#46
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Worth to whom?
__________________
Nothing bothers me unless I let it. Martin D18 Gibson J45 Gibson J15 Fender Copperburst Telecaster Squier CV 50 Stratocaster Squier CV 50 Telecaster |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Who put the bridge on backwards on that Gibson?
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
I think part of it is availability. While D18s are everywhere, I'd probably logged 4 dozen visits to various GCs before I ever saw a Hummingbird.
Well they certainly don't look like Taylors |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
My perspective on this is that the Gibson Hummingbird is like the Martin D-35 in that both have devoted fans who love them for their warmth of tone and their player-encompassing “SurroundSound” presentation that puts the player in the center of a fat nimbus of sound. When you play good examples of either, it can be very satisfying for the person playing.
But that same enveloping presentation makes both the Hummingbird and the D-35 less practical for use in an ensemble setting, where a more projective presentation cuts through better. This is why you only rarely see D-35’s being used in bluegrass bands. There are exceptions, naturally, but not as many as you might guess. To those who reply “All you need to be heard anymore is an electric pickup,” that’s true, of course, but with all the rich harmonics that D-35’s and Hummingbirds can generate, those make it more difficult for the ear to pick out what the guitar is doing when a bunch of other instruments are being played at the same time. Short version: a good-sounding Hummingbird can be wonderfully warm-sounding, but it’s not especially projective or as practical for use in an ensemble than many of the other Gibson acoustic guitar designs. Hope that makes sense. Wade Hampton Miller |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Very tacky guitar overall....just one man's opinion, but you know what they say about those...
__________________
2020 Yamaha LL56 Custom 2021 Boucher SG-51-BMV 2020 RainSong CO-WS1000N2 2019 PRS Silver Sky |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Wade,
Can I use the quote? Best, PJ
__________________
A Gibson A couple Martins |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Even though the OP initiated this thread EXACTLY Five years ago the subject matter Is always one of possible contention.
Guitars will come and go but my sweet sounding Montana Gibson J-30 Banner Tobacco Burst Will always be with me. The J-30 is a Hummingbird with NO birds. Blues. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Funny how tastes change. I used to think the Hummingbird was the guitar to end all guitars. Now I don't think the sound is anything special, and am agree to bling. I do like the necks.
There is a home health care company with an ad on TV featuring an elderly woman strumming what is either a Hummingbird knockoff or a Hummingbird with the Gibson logo covered up. You can see the little Gibson crown logo but not the name "Gibson." I don't imagine Gibson would have any objection to featuring their guitars in a TV ad, but now I am thinking of another TV ad with no name guitars, the father - son in the junk/pawnshop. Maybe there's a reason they can't do that.These companies can afford a real Hummingbird if they want a pretty guitar. But my guess is it's a production company that keeps various cheap instruments in stock as visual props. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Funny how tastes change. I used to think -- [deleted ... this is a duplicate post]
Last edited by Le Chef; 02-22-2020 at 12:38 PM. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
After I described the enveloping presentation of the Hummingbird as creating a “fat nimbus of sound,” PJ asked:
Of course. I’m flattered that you’d want to. whm |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
I looked at/played one recently at GC. I couldn't get past its painfully bright orange outer burst color. My friend and I joked that it was a "safety guitar" for construction site use. The older ones (and maybe other models?) do not have the same tone. Even the one in the original post looks way better than the one I saw. Anyway, that would put me off esp at the $$$.
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I bought a new one in 1974 at the Buena Park mall, ca. for $400.00 out the door. I couldn't believe it was so expensive. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
If I could sing even a little bit, I would love to have one. I can't.
As to the bling, it is funny. In general, I don't care for bling on guitars. But if I am used to a model having bling, it stops bothering me. The Hummingbird, the Guild D-55, if these were new models I would not care for their looks. But after seeing them over such a long time, it seems they look just as they should. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Love my Hummingbird. Best thing that happened is I was playing it and the ornate pickguard just fell off. No tan lines, no glue residue.
Now it looks great AND plays great.
__________________
jjracer: if I'm not here.... I am somewhere else... guitars? yep still have some |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
I personally love the bling of the Hummingbird.I have a friend who has a 2017 Hummingbird that sound great, We play a lot of gigs together as a duo every gig we play at least once usually several times someone tells him what a beautiful guitar he has, not once has anyone ever complimented my J-45 or another friend of ours Martin D-18 when sits in.
Another thing that I find funny is that the D-18 which is a 2013 is not as loud as either the Hummingbird or my J-45. |