#16
|
|||
|
|||
Big thing no one's mentioned is BRACING. Assuming we're talking current Martins...
OM-28, OM-28 Deluxe, and OM-21 are 1/4" scalloped braced with long scale. Only difference is aesthetics. 000-28 has 5/16" scalloped bracing and short scale. 000-28 Modern Deluxe is the Goldilocks combo here with the 1/4" scalloped ("golden era") bracing with short scale. Lots of other differences too, but bracing and scale is key here, with finer scalloping and torrified sitka top. For my money, I'd take a used OM-28 Marquis over any of the above, any day of the week. Love that guitar and a chunky neck. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
2020 Martin HD-28 2018 Martin OM-21 Amber 2005 Blueridge BR-280 Brazilian |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks to everyone else that has replied. I am really leaning towards the OM-28 now and will make it my goal to try and track down some of the different versions that are out there to try. Once again thank you all.
__________________
2020 Martin HD-28 2018 Martin OM-21 Amber 2005 Blueridge BR-280 Brazilian |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
There will be several differences in the different OM-28's, the biggest 2 IMO being neck shape and string spacing at the saddle.
1. I believe the Marquis and 28V are both 2 5/16" at the saddle (vs 2 3/16"). If you play a lot of finger style, or have bigger fingers, the extra real estate may help. For strumming, might not mean that much. 2. The current OM's have the modified low oval PA taper. Some love it, some prefer the chunkier necks of the 28V and Marquis. Again, I think they both have a modified V shape, which I never found that difficult to manage, but they do take getting used to if you are used to Taylor or the MLOPA necks on the newer Martins. Looking forward to seeing what you get.
__________________
Strummin' to a different chord |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
So after debating with myself over and over which I wanted I finally found a shop 2 hours away that has both. Drove out on Saturday and tried both guitars. The OM-28 won me over. To my ear it was crisp and clear in sound where the 000-28 was more muddy. With the OM everything sounded clear on the strum and picking. Just a beautiful sound. So I have my HD28V for sale and when it sells I will pull the trigger on an OM-28 Ambertone and then I guess Ill wait a year till it comes in. First Martin I am buying new and I cant wait.
__________________
2020 Martin HD-28 2018 Martin OM-21 Amber 2005 Blueridge BR-280 Brazilian |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by drednot; 10-25-2021 at 08:37 PM. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I also had the 000-28 OM-28 dilemma.
I was also after the 000 because I wanted the short scale. I played an OM-28 a couple years ago, and really liked it. I couldn't find a 000 to play local. So I went to YouTube, and listened to comparisons. The difference seemed to be, a bit fuller tone on the OM-28. Also the OM comes standard with electronics. Very happy with my OM-28 |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Out of that bunch the OM-28 would be my recommendation. It will give you a lot of latitude to do most anything you ask of it. Best of luck! Wish I'd kept the last one I had...
__________________
Jim Dogs Welcome......People Tolerated! |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Between those 3, the OM21 is the one that impressed me the most. The OMs from Martin certainly have a better bass response than the OOO. You can feel it the very first strum you do on the guitar. I think it is a more versatile guitar as you can easily use it for strumming, flat picking, etc.
However, I prefer the comfort of the OOO. I also think it sounds better for fingerstyle and blues. OM21 and OM28 essentially have the same sound. Esthetic is better on the OM28, but for the price difference between both, I think OM21 is a better value. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
I prefer long-scales. Why are there no OM18's?
__________________
Martin D18 Gibson J45 Martin 00015sm Gibson J200 Furch MC Yellow Gc-CR SPA Guild G212 Eastman E2OM-CD |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
I’d just decide on the specs you like. As someone mentioned there are bracing differences, nut and saddle spacing differences and tonal differences. As a strummer and flat picker, most of us think the longer scale would be preferred. As Zoopeda says, my favorite too would be a used OM-28 Marquis which has the best features all together.
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
I recently chose the OM-28 for the sound and feel. Or perhaps, my lovely wife chose it with me. A few notes:
The OM-28 Standard Reimagined has the Modified Low Oval profile and High-Performance Taper neck. The Deluxe has a slightly asymmetrical neck with the V point offset and variable through the length. To quote Maury's Music: The profile is considerably lower than other vintage necks, with a V apex that is softened to be barely noticeable. But the real secret to this new neck is found in what Martin refers to as its “skewed” shape. The deepest part of the neck is off-center and gradually changes position, to better fit into the nook of the hand where the palm and thumb come together. It adjusts to the shape of the hand as it moves up the neck, rather than expecting the hand to adjust to the shape of the neck. It simply must be experienced to be fully appreciated!I think you'll want to get your hands on the models to find what is comfortable to you. The 000-28 has shorter scale which means less tension. It also means the guitar will be more mid-focused. You may find that the slinky strings don't support those odd finger positions required in fingerstlye as well, with less tension to anchor you laterally. By contrast, the OM-28 has more bass, an upper-mid scoop, and a lovely treble sheen to it. But the bottom line is what you feel and hear. The differences between examples can sometimes be greater than the differences between models. I tried this 1935 Sunburst OM-28 and an Amber Sunburst OM-28. This one sounded and felt absolutely lovely while the Amber example just didn't speak to me at all and didn't feel as nice either. Bob
__________________
"It is said, 'Go not to the elves for counsel for they will say both no and yes.' " Frodo Baggins to Gildor Inglorion, The Fellowship of the Ring THE MUSICIAN'S ROOM (my website) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
(Disclaimer, I have two variations of 000-28's and a 000-12 fret all mahogany, I have played a number of OM's in my "travels".)
You already have a good handle on the spec differences between the three. My two cents is that I don't share the view that the OM's longer scale will reliably result in better tone than a given 000. IMHO there's enough variation in other aspects of an individual OM/000 guitar that a given 000 may sound better than a given OM, and vice versa. So my recommendation is to play as many of both as you can and find one (either one) that you like. I have targeted 000's over OM's because I do prefer the playability of the shorter scale but I don't feel like I've sacrificed tone. PS: Regardless of which body you're playing be sure to really consider the neck profile as they can vary on specific versions of these models; find a neck that feels good to you. Last edited by gmel555; 10-27-2021 at 12:36 PM. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
I'm a Gibson fan, and have a strong preference for mahogany guitars with a short scale. I normally play Gibson Jumbo type guitars (AJ-shape, round-shouldered dread, whatever).
My one and only Martin is a mahogany 000. It's a very nice guitar and I really like the size of the Martin 000s. Take a peek at the 18-series in your travels. Mine is a 000-16GT that I picked up on sale, but I like it well enough so that I wouldn't mind moving up to a 000-18V or something of that sort. Maybe one of the Authentics or something. I know a fair bit about Gibson models, but I'm only casually acquainted with the Martin lineup. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
000
Welcome to the forum. You already have an OM. I would get the 000-28 or a 000-18. My 000-18 has been the one I like to play the most with my Larrivee OM a close second. I also agree that you should get what sounds the best to you, so if the OM sounds better to you then get one.
Last edited by DBW; 10-26-2021 at 06:08 PM. |