#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
______________ ---Tom H --- |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by jazzer44; 10-29-2019 at 11:03 AM. Reason: typo |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
https://www.acousticguitarforum.com/...7&goto=newpost where Les Paul related guitar to a steel rail train track and found that a string will "ring forever" when suspended on such a solid beam, then he went on to pioneer electric guitar with his "log guitar" design. I installed a center beam in an old double bass to find same improvements in ring tone that Taylor claimed with its V-brace over X-brace, then related it to Les Paul's experiment and back to acoustic guitar. So the similar problem you're asking about is the not-so-true ring tone coming from the X brace that Taylor has now ditched for something better. On the cover of their summer 2019 magazine, Taylor used the term "Ringing Truer than Ever". Taylor's claims of improvement are well documented so I won't re-iterate what they say. On the flip side my center beam experiments show that aligning more continuous mass with the strings shows same results, and I think this information is valuable to anyone wishing come up with their own bracing instead of copying something that someone else designed. I describe the old X brace sound as "Swirl Sound" because that's what it sounds like to me. And, as pleasant as that sound can be at times, is not practical for the working guitarist who needs to blend with other musicians and adapt to different situations on a regular basis. Discovering true-tone ring offers an explanation why X bracing is rarely used in more demanding styles like classical or jazz. By altering the position of the bass bar in a violin to cross the center axis and be less in-line with the strings, my experiment demonstrated not-so-true ring can be found in violin as well as guitar. |