#16
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with Tim, and would avoid set #2. Without seeing the sides, and without seeing the outline of the guitar to be built traced on it, I’d probably go with set #3 (assuming it's wide enough so I could avoid using the sapwood).
__________________
Chuck 2012 Carruth 12-fret 000 in Pernambuco and Adi 2010 Poling Sierra in Cuban Mahogany and Lutz 2015 Posch 13-fret 00 in Indian Rosewood and Adi Last edited by ChuckS; 10-24-2023 at 01:46 PM. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
With set 1 & 2 to choose from I’d save the money and buy some other rosewood and be happy with it
__________________
Current: 2008 Taylor GC8 2009 Esteve 8 EIR/Romanian Spruce 2001 Fender Stratocaster vintage '62 and a hefty amount of cheap beaters to circle around the house Sold: 2014 Lowden F25 Custom 2006 Taylor GS6e My John Renbourn tribute |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I vote #1, a very nice looking back that will really look great under finish.
Hopefully, the sides are a good match to the back. Do you have any pictures of the sides for these sets? duff Be A Player...Not A Polisher |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
No3 everyday for me... stunning. And I would ditch the sap wood and and if needed be happy to use the off cuts from the upper bout area to 'wing' the lower bout if extra width is needed. These woods (if they come with CITIES certification, and sadly so much does not.. especially in US) are precious and we should not be sacred of multiple pieces used etc... and its stunning
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
numero uno
__________________
Don 1929 SS Stewart Pro Archtop 1921 G Houghton Archtop Banjo 2007 George Rizsanyi Custom Maple Banjo Killer 2017 James Malejczuk Custom OM Black Limba 1980 Norman B50-12 Norman B-20 Recording King single 0 1996 Takamine 1967 Yam G-130 Melvina 1980s Seagull S6 Cedar 2003 Briarwood 1970s Eko Maple 1982 Ovation 2020 Fender Telecaster Mandolin Yam THR5A Sienna 35 Kustom |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I would agree with the assessment that #2 is clearly closer to flat sawn than quartered. Number 1 or 3 would be my choice.
__________________
Ryan Gerber |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with Tim that #2 is flat sawn.
Mark
__________________
Mark Hatcher www.hatcherguitars.com “"A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking". Steven Wright |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
No 3 if you can get fairly-matching sides.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Really appreciate all of your comment!!!
I am asking the luthier for more information on the wood properties and sides photo. All three have CITES permit, and the sides will be laminated. At this moment, #1 get my vote too. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
I'd choose set #1, unless the sides are cr*p.
__________________
Kevin Krell, Executive Director, International Traditional Music Society, Inc. A non-profit 501c3 charity/educational public benefit corporation Wooden Flute Obsession CDs https://www.acousticguitarforum.com/...d.php?t=572579 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
#1, then #3. Would pass rather than select #2
__________________
Multiple guitars including a 1979 Fender that needs a neck re-set |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
#1 is my favorite visually.
__________________
For sale: Mint Condition Guild D125-12 All Mahogany 12 string 2009 Martin 000-18 Golden Era 1937 |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Clearly they differ visually, and they may also differ sonically. So I'd talk to the builder about the sound I want and ask him if the sonic characteristics of the three sets differ and if so which one would suit what we are trying to achieve in overall tone for the guitar.
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
I'd avoid #2 as it's at least partly flat-sawn.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Well, just on sight alone, after watching a video with Dana Bourgeouis choosing woods for tone. I'd choose #2. As he states, that straighter grain resonates better.
Other than that, on a custom build, I'd like to tap the wood and hear the tone differences. Don't know if I'd know the difference or not. Buy hey. I saw Dana do it. |