The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-02-2001, 12:09 PM
John G. John G. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: rocky mountains
Posts: 174
Post bone nut/saddle on a Taylor?

Long time lurker, first time poster.
Has anyone here replaced the tusq saddle or the stock nut with bone? If so, how did it affect sustain, projection, tone?
My 712 w/ englemann top sustains great but I am wondering if I might get a bit more volume out of it with bone? Thanks! John
__________________
Be the person your dog thinks you are.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-02-2001, 09:28 PM
CTTaylor CTTaylor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 15
Post

For what it's worth, I did what you're asking about two weeks ago, with mixed results.

I have two Taylors, an 814-B (Legends of the Fall, Englemann, Brazilian rosewood) and a 2000 W-14-C. I ordered two saddle blanks from First Quality Musical Supplies (www.fqms.com), part number GA3WPC. These are compensated bone saddles that only require a small amount of sanding to drop in and directly replace the stock Tusq saddle.

I replaced the W-14-C saddle first (took about 3 minutes to sand and fit). Re-tuned using the same strings and SHAZAM! The guitar's sound, which was excellent before, improved by about 40%. It's louder, has a longer sustain time, more bass, better mid-range, etc etc etc. It's a dramatic improvement that's the best $5.98 I've ever spent. I'm still amazed every time I play it.

I did the 814-B a few days later. Put in the new saddle, re-tuned the same strings and played. The change was not good. The sustain dropped off quite a bit and the tone was much darker (sounded like dead strings). I put the original saddle back in and again re-tuned with the same strings. The original tone of the guitar was back.

The overall change to the W-14 was about as good as the change to the 814 was bad.

Hope this helps. Just try it - it might make a big difference. The saddles from FQMS let you do the change yourself with minimal effort.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-02-2001, 10:49 PM
Speakout Speakout is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Colo Springs, CO USA
Posts: 123
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by CTTaylor:
<STRONG> I ordered two saddle blanks from First Quality Musical Supplies (www.fqms.com), part number GA3WPC. These are compensated bone saddles that only require a small amount of sanding to drop in and directly replace the stock Tusq saddle.</STRONG>
Any idea as to what radius the new saddles are cut to?

Thanks,

Brad
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-03-2001, 02:57 AM
cpmusic's Avatar
cpmusic cpmusic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 10,967
Post

I never knew you could buy pre-cut bone saddles until just recently, so I did it the hard way. It takes a bit of work (slow and careful is the key) but on the plus side, I get an almost exact replica of the saddle that came with the guitar.

Anyway, I've replaced the saddles on all my acoustics with bone, and had good to excellent results in nearly all cases. This includes my 615, Tacoma EM9, Guild Mark I classical, Fender Redondo(!), and Baby-M.

My 615 pre-dates Tusq, so I was replacing Micarta, and I got a little more brightness and volume, but mostly more clarity. Interestingly, when Taylor gave it a new bridge in the 90s, the Tusq saddle they dropped in just didn't make the grade; the tone sounded like it had been clamped down or muffled a bit. To their considerable credit, they graciously took the guitar back and replaced the the Tusq with bone, gratis!

About the only guitar on which it didn't make much difference was my Baby-M (I had an extra blank, so what the heck). I don't hear much difference, but while I was at it, I adjusted the compensation profile for the low E and A strings, and that helped intonation on those strings.

Chris

[ 09-03-2001: Message edited by: cpmusic ]
__________________
Chris
We all do better when we all do better.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-03-2001, 02:27 PM
gmccall gmccall is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 480
Post

Hi,

Ummmm, not to change the subject, but I replaced the bridge pins on my 810B with jewelers brass pins and it was beneficial.

Maybe a little more punch, a little more sustain. At lease the strings appear to sound better longer.

I wish I had the money for Mamoth Tusk bridge pins.

I was also gonna go to a bone saddle on my 810B but according to above, now I don't know...

Later,
Grm

[ 09-03-2001: Message edited by: gmccall ]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-05-2001, 08:12 AM
CTTaylor CTTaylor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 15
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Speakout:
<STRONG>

Any idea as to what radius the new saddles are cut to?

Thanks,

Brad</STRONG>
The saddle from FQMS looks like a direct replacement for the stock Tusq. Same radius, same everything. All you need to do is round the corners a bit and take about four passes on a sheet of sandpaper for thickness and it should pop right in.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-05-2001, 12:23 PM
JayGon JayGon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rochester, MA, USA
Posts: 587
Post

CTTaylor,

WHy do you suppose you got such a different result with the two Taylors? Did it have to do with the tonewoods? The shapes (GA) are identical except for the cutaway, right?

Jay
__________________
JayGon

Gibson J45 1942 Banner Reissue Custom Shop
Gibson Advanced Jumbo Custom Shop
Martin HD-28
Martin OM-28
Martin 00-15M
Fender Tele Highway One Reissue
Fender Jazz Bass
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-05-2001, 09:18 PM
CTTaylor CTTaylor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 15
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by JayGon:
<STRONG>CTTaylor,

WHy do you suppose you got such a different result with the two Taylors? Did it have to do with the tonewoods? The shapes (GA) are identical except for the cutaway, right?

Jay</STRONG>
Jay -
I don't really know. I was hoping someone else could shed some light. Yes, the body shapes are the same, except for the cutaway. I don't what caused the difference, I only know what my ears told me. I suppose it has to do with the wood combination differences. I doubt if the cutaway makes a difference.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-06-2001, 02:05 PM
slw slw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 43
Post

I just ordered a bone saddle from FQMS and plan to put it on my 714ce. I'll let you know how it goes.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-06-2001, 03:52 PM
JayGon JayGon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rochester, MA, USA
Posts: 587
Post

That would be great. I would consider it on my 714 as well.

Jay
__________________
JayGon

Gibson J45 1942 Banner Reissue Custom Shop
Gibson Advanced Jumbo Custom Shop
Martin HD-28
Martin OM-28
Martin 00-15M
Fender Tele Highway One Reissue
Fender Jazz Bass
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-10-2001, 04:19 PM
slw slw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 43
Post

Well I’ve installed the bone saddle I got from FQMS this weekend in my 714ce. I was amazed how it came cut in almost the identical shape of the Taylor compensated tusq saddle. The results were excellent. I experienced more clarity, sustain, and projection in the sound after it was installed. It’s hard for me to quantify the degree or percentage of improvement, but it’s definitely there.

Had to sand down the height, corners, and the thickness slightly to get it to fit into the slot. Besides breaking a nanoweb G and E string in the process, it was a piece of cake and well worth the $5.98 plus shipping.

I would say that replacement to a bone saddle should be standard practice. If it doesn’t give you the results you want (see previous posts here) you can always put back the original saddle at no risk, with the exception maybe of a couple of broken strings. The excellent results for me were worth the time and marginal cost. It's hard to believe that replacing such a little part/piece of the guitar can make that much improvement to the sound and tone of a Taylor, as if it needed any more improvement!

Next stop, maybe a bone nut, but installed by a luthier/repair person. Replacing that one is beyond my ability and comfort level.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-10-2001, 09:36 PM
Iwant355 Iwant355 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 69
Post

Think I could order a saddle large enough for my 555?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-17-2001, 04:03 PM
SG SG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Marlborough Ct.
Posts: 54
Post

CTTaylor - Could it be that maybe the saddles
were not the same quality. In my research one of the problems with bone is that is can be inconsistent. SG
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-17-2001, 08:05 PM
CTTaylor CTTaylor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 15
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by SG:
<STRONG>CTTaylor - Could it be that maybe the saddles
were not the same quality. In my research one of the problems with bone is that is can be inconsistent. SG</STRONG>
I should have made this clear in my earlier posts . . .

I actually ordered three of the new saddles, figuring I would be using two and keeping one as a spare. I thought that one saddle might be less dense than the other, so I tried two different ones on the 814-B. Same results.

Thanks for pointing that out.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-01-2001, 12:05 PM
John G. John G. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: rocky mountains
Posts: 174
Post

A follow-up to my own post. While my 712 was back at Taylor for a neck warranty fix I had them put on a bone saddle. It seems mostly favorable but not as dramatic as I would have hoped. On the plus sides there is definitely more volume and the guitar takes a strum a bit better. Single notes have more of a fatness to them and the bass is a smidge more developed. Sustain seems about the same, possibly a bit better. The only loss has been a bit of the high end shimmer, which the tusq seemed to have. My opinion is based on only playing this saddle for a few days so I might feel different in a month. The only downside is that it is more expensive to have Taylor do it. If you are getting the saddle at FQMS for six bucks then it is no big deal. JG
__________________
Be the person your dog thinks you are.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=