#1
|
||||
|
||||
Mod V (CEO-7) vs. MLO (Martin "Standard" Series)
My smallish hands fit well with the newish Martin MLO neck profile, but I'm curious as to how different the feel is compared to a Modified-V profile like on the CEO-7. Unfortunately, I can't find a CEO-7 in stock at any store around me to try myself, or this wouldn't be a question.
I've heard some folks say they just couldn't get along with the V...but I have a D-18v with what they call a "Modified V" profile, and have no issue at all with it at least on that guitar. I have more issues switch from a 1.75" nut width on my OM to the 1 & 11/16" one on the D18v than I do with the neck shape. Could some who have a CEO-7 and a Martin guitar with the MLO profile chime in and let me know? Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I've had both recently. The MLO has a little more shoulder and C shape compared to the mod V which has a little less shoulder and a moderate V shape. The differences to me were obvious but subtle in my hand. I hope that helps. YMMV
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Had to sell my CEO-7 because the Mod-V was to much to handle for my small fret hand(and lack of a mid-finger). Sure miss its tone! My other Martins are the MLO(0-15) and Tapered MLO (00-28). They conform to my fret hand with less strain than the Mod-V. The short scale is also a plus for my fingers.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe you could find someone who has a 000-28 Eric Clapton in stock which also has a Mod V and a 1-3/4" nut. I have one and a 2017 000-42(mod v 1-3/4")...I love this neck and I have average size hands. I had a 2018 D-42 with the new neck and I hated it. I really want a D-42 again but not till I can custom shop one with the Mod-V neck. I know a lot of people don't like the Mod V neck, but for me it is very comfortable.
Also, my wife is tiny...4'11" with tiny hands and she's loves The Mod V neck...but she also loves the MLO Last edited by Trinity13; 05-25-2019 at 10:13 AM. Reason: adding info |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I've had both profiles and much prefer the mod V. It felt better in my almost average size hand and with less shoulder it was easier to throw over the thumb to fret. I've got a Martin OMC-18 Juber w/mod V and I love it.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I have both in the current herd. Prefer the mlo but, can get along with the mod v.
__________________
Custom Huss and Dalton 00-SP Custom Huss and Dalton CM CS Martin 000 12 fret Martin CEO-7 Custom Huss and Dalton DS 12 fret Cole-Clark FL3AC American standard strat |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Another guitar that the OP can try that feels very similar to the CEO-7 (to my hands) is the 00-DB Jeff Tweedy. When I was shopping for my CEO-7 in 2015 the local stores had lots of 00-DB and no CEO-7. It turned out that the 00-DB was a good stunt double for the CEO-7.
__________________
2022 Eastman E40 00 Cordoba C5 2018 Martin 00-17 Authentic 1931 2018 Guild M-20 2015 Martin CEO-7 2012 Martin OM-21 2011 Voyage-Air VAOM-04 2011 Taylor GA8 1930's Supertone Parlor |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The Clapton 000-28 I owned had a fuller/beefier profile than the standard Modified V I've had on my two CEO-7's. The Clapton is actually my favorite Martin neck profile. It's not an apple to apple comparison.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
That's interesting....I didn't realize that, although I do feel a little difference between my 000-42 and my EC.....The main difference I feel when I pick up the EC is that the neck just feels fast and smooth....weird. I thought it was just my imagination. Nice to know there is something behind it.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I was talking to the sales guy at my favorite guitar shop just the other day about the plethora of Martins available these days.
He threw out the statement that the MLO neck is Martin's attempt at copying the Taylor neck. I hadn't thought about it that way, but maybe he's right. And, for what it's worth, I really like the Mod V neck. The MLO neck, and the Taylor necks, are too slender for me.
__________________
2002 Martin OM-18V 2012 Collings CJ Mh SS SB 2013 Taylor 516 Custom |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
The 3 Martins in my stable all have a V profile neck. My hands are probably smaller than average. To me the V profile is more comfortable. The Martin V's are softer now then they were years ago. Not as sharp. I went from loving the Low profile necks to the soft V's, although that may have come from maturing as a player too..Go out and try some if you can, you may love the MLO, or maybe the V neck will be just right for you..Edit to add; After re-reading your post to the end, I'm thinking maybe it might be the string spacing that is giving you the trouble. The CEO-7 has a wider string spacing at the bridge than your D-18v (which is a great guitar). You just might need to get use to adjusting to that string spacing more than anything..I know I did. That's why I have a D-18A, it has the wider string spacing..
__________________
2007 Martin Custom 000c-28GE 2016 Martin Custom CEO7R 2020 Martin SC-13E Breedlove D20 SM Recording King RP2-626 Ibanez AV4CE Gretsch Tenor Uke Martin C1K Uke Last edited by jimcaleca; 05-26-2019 at 09:43 AM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I’ve played a 02 d18v and found the ceo7 neck more comfortable than the d18v. I also thought it was different than the Clapton and I preferred the ceo7 to it, not just for the neck but the tone. I bought a used ceo7 and love it. But I found it harder to get used to the string spacing and easier to get used to v neck. I do struggle with getting my stubby thumb over the top for chords like an f or d, compared to a mlo neck like my hd28.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I am a 5’ tall lady with small hands. I have a 2015 CEO7 and used to have D18V (sold b/c of dread size not V neck). I find the V neck quite comfortable.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I'm a huge fan of the MLO necks - the most comfortable I've ever played. Simply put, "V" necks cause me pain and swelling. Which is why I've got a 00L-17, instead of the CEO-7. From what I've read, most people prefer the CEO-7, but I'm very happy with my choice. It's a lot of guitar for the money.
... JT
__________________
"Yield to temptation. It may not pass your way again." - Robert A. Heinlein |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The modern neck profile Martin is using on most of their models these days is, for me, the most comfortable neck that Martin has ever made. So I'm a fan, and that's what I have on the three Martins I currently own. Since as human beings we come in all sorts of shapes and sizes, it shouldn't be surprising that our hands and the geometric ratios of how our finger lengths compare to the size of our palms should come in a number of variations, as well. I wouldn't expect all of you to be able to fit into my shoes or trousers (and would be really annoyed if I were to come downstairs and find you trying them on...) so none of us should expect all of us to all like the same guitar neck profiles, either. I remember way back in the RMMGA UseNet days there was a German guy on there who got really didactic with me when I expressed a preference for a slimmer neck profile than he liked. I was completely WRONG about that, he told me, chunkier neck profiles were obviously BETTER, and why was I spreading misinformation about fast necks being good when he'd just PROVEN that they weren't? Even allowing for the fact that English wasn't his first language, he was being a pedantic dork about the whole thing. I had to tell him: "Look, Gunther, you don't have the same hands I have. How can you tell me what's more comfortable and musically effective for me?" Short version: all of us should try a bunch of different neck profiles, see what works best for us, then not let any Internet bloviators tell us what we "should" prefer. Discover that for yourself, whatever your hand size and finger length might be. Because your hands aren't going to be exactly the same as the next person's hands. We should all just be grateful that there are a number of different neck profiles to choose from. Hope that makes sense. Wade Hampton Miller |