The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > RECORD

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-16-2014, 04:26 PM
rick-slo's Avatar
rick-slo rick-slo is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 12,536
Default Sacraficing your sound for mono?

How much are you willing to compromise your stereo sound for mono compatibility, and why?
__________________
Derek Coombs
Website -> Music -> Tabs -> CDs and Youtube
Guitars by Mark Blanchard, Albert&Mueller, Paul Woolson, Collings, Composite Acoustics, and Derek Coombs
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-16-2014, 05:14 PM
muscmp muscmp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: socal
Posts: 8,128
Default

i usually only record keys and drum tracks(not live) in stereo, otherwise, everything else is recorded in mono.

play music!
__________________

2014 Martin 00015M
2009 Martin 0015M
2008 Martin HD28
2007 Martin 000-18GE
2006 Taylor 712
2006 Fender Parlor GDP100
1978 Fender F65
1968 Gibson B25-12N
Various Electrics
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-16-2014, 05:38 PM
sdelsolray sdelsolray is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 6,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick-slo View Post
How much are you willing to compromise your stereo sound for mono compatibility, and why?
I'm willing to totally compromise it. If you collapse one of my recordings to mono I want it to completely null out - no sound at all. None. That'll teach 'em.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-16-2014, 09:28 PM
Aldwyn Aldwyn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Columbia, Md
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muscmp View Post
i usually only record keys and drum tracks(not live) in stereo, otherwise, everything else is recorded in mono.

play music!
Ditto. The only addition here is acoustic guitars. I almost ALWAYS use two mics. And usually, they are recording in stereo.
__________________
PRS Angelus Custom
Martin Custom 00-15M
Martin DC-16RGTE
Cordoba C10 Crossover
Many more!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-17-2014, 06:14 AM
MikeBmusic MikeBmusic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: On the Mass/NH border
Posts: 5,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muscmp View Post
i usually only record keys and drum tracks(not live) in stereo, otherwise, everything else is recorded in mono.

play music!
That's not what the OP meant. Today's 'kids' are listening to music on their smartphones with one ear bud or the crappy little speaker - in mono.
I've been checking my mixes in mono, very easy to do in Reaper, as there is a 'mono' button the master buss.
This is a good way to ensure there is no phase cancellation issue (haha to sdelsolray).
__________________
Mike

My music: https://mikebirchmusic.bandcamp.com

2017 Taylor 114ce-N
2012 Taylor 310ce
2011 Fender CD140SCE
Ibanez 12 string a/e
73 Epiphone 6830E 6 string (made in 71?)

72 Fender Telecaster
Epiphone Dot Studio
Epiphone LP Jr
Chinese Strat clone ($25!)

Kala baritone ukulele
Seagull 'Merlin'
Washburn Mandolin
Luna 'tatoo' a/e ukulele
antique banjolin
Squire J bass
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-17-2014, 06:18 PM
muscmp muscmp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: socal
Posts: 8,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeBmusic View Post
That's not what the OP meant. Today's 'kids' are listening to music on their smartphones with one ear bud or the crappy little speaker - in mono.
I've been checking my mixes in mono, very easy to do in Reaper, as there is a 'mono' button the master buss.
This is a good way to ensure there is no phase cancellation issue (haha to sdelsolray).
oh, i guess i'm out of the loop. never mind! ha!

play music!
__________________

2014 Martin 00015M
2009 Martin 0015M
2008 Martin HD28
2007 Martin 000-18GE
2006 Taylor 712
2006 Fender Parlor GDP100
1978 Fender F65
1968 Gibson B25-12N
Various Electrics
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-17-2014, 06:58 PM
Bob Womack's Avatar
Bob Womack Bob Womack is offline
Guitar Gourmet
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Between Clever and Stupid
Posts: 21,541
Default

Call me old fashioned but I don't sacrifice. It is a given to me that I always work with techniques that foster compatibly and check compatibility. I learned that in 1972 when I put on Paul Simon's "Mother and Child Reunion," and accidentally pushed in the headphone jack halfway, shorting the two channels to mono. The lead guitar, lead guitar only, went completely away but its reverb remained. When I shoved in the jack completely the lead guitar sound was really wide with no center image. When I studied recording in college in 1979 I found the reason: The guitar was run into two channels and the phase was reversed on one, causing the wide image. The reverb was true stereo, the output from a stereo plate reverb, and was non-coherent, meaning that it shared little information between the channels, so it didn't phase cancel.

I've always just considered it necessary to be phase coherent so it isn't a compromise.

Bob
__________________
"It is said, 'Go not to the elves for counsel for they will say both no and yes.' "
Frodo Baggins to Gildor Inglorion, The Fellowship of the Ring

THE MUSICIAN'S ROOM
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-17-2014, 07:24 PM
rick-slo's Avatar
rick-slo rick-slo is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 12,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Womack View Post
Call me old fashioned but I don't sacrifice. It is a given to me that I always work with techniques that foster compatibly and check compatibility. I learned that in 1972 when I put on Paul Simon's "Mother and Child Reunion," and accidentally pushed in the headphone jack halfway, shorting the two channels to mono. The lead guitar, lead guitar only, went completely away but its reverb remained. When I shoved in the jack completely the lead guitar sound was really wide with no center image. When I studied recording in college in 1979 I found the reason: The guitar was run into two channels and the phase was reversed on one, causing the wide image. The reverb was true stereo, the output from a stereo plate reverb, and was non-coherent, meaning that it shared little information between the channels, so it didn't phase cancel.

I've always just considered it necessary to be phase coherent so it isn't a compromise.

Bob
100% phase coherent is pure mono.
__________________
Derek Coombs
Website -> Music -> Tabs -> CDs and Youtube
Guitars by Mark Blanchard, Albert&Mueller, Paul Woolson, Collings, Composite Acoustics, and Derek Coombs
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-17-2014, 07:47 PM
runamuck runamuck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick-slo View Post
How much are you willing to compromise your stereo sound for mono compatibility, and why?
I'm willing to sacrifice quite a bit but I still like there to be something there in mono, just in case.

Just in case of what?, I'm asking myself. A cell phone?!!!

If somebody's listening on a phone, at that level of fidelity, why should I care?
I really can't think of why I should.

Other than that what's mono anymore?

Jim McCarthy
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-17-2014, 11:54 PM
louparte louparte is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdelsolray View Post
I'm willing to totally compromise it. If you collapse one of my recordings to mono I want it to completely null out - no sound at all. None. That'll teach 'em.
If it sounds great in MONO - you have a great mix. Period.
__________________
Ceci n'est pas une pipe bebe.

Youtube

France (Film Musique & Fantomas)
---
Guitars: (2007) big Vietnamese archtop; (1997) Guild F65ce,
(1988) Guild D60, (1972) Guild D25, two other Vietnamese flat-tops and one classical.

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-18-2014, 04:38 AM
Ty Ford Ty Ford is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,333
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by runamuck View Post
I'm willing to sacrifice quite a bit but I still like there to be something there in mono, just in case.

Just in case of what?, I'm asking myself. A cell phone?!!!

If somebody's listening on a phone, at that level of fidelity, why should I care?
I really can't think of why I should.

Other than that what's mono anymore?

Jim McCarthy
cell phones, "blended" FM reception when the signal strength is not enough to hold a stereo signal, clock radios, overhead systems in restaurants, elevators and other commercial venues, (most) AM radio, many internet radio stations,

mono.

Regards,

Ty Ford
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-18-2014, 06:15 AM
Bob Womack's Avatar
Bob Womack Bob Womack is offline
Guitar Gourmet
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Between Clever and Stupid
Posts: 21,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick-slo View Post
100% phase coherent is pure mono.
Pardon, I meant compatible.

Bob
__________________
"It is said, 'Go not to the elves for counsel for they will say both no and yes.' "
Frodo Baggins to Gildor Inglorion, The Fellowship of the Ring

THE MUSICIAN'S ROOM
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-18-2014, 06:30 AM
KevWind KevWind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Edge of Wilderness Wyoming
Posts: 11,113
Default

I'm not sure I really get the question? Especially since any good mix on my home stereo or studio system sounds fine (albeit less dynamic) on my I phone even with just the built in speaker. Guess I'll have to listen closer.

And maybe I have not been paying attention but everybody I see listening on ear buds has a pair?

And when a playback system is actually putting out mono isn't it just putting putting both the L and R into one combo output?

The only thing I have noticed about trying to get a mix to sound good on limited playback systems is if the mix has lows like a kick drum or bass gtr. you seem to loose everything below about 150 hz so I tend to boost 100 to 250 a bit to keep the low instruments still audible
__________________
" Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding." Albert Einstein
Enjoy the Journey.... Kev...


KevWind at Soundcloud

Last edited by KevWind; 05-18-2014 at 06:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-18-2014, 03:19 PM
janmulder janmulder is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 650
Default

I think the more you move away from in front of your stereo speakers you are moving away from that perfect stereo sound (might be wrong on this ... I'm writing as I'm thinking about it ) ... for example, taken to extremes, when you have the music on in the living room but you are in the hall ... you are hearing a mono signal ... through the doorway.
__________________
Jan
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-19-2014, 03:28 AM
Ty Ford Ty Ford is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,333
Default

Bob's explanation was pretty clear. There are some recording techniques and effect that achieve their stereo wideness by taking one track copying it and flipping the polarity. When these two are played back and panned to extremes you get a very wide sound. When you combine them in mono, the sound can disappear because the two polarities cancel out..
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > RECORD

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=