#1
|
|||
|
|||
What should I do with this J45?
How have you handled guitars that are right on the edge of needing a neck reset? Play 'em or take 'em apart?
I bought this J45 off craigslist in 2009. I was 23 at the time and it was my first nice acoustic. It played well enough and I was thrilled to have it. I brought it into The Music Emporium for a setup and they told me that the geometry of the guitar necessitated a neck reset. I took it to Peter Stokes and he disagreed with that assessment. He shaved a tiny bit off the treble side of the bridge, put in a bone saddle and it has stayed that way ever since. It continues to play well even today. It is now my guitar that gets played the least. I'm thinking about selling it, but not sure if I should take it in for another setup or maybe even a reset and then re-evaluate if I want to keep it or not. Or maybe I should sell it but just at a discount bc it may or may not need a neck reset? I have used a pack of sandpaper to perform the straight edge test and you can see the corner just hits the front corner of the bridge and it has been that way for years. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If it plays well, and I intended to sell it, I would not put money into it, as you aren't likely to get that money back in an increased selling price. If it actually does play well, I would not discount it because it might, someday, need a neck reset. If it has been stable for an extended period of time, it isn't likely to need a neck reset in the near future. The straight-edge test is an indicator of the need for a neck reset, but not definitive. For a definitive answer, you need some specific measurements. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
A pack of sandpaper is not really long enough to get a good idea of neck geometry in regards to neck-set angle.
Since many guitars often have a small amount of fingerboard fall-away at the higher frets, a short straight edge (12 inches or less) will biase your measurements. See if you can get your hands on a 24 inch ruler, preferably one made out of aluminum or stainless steel. Then perform the neck geometry/neck-set measurement again. The longer straight edge will give you a better idea if the guitar is in need of repair, or not, since it rides up on the neck and takes into account some factors that may biase your results, like neck relief or fall-away. Nevertheless, you're on the right track in regards to your understanding of how to measure neck-set geometry quick-and-dirty .
__________________
Leonard 1918 Gibson L-1 1928 Gibson L-4 (Blond w/Ebony Fret-board) 1930's Kalamazoo KG-32 1930's Gretsch F-50 1934 Gibson L-7 1934 Gibson L-50 (KG-11/14 Body Shape) 1935 Gibson L-50 (Flat-back) 1935 Gibson L-30 (Flat-back) 1942 Gibson L-50 (WWII Banner Head) 1948 Gibson L-50 1949 Epiphone Blackstone "a sharp mind cuts cleaner than a sharp tool" |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Relieve the truss rod so the neck is dead flat. Use a longer straight edge such as a metal yardstick - aa short straight edge is inaccurate
__________________
Fazool "The wand chooses the wizard, Mr. Potter" Taylor GC7, GA3-12, SB2-C, SB2-Cp...... Ibanez AVC-11MHx , AC-240 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the replies so far! Being in a major city you'd think it would be easy to just pop into a luthier's shop to discuss this but that is not the case these days.
Quote:
Overall, the initial shock of TME telling me it needed a reset still stays with me. I wrote the person I had just bought it from a frantic email asking for my money back. He encouraged me to get a second opinion. I accepted the results, cooled my jets after that, and played it for many years. If I sell it I wouldn't want to deceive a new buyer but I don't want to tell them that it needs a neck reset if it doesn't. I have seen guitars in obvious need of a neck reset and this is not one of those cases. Seems like it's right on the edge which is why I'm asking for everyone's advice now. Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
If it has that sound over larger sections of the fingerboard, it suggests, issues with neck/fingerboard shape and/or string heights relative to the tops of the frets (i.e. saddle height). It could also be something else on the instrument that is vibrating, such as a loose brace, strings not fully seated in the bridge, shape of the saddle, loose machine head washers, etc. Quote:
1. the string height from top of the 12th fret to bottom of the strings 2. the amount of saddle projecting from the top of the bridge 3. the vertical string height from the guitar top to the bottom of the strings at the bridge. 4. the amount of curvature (relief) in the neck You can measure 1-3, above, with a short ruler in 1/32", 1/64" or mm, your choice. The neck relief should, typically be between .005" and .01", as measured mid-span (7th fret) when the bass E string is simultaneously pressed against the first and 14th fret. If the neck relief is in within that range, then double the difference between the string heights you have at the 12th fret and the string heights you want at the 12th fret, is the amount that would need to be removed from the saddle to obtain your desired string height at the 12th fret. To ensure adequate break angle of strings over the saddle, you need to maintain about 1/16" minimum. If you can remove from the existing saddle height the amount you have measured and calculated above, the saddle can be reduced to obtain your desired string height at the 12th fret. If not, it is a candidate for some form of remedial action. Remedial action can be ramping the bridge holes to increase break angle over the saddle, shaving the bridge, as you've already had done, or changing the neck angle (neck reset). It depends upon the specifics of the instrument - and its geometry - how viable ramping the holes and shaving the bridge are. In many cases, if extensive shaving of the bridge is done, if a neck reset is done later, the bridge might need to be replaced. If the current string height at the 12th fret is what you want, and you have sufficient break angle over the saddle, you likely don't need a neck reset. The photos you posted show an adequate break angle of strings over the saddle. There is likely room to do some ramping, if necessary. In some instruments, there is a loss of volume as the vertical string height from guitar top to bottom of the strings decreases. Some report regaining that volume after having a neck reset that increases that vertical height. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
You are correct, and I was thinking the same thing as well. Perhaps I will just suck it up and take it to a tech. There seems to be more possibilities than I thought with this guitar.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Have you looked at the nut end ???from the pictures, it appears the slots are pretty deep, maybe worn down.???
I find alot of buzzing issues are due to a worn out or improper nut cut. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
It looks to me like you can get away with lowering the saddle a bit too. I bet you could get another 1/16th inch there.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I'm not qualified to say whether or not you need a neck reset, but if you do, I think it would be worth the expense for a guitar the caliber of a J45. Something to consider, Gibson offers a Repair and Restoration Service:
https://www.gibson.com/Support/Repair-And-Restoration Perhaps they could be of some help.
__________________
Acoustics: Martin D35 Martin OM-16GT Gibson J-45 Standard Breedlove Pursuit Concerto CE Takamine F400S 12-string Yamaha FG800 Citation CIT8000 "The Survivor" Electrics: Fender Standard Stratocaster (2004) |