![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So thank you again to all for your opinions. I ended up getting a Taylor 417e-R at Sweetwater because they gave me 48 months, no interest to pay it off.
During my search I played Eastmans, Blueridge, Breedlove, Taylor, Martin, Gibson, Yamaha, Guild and even an Ovation! None to me had the playability of the Taylor. That being said I thought Martin overall had the best sound throughout the models I played, but again none played for me like the Taylor. The 417 comes with .013 gauge strings. Sounded great but a bit heavy for me. I swapped them for a set of D'Addario XS Phosphor Bronze .012. The guitar plays much easier for me, I like it, but it is NOT a bright sounding guitar (or is it me?) The guitar as is will sound great on things like the Eagles, America, classic rock, fingerpicking, blues, folk etc. I bought it primarly as I want to explore bluegrass. A local music store has a beginners BG get together coming up which I think I will attend and see how it stacks up. Any general thoughts on this? Last edited by egordon99; 10-01-2023 at 06:00 PM. Reason: Not allowed. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Definitely the guitar - I've seen plenty of Taylor players who weren't particularly bright...
![]()
__________________
"Mistaking silence for weakness and contempt for fear is the final, fatal error of a fool" - Sicilian proverb (paraphrased) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Taylor’s main reason for great success is the easy playability of their guitars.
However… When it comes to tone and sustain, any decent Martin, Collings, Santa Cruz, or USA-built Guild will win the blindfold test every time. Since you like bluegrass, I strongly suggest you try out Martin guitars, find one you like, and then have it set up by a pro so it plays comfortably. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a Taylor that is wonderful to play, but I have to agree with 6L6, I also have a Martin that plays just as easily.
__________________
John |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe try a set of the D'Addario XS 80/20's next string change. I have a 5 year old 714 that darkened up so much I was considering moving it on. 80/20's brought it back life. It gets much more lap time now.
Good Luck, Scott |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Plus one on the playability being more a set-up issue than Taylor versus Martin (I’ve owned several examples of both brands)
And agreed that 80/20s will brighten your sound. But you may need to try a few different brands to find your favourite. I don’t normally use Ernie Ball strings, but I tried Martin, Newtone and Ernie Ball on one guitar and the EBs sounded way better than the others. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have very different ways of defining "bright" or "warm" A thinner pick can make it brighter, but I would say that I hear XS strings to be on the brighter side, so your guitar must be very warm/dark sounding.
__________________
Jan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's true that a Martin can have lower action, but this may require a setup or doing it yourself if you don't have good local guys.
If bluegrass is your goal, Taylor doesn't make anything I'd consider a go to guitar for that. I once had a really nice BTO DN with an adi top that was great. Only sold it because it had a hard V neck. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
As far as playing bluegrass, hey, play whatever works for you. You see a lot of different guitars nowadays beyond the standard Martins and Gibsons in bluegrass. I know that the legendary Dan Crary has played Taylors for decades, and I have seen Trey Hensley picking on a Taylor as well. Lately I have seen quite a few people playing guitar in bluegrass bands using OMs from various makers. As long as it sounds and feels good to you, that's all that matters.
__________________
Music: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyM...Ek2LconK-gQDFg |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My take on it is all the GP/xx7 Taylors are a more traditional warmer sound and if you really wanted the "bright" Taylor sound that is not the right Taylor for that sound.
I think they're trying to diversify the tones they offer across the line. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks all. Your comments make a lot of sense. Even with all the guitars I tried and thinking the Taylor 417 was the right one, now I am wondering if I made the right decision after all! The good part is that if I return it I am only out the shipping. A small price to pay. I did try a new D28 and it sounded really good, but felt weirdly light. The Taylor feels properly weighty to me. Sweetwater had a 48 month payment option that ended on 9/30 so maybe I rushed a little?
Maybe I should return it, as nice a guitar as it is, and wait a bit, then I don't have to limit myself to any particular sale. Beninma, what you said made a lot of sense! (But no more than anyone elses ![]() Last edited by egordon99; 10-02-2023 at 11:43 AM. Reason: Please review rules |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Congratulations on your new Taylor 417e-R! Nice guitar! Enjoy if for a lifetime!
- Glenn
__________________
My You Tube Channel |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The 417-R is one of the less bright models in their catalog. Taylors in general have been known for their modern "string" forward sound. Martins are known for their body forward sound. That's a gross generalization, of course.
__________________
"Lift your head and smile at trouble. You'll find happiness someday." |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I am still trying to adjust the pickup on my 514ce I got like a month ago, as is it seems like I have to roll the treble at least back to 9 o'clock to approach the acoustic sound. The ES2 is very very bright compared to the acoustic voice of the guitar. Last edited by egordon99; 10-02-2023 at 11:44 AM. Reason: Edited Quote |
![]() |
|
Tags |
bluegrass, brightness, new strings, taylor |
Thread Tools | |
|