The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-20-2021, 09:56 PM
Villamarzia Villamarzia is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 930
Default Signal chain when using IR pedals

I have this question specifically regarding the correct signal path when having an Align Session and a Voiceprint, however it is an universal question also for Tonedexter, Optima Air etc.

So, compressors or effect working on dynamics, can go before an IR pedal or the IR has always to be the first in the chain? And in case you have a pedal in front of IR, you should train the IR using the pedal in front too? Doesn’t this cancel some of the effect (think multiband compression..)?
__________________
Marco
"If want to be happy, be." (L.Tolstoj)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-21-2021, 12:31 AM
Cuki79 Cuki79 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: France
Posts: 3,008
Default

I would say IR should be first.

Any nonlinear fx should be after (compression, distortion, modulations ...)

Things that can go before must be linear (buffer, EQ, ir clean abd transparent gain)
__________________
Martin 00-18V Goldplus + internal mic (2003)
Martin OM-28V + HFN + internal mic (1999)
Eastman E6OM (2019) Trance Audio Amulet
Yamaha FGX-412 (1998)

Gibson Les Paul Standard 1958 Reissue (2013)
Fender Stratocaster American Vintage 1954 (2014)
http://acousticir.free.fr/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-21-2021, 02:18 AM
Doug Young's Avatar
Doug Young Doug Young is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 9,912
Default

I'd view the IR as something that is almost part of the pickup - it's a correction circuit for the pickup to make it sound good to start with. If you're using one of the Martin models with the Aura builtin to the preamp, for example, it's part of the guitar electronics. So it goes first. Doing something like compressing before an IR pedal will mean you're not presenting the IR processing with the same kind of signal it was train on - unless you used the compressor for training as well. Of course, rules were made to be broken, who knows what effect you might produce by trying odd ordering...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-24-2021, 10:26 AM
J2xOP J2xOP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 11
Default

I have the session (align) and tonedexter on my pedalboard as well. After some trial and error I feel the session is best in the first spot, but excluded when recording the wave maps. Among things to consider are the headroom of the LR Baggs session. The output of the effectloop of the tonedexter is higher than the passive pickup. Also I feel the session tames the pickup's mids. It works really well in front of the tonedexter and I could not live without anymore now I have it on the board. The results when recording the wave maps are not so good so I leave it off then.

Last edited by J2xOP; 02-24-2021 at 03:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-24-2021, 11:17 AM
Petty1818 Petty1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,575
Default

I don't think it matters really. I use the Strymon Iridium and put it last in my chain. I could see putting an IR pedal first if the pedal was needing to interact with the pickup, but once your IR is created, I don't really think it matters.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-24-2021, 03:05 PM
J2xOP J2xOP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 11
Default

I also use the source audio eq2 which has can be used in fx loop mode , so you have one channel in front of the tonedexter and one after. I still have to try it out a bit more, but my idea is to use the first channel to even out the incoming pickup sound to be have a more lineair frequency responce.

I got this idea since I have a gyspy guitar with great results. But It also has a lineair sounding pickup. My octave mando has some resonant frequencies coming from the pickup and I found the results less pleasing. Anybody else tried to EQ before recording wavemaps/voiceprints?

Last edited by J2xOP; 02-24-2021 at 03:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-24-2021, 05:36 PM
AeroUSA AeroUSA is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: New York
Posts: 2,180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J2xOP View Post
I also use the source audio eq2 which has can be used in fx loop mode , so you have one channel in front of the tonedexter and one after. I still have to try it out a bit more, but my idea is to use the first channel to even out the incoming pickup sound to be have a more lineair frequency responce.

I got this idea since I have a gyspy guitar with great results. But It also has a lineair sounding pickup. My octave mando has some resonant frequencies coming from the pickup and I found the results less pleasing. Anybody else tried to EQ before recording wavemaps/voiceprints?
Yea I often find it necessary.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=