcome to the AGF. I'm surprised that the mahogany sounded a little muddy but that could be due to strings or the recording chain. It's a difficult decision to make and I've only played the OM-40 (or was it the D-40) so I was unable to compare the two.

I like the way Shoreline Music put it (and they're an AGF Sponsor too):
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoreline Music View Post
Both are excellent (and our bestselling guitars of 2015). I tend to prefer the mahogany, but among our customers who play them both in the shop, it's an even split between that and the rosewood. The good news is, you can't go wrong

<<snippet videos>>
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-21-2016, 09:01 AM
TheJackal TheJackal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 506
Default

If it were me, I'd grab the OM-40 with the Austrian Spruce top at Shoreline Music. I have that model that I bought at Gruhn. It's outstanding. Plenty of clarity, tone, and range.
__________________
Martins, Taylors, Larrivees (L-05, L-04, D-03R, O-09, OM-40, OM-40R, SD-50), Yamahas, Godins, Gretsch, Horabe, et al
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-21-2016, 10:06 AM
AcousticDreams AcousticDreams is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,110
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJackal View Post
If it were me, I'd grab the OM-40 with the Austrian Spruce top at Shoreline Music. I have that model that I bought at Gruhn. It's outstanding. Plenty of clarity, tone, and range.
I would like to second the Austrian-Moonwood spruce for the Larrivee...it is a couple of hundred dollars more....but the sound difference is sparkling. Helped a friend get one...we played two of these...and they are magnificent. The Moonwood adds a bit more dimension to the sound and really cuts through.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-21-2016, 10:34 AM
Mycroft Mycroft is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 7,174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Linde View Post
Unfortunately, I have not the possibility to play on the guitars as there are no dealers near my residence, so the new guitar must be purchased online.

Which of the two would you recommend. Have heard them online and thought OM-40 sounds a little bit more muddy than the OM-40R.

Do not dare to completely rely on the sampled audio I have heard so have you heard them and can give your opinion I will be very grateful.

Thanks!
Do you have a preference for Mahogany or Rosewood backed guitars?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-21-2016, 03:22 PM
Petty1818 Petty1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,582
Default

I have luckily had a chance to try both OM-40 and D-40 models so I will try to share my thoughts. The downside is that this was over eight months ago. For some reason Canadian dealers in my area never have the 40 models in stock. For such an iconic Canadian builder, it's a bit disappointing. I see them pop up used on kijiji though so someone must be selling them.

Anyway, I am not a big Mahogany guy, except for what it does on a Gibson J-45 or Martin D-18. I just find that in most cases it's a bit too bright for my tastes. However, I preferred it on both the D-40 and OM-40. It seemed to add a bit of clarity to both models, which helped them to project more. The notes also seemed to pop a bit more. With that said, all four guitars I tried had older strings so I might think differently with a set of new strings. I would love to try them a bit more though and see if they are for me. They could be great stage guitars.

The only things I dislike about the 40 models is the narrow nut width for the dreadnought versions, the satin finish and the fact that they don't project as well as I had hoped. You kind of need to dig in to get the notes to pop. However, this seems to be a Larrivee thing in general. I also found the action to be a bit high but that's easily fixed.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-21-2016, 07:02 PM
Rogerblair Rogerblair is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,597
Default

I have the OM40, and highly recommend it. Jean Larrivee works MAGIC with mahogany. Pretty incredible guitars at a very reasonable price point. The new bracing pattern is a winner.

Roger
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-22-2016, 05:33 AM
Lacks Focus Lacks Focus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petty1818 View Post
The only things I dislike about the 40 models is the narrow nut width for the dreadnought versions, the satin finish and the fact that they don't project as well as I had hoped. You kind of need to dig in to get the notes to pop. However, this seems to be a Larrivee thing in general. I also found the action to be a bit high but that's easily fixed.
I've run across one D-40R that was that way. The three others I've played (including my own) were just the opposite - some of the "liveliest" guitars I've ever played, and very responsive. I'm not questioning your experience, because, as I said, I've seen that myself, but only in the minority of the small sample I've tried.
__________________
Craig

1977 Martin M-38
1982 Stelling Staghorn
2013 Larrivée D-40R
2014 Andrew White Eos 1011 (sold)
2016 Pisgah Possum
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Tags
larrivee om-40






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=