The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Build and Repair

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #46  
Old 08-25-2023, 02:08 PM
Victory Pete Victory Pete is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DickHutchings View Post
Thank you. I won't be using Titebond to glue my bridges.
I have used Titebond and Fish Glue. I have never noticed any guitar, mine or customers, that had a creeping bridge. I suppose humidity and high temperatures may induce it.
__________________
http://victoryguitarshop.com/
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 08-25-2023, 02:19 PM
phavriluk phavriluk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Granby, CT
Posts: 2,966
Default

Dick, tens of thousands of guitars have had their bridges attached with Titebond without failure. Jumping to a different adhesive whose track record is infinitesimally smaller based upon someone's forum comments seems...unusual.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 08-25-2023, 02:40 PM
Carey Carey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Los Osos, CA
Posts: 849
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redir View Post
Yes I have. It tends to plow the finish up in front of it.
That's my experience, as well. I prefer Titebond Extend, if using a PVA glue. It dries slower and significantly harder, and in general acts a little more like the Animal Protein glues.

If you look at the Franklin Titebond literature it is recommended "for non-structural use", and a guitar bridge is definitely a structural use; quite a demanding one.
__________________
bonzer5

Last edited by Carey; 08-25-2023 at 02:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 08-25-2023, 02:54 PM
Victory Pete Victory Pete is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carey View Post
That's my experience, as well. I prefer Titebond Extend, if using a PVA glue. It dries slower and significantly harder, and in general acts a little more like the Animal Protein glues.

If you look at the Franklin Titebond literature it is recommended "for non-structural use", and a guitar bridge is definitely a structural use; quite a demanding one.
Unless it is a classical bridge, there really isn't that much tension on a bridge. The bridge plate takes most of the force. The bridge gets pushed down in front and rolls forward. It does want to lift from the back though.
__________________
http://victoryguitarshop.com/
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 08-25-2023, 05:10 PM
redir redir is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Posts: 7,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DickHutchings View Post
Thank you. I won't be using Titebond to glue my bridges.
Millions of guitars have been made using Titebond for all joints and they have no problems at all. I saw one... One! That had cold creep in 30 years of doing this.

It's perfectly fine.

There are arguably more joints made with HHG that fail than Titebond because HHG is more difficult to use and, especially in the hobby community of builders, lends itself to poor joints.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 08-25-2023, 05:49 PM
peter.coombe peter.coombe is offline
AGF Sponsor
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Bega, Australia
Posts: 139
Default

Mmm, I will just repeat what I said in 2019 -

We argue about glue far too much.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 08-25-2023, 06:51 PM
redir redir is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Posts: 7,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter.coombe View Post
Mmm, I will just repeat what I said in 2019 -

We argue about glue far too much.
Now lets talk about 'tone wood' combinations
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 08-30-2023, 01:32 AM
nikpearson nikpearson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire, U.K.
Posts: 976
Default Also a Titebond Extend user

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carey View Post
That's my experience, as well. I prefer Titebond Extend, if using a PVA glue. It dries slower and significantly harder, and in general acts a little more like the Animal Protein glues.

If you look at the Franklin Titebond literature it is recommended "for non-structural use", and a guitar bridge is definitely a structural use; quite a demanding one.
You get a good 10-15 minutes open time, significantly longer than Titebond Original, and it does appear to dry harder as evidenced when sanding. While Titebond may not have the crystalline hardness of hot hide glue I really don’t think that creep is an issue - or sound transfer for that matter.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 08-30-2023, 03:31 AM
RogerHaggstrom RogerHaggstrom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Örnsköldsvik, Sweden
Posts: 168
Default

This summer I had a guitar, with the back glued with fish glue, back for repair. The glue seams in the bottom had come loose, probably because of an unusually humid summer.

Nowadays, I use a small amount of urea added to the hot hide glue to get longer set time. I always use clean hot hide glue on the neck- and heel blocks to secure the back, only the fish glue part of the glue line on this back was loose.
__________________
Many ways to do wrong, fewer ways to do right
www.gammelgura.se
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 08-31-2023, 06:23 PM
Carey Carey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Los Osos, CA
Posts: 849
Default

This was an interesting article about one maker's animal protein glue test
results: https://christianschabbon.com/all-about-glue/
__________________
bonzer5
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 09-01-2023, 02:33 PM
redir redir is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Posts: 7,694
Default

I'll have to check my Fish Glue experiment. About ten years ago I glued two pieces of walnut together and tied a weight to one end and hung the other part on a nail on the wall of a loft barn outside exposed to tremendous heat and humidity in the summer and near zero degree temps in the winter.

I've not looked at it in probably a year but the last I looked it was still holding. I have heard plenty of horror stories about fish glue delamination's and while us luthiers should build the best we can and even build in some 'error handling' expecting our clients might abuse the guitar by accident some day my guess is that it takes some good abuse to delaminate a good joint with fish glue.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 09-02-2023, 02:22 PM
Carey Carey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Los Osos, CA
Posts: 849
Default

I use and like Norland fish glue, but based on my own informal tests I think
it's definitely more hygroscopic than hide glue, and maybe a little softer in
the cured glue line- which takes some time.

A lower bloom hide glue like that one Mr Schabbon mentions
is on my list to try very soon; hopefully it'll have a longer open time
and be more forgiving than the 220g I've used so far.
__________________
bonzer5
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 09-05-2023, 04:38 PM
Dave in Tejas Dave in Tejas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Beaumont, Tx
Posts: 113
Default

Four pages of a thread about glue, and not one mention of Gorilla?
__________________
The best guitar plays for the player.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 09-05-2023, 04:48 PM
BlueBowman BlueBowman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 725
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave in Tejas View Post
Four pages of a thread about glue, and not one mention of Gorilla?
As a non-builder of guitars, THAT's my go to glue!

Full Disclosure: I love the glue threads.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Build and Repair






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=