The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 09-14-2020, 07:16 AM
PappyVanWinkle PappyVanWinkle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 75
Default

My last guitar purchase involved a similar decision for an adi/hog dread - the E10D vs the BR-140a. I ultimately went with the BR for a few reasons:

1. Fretboard radius was noticably larger/flatter - I couldn't get on with the curvature of the Eastman's fretboard.
2. I was, at least in the back of my mind, chasing the D-18 tone and the BR got closer to that for me.

I've been very happy with the BR, it's been great for the money. Things I don't like about BR's:

1. The poly finish. Everything's poly'd. It looks like the whole guitar was dipped in poly - back of the neck, entire headstock, the neck joint is covered with finish, etc.
2. The vintage top's color does not look good IMO. I made sure to get the normal top without the vintage toner.
3. The pickguards but that's an easy fix.
__________________
Martin OM-28
Martin D-18
Blueridge BR-140A

Last edited by PappyVanWinkle; 09-14-2020 at 09:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-14-2020, 09:28 AM
Pura Vida's Avatar
Pura Vida Pura Vida is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Sacramento, CA & Tamarindo, Costa Rica
Posts: 3,878
Default

Totally agreed with PvW's assessment. BR's bracing and voicing are closer to the Martin sound than Eastman. And the Poly finish and (possible) aging toner color can turn some people away (like myself). BR's necks are flatter, while Eastman's are fuller (matter of preference).
__________________
"It's only castles burning." - Neil Young
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-14-2020, 09:35 AM
Andromeda Andromeda is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canandaigua NY
Posts: 14,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pura Vida View Post
Totally agreed with PvW's assessment. BR's bracing and voicing are closer to the Martin sound than Eastman. And the Poly finish and (possible) aging toner color can turn some people away (like myself). BR's necks are flatter, while Eastman's are fuller (matter of preference).
How would you describe the Eastman’s tone or what would you compare it to?
__________________
Liam F. 👽🖖🏼👑 🎶
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-14-2020, 09:36 AM
PappyVanWinkle PappyVanWinkle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 75
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andromeda View Post
How would you describe the Eastman’s tone or what would you compare it to?
A comparison you see thrown around fairly often is Blueridge/Martin, Eastman/Collings.

Just remember you're not buying an exact replica of either so you'll hear your own differences and have your own preferences.
__________________
Martin OM-28
Martin D-18
Blueridge BR-140A
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-14-2020, 10:10 AM
Andromeda Andromeda is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canandaigua NY
Posts: 14,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PappyVanWinkle View Post
A comparison you see thrown around fairly often is Blueridge/Martin, Eastman/Collings.

Just remember you're not buying an exact replica of either so you'll hear your own differences and have your own preferences.
Thanks. I love the Collings tone so that is another factor easing me toward the E40D.
__________________
Liam F. 👽🖖🏼👑 🎶
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 09-14-2020, 10:30 AM
Fred Fred is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,840
Default

I know from my experience that Eastman's quality/craftsmanship is really good. I don't think Blueridge matches it.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-14-2020, 10:45 AM
BoneDigger's Avatar
BoneDigger BoneDigger is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Tyler, TX
Posts: 7,262
Default

I have owned a few Blueridge guitars and still own one (BR160-12 12 string). I also own three Eastman guitars as well, including an e10D. Honestly, they are all nice guitars.

I have played the two models you are considering and they are indeed great guitars. I think it really comes down to tonal preference. If you want a more Martin like sound, go with the Blueridge. The e40D that I played was a spectacular guitar in most ways. At this point, given the option, I would likely go for the Eastman, but the Blueridge is no slouch either.

Of course,there are other options in the ~$2000 price range to consider. A used D18 or D28 is possible, as are a number of different options from Taylor or Gibson. However, the e40D that I played was quite a nice instrument!
__________________
https://www.mcmakinmusic.com
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-14-2020, 11:32 AM
taylorgtr taylorgtr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andromeda View Post
Both of these models have almost identical specs and esthetics and even their prices are very close...has anyone played both models and is one “better” than the other?

I don’t belong to photobucket so I couldn’t post pics...sorry.
I haven't played Blueridge, but I love my Eastman E40-OM. I would love for Blueridge to come out with a limited run model called "BR-549".

__________________
--------
Recording King Bakersfield
Taylor 812ce-N
Taylor 356ce
Taylor 514ce
Taylor Baby-M
Eastman E40-OM

Fender Robert Cray Stratocaster
Fender Baja Telecaster
Fender MIJ Telecaster Custom
G&L ASAT Classic Tribute Bluesboy Semi-Hollow
Rickenbacker 620/12
Gretsch 6120
Godin Multiac Nylon Duet Ambience
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-14-2020, 02:42 PM
Pura Vida's Avatar
Pura Vida Pura Vida is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Sacramento, CA & Tamarindo, Costa Rica
Posts: 3,878
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PappyVanWinkle View Post
A comparison you see thrown around fairly often is Blueridge/Martin, Eastman/Collings.

Just remember you're not buying an exact replica of either so you'll hear your own differences and have your own preferences.
The balance and clarity definitely lend itself closer to Collings than Martin, but Eastman has its own sound. Always a nice shimmer on top too.
__________________
"It's only castles burning." - Neil Young
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-14-2020, 06:01 PM
merlin666 merlin666 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Canada Prairies
Posts: 2,957
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PappyVanWinkle View Post
A comparison you see thrown around fairly often is Blueridge/Martin, Eastman/Collings.

Just remember you're not buying an exact replica of either so you'll hear your own differences and have your own preferences.
That is just silly. I assume you can compare Eastman-Bourgeois to Collings and BR to Made in Mexico Martin. Comparison should be in the same class and although they are instruments for the serious Amateur with a good home studio and paying weekend gigs they are getting close to Pro level instruments like MiJ Takamine or Yamaha that are not much more expensive. Comparison could also be with entry level Larrivee but those are very nice.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-15-2020, 06:56 AM
PappyVanWinkle PappyVanWinkle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 75
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merlin666 View Post
That is just silly. I assume you can compare Eastman-Bourgeois to Collings and BR to Made in Mexico Martin. Comparison should be in the same class and although they are instruments for the serious Amateur with a good home studio and paying weekend gigs they are getting close to Pro level instruments like MiJ Takamine or Yamaha that are not much more expensive. Comparison could also be with entry level Larrivee but those are very nice.
Not meant to be a comparison of build quality, craftsmanship, materials, etc. The point is that when you have 4 makers building a dread with the same tonewoods and bracing style, then it's possible to determine that Blueridge shares more tonal similarities with Martin, and Eastman shares more tonal similarities with Collings. It was be just as fair to say a $100 plywood no-name guitar sounds more tonally similar to a Collings than a Martin.
__________________
Martin OM-28
Martin D-18
Blueridge BR-140A

Last edited by PappyVanWinkle; 09-15-2020 at 07:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-15-2020, 08:36 AM
Andromeda Andromeda is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canandaigua NY
Posts: 14,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pura Vida View Post
The balance and clarity definitely lend itself closer to Collings than Martin, but Eastman has its own sound. Always a nice shimmer on top too.
Would you say the Eastman is closer to a Taylor like tone?
__________________
Liam F. 👽🖖🏼👑 🎶
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-15-2020, 09:31 AM
Pura Vida's Avatar
Pura Vida Pura Vida is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Sacramento, CA & Tamarindo, Costa Rica
Posts: 3,878
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andromeda View Post
Would you say the Eastman is closer to a Taylor like tone?
No, I wouldn't say that. It really has its own sound.
__________________
"It's only castles burning." - Neil Young
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-15-2020, 10:18 AM
Andromeda Andromeda is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canandaigua NY
Posts: 14,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pura Vida View Post
No, I wouldn't say that. It really has its own sound.
Thanks! I do like the Eastman sound!
__________________
Liam F. 👽🖖🏼👑 🎶
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=