The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Classical

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-16-2020, 07:51 AM
PeterMN PeterMN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 89
Default Rosewood overtones on classical guitar

I recently rediscovered the joys of playing fingerstyle on my new steel string Eastman E8 OM. It is my first guitar with rosewood back and sides and I find that it's overtones really let the guitar sing. It's reverb-esque quality sounds particularly beautiful when playing classical pieces. It has me wondering, if I were to ever take up classical guitar could I expect a nylon guitar with rosewood back and sides to have similar tonal qualities, or is the lower string tension and/or other factors such that the reverb quality would be lost?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-16-2020, 10:23 AM
Bax Burgess Bax Burgess is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SE PA
Posts: 2,482
Default

You've touched on it, nylon and steel are far apart. For instance, when I add vibrato on a steel, I achieve it by rapid lateral bending, which has negligible effect on my nylon. On a nylon I use the rapid parallel movement. So the sensitivities of steel and nylon are significant. A nylon guitar with a rosewood back would need to be compared with a comparable nylon, mahogany backed guitar. If I wanted Flamenco snap, that's easier, Maple always seems to deliver in that regard. With a Classical, I would be satisfied with either Mahogany or Rosewood, the top being the decider.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-16-2020, 10:54 AM
charles Tauber charles Tauber is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 8,381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterMN View Post
... could I expect a nylon guitar with rosewood back and sides to have similar tonal qualities...
No. One is apples, the other oranges. A nylon string instrument is a different
animal than a steel string guitar: they don't sound at all alike, regardless of the materials used to make them.

That also makes the assumption that "this" wood sound like "this" and "that wood sounds like "that". That is a fairly widely held belief, with not a lot of basis. People don't like to hear that.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-01-2020, 04:49 PM
OKCtodd71 OKCtodd71 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 449
Default

FWIW, on classical guitars rosewood B&S are far, far more common than hog. This does not mean that hog can't work or that you won't prefer mahogany B&S over rosewood. But the vast majority of professional recordings that you've heard feature rosewood rather than mahogany.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-01-2020, 06:32 PM
MarkinLA MarkinLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 112
Default

A great reason for playing classical pieces on classical guitars is the wide nut.
Classical music has much of the time, several lines intertwining simultaneously..Steel string guitars' narrower nuts don't spread the strings far enough apart so as to prevent unwanted deadening of notes meant to be kept ringing..Plus, the nylon or titanium strings closer match the original sound of cat gut strings in the 15th or later centuries..Steel strings are more like a mandolin's sound...the precursor to the modern steel string, plectrum guitar.....
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Classical






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=