The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-19-2020, 01:31 PM
DesmondWafers DesmondWafers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Illinois
Posts: 79
Default NGD guild m20...saddle height?

I just received a guild m20, very nice sounding guitar and seems to be built pretty well, but the saddle is giving me a bit of a pause.





The strings are definitely below .5" from the top (though I rarely see martins that meet this criteria) and the action could go down just a touch for my liking. It's just above 2.25mm right now. Would this worry you? I bought it new so I could just send it back, but I wonder if I'm not just being too picky.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-19-2020, 01:40 PM
Nick84 Nick84 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 1,412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DesmondWafers View Post
I just received a guild m20, very nice sounding guitar and seems to be built pretty well, but the saddle is giving me a bit of a pause.





The strings are definitely below .5" from the top (though I rarely see martins that meet this criteria) and the action could go down just a touch for my liking. It's just above 2.25mm right now. Would this worry you? I bought it new so I could just send it back, but I wonder if I'm not just being too picky.
Did you check the neck was straight before you measured? I get what you mean it’s borderline. I don’t think your being picky - if you want the action down but still want a reasonable break angle you may need to get them to send you a replacement.
__________________
http://www.Facebook.com/NickSpencerMusic


Gibson Songwriter Standard EC
Lowden WL-22
Maton SRS808
Taylor AD11-SB
Taylor 811 GT
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-19-2020, 01:48 PM
Lee Callicutt Lee Callicutt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 341
Default

Looks good to me.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-19-2020, 02:06 PM
DesmondWafers DesmondWafers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Illinois
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick84 View Post
Did you check the neck was straight before you measured? I get what you mean it’s borderline. I don’t think your being picky - if you want the action down but still want a reasonable break angle you may need to get them to send you a replacement.
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking. The neck has just the tiniest bit of relief, so all good on that front too.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-19-2020, 03:22 PM
tailsawaggin tailsawaggin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 14
Default

2.25 mm is .088" and that's a fairly ordinary low E height. My Taylor came from the factory at .090" and the Guild dreadnought I bought last month came from the shop's setup guy exactly the same. You might like it a little lower, and that's not wrong, and 2.25 mm is also not wrong.

I'd love to get my hands on an M20 -- hope you enjoy yours.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-19-2020, 03:30 PM
Ncbandit Ncbandit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 400
Default

If the guitar sounds great and the neck relief is where you want it you can always just sand down the saddle a tad. It doesn't take much and is easy. Google the process until you are confident and just go for it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-19-2020, 03:33 PM
Dyson Guitars's Avatar
Dyson Guitars Dyson Guitars is offline
Custom Guitars
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Hillsborough, NC
Posts: 121
Default

How does it sound?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-19-2020, 03:51 PM
DesmondWafers DesmondWafers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Illinois
Posts: 79
Default

Sorry if I wasn't clear, I'm really just referring to the neck angle, not the action. I know I can get the action where I like it (just a touch under what it is right now) but the question is whether or not the neck angle being so low will wind up being a future issue. My OM28's strings are well above the 1/2" mark from the fretboard and it has an action lower than this guitar.

And it does sound quite good, but maybe not "pay for a neck reset in 2-3 years" good.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-19-2020, 03:56 PM
Ncbandit Ncbandit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DesmondWafers View Post
Sorry if I wasn't clear, I'm really just referring to the neck angle, not the action. I know I can get the action where I like it (just a touch under what it is right now) but the question is whether or not the neck angle being so low will wind up being a future issue. My OM28's strings are well above the 1/2" mark from the fretboard and it has an action lower than this guitar.

And it does sound quite good, but maybe not "pay for a neck reset in 2-3 years" good.
Oh I see!! that is a different animal for sure. I agree that worrying about a future neck reset is not ideal. If you have concerns I would send it back.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-19-2020, 04:02 PM
tailsawaggin tailsawaggin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 14
Default

Ah, gotcha. Maybe this is worth checking out?

http://www.frets.com/FretsPages/Musi...neckangle.html
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-19-2020, 05:30 PM
hairpuller hairpuller is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 3,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tailsawaggin View Post
Ah, gotcha. Maybe this is worth checking out?

http://www.frets.com/FretsPages/Musi...neckangle.html
Thanks for that! Very clarifying!!
scott
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-22-2020, 07:52 PM
curbucci curbucci is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 301
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DesmondWafers View Post
Sorry if I wasn't clear, I'm really just referring to the neck angle, not the action. I know I can get the action where I like it (just a touch under what it is right now) but the question is whether or not the neck angle being so low will wind up being a future issue. My OM28's strings are well above the 1/2" mark from the fretboard and it has an action lower than this guitar.

And it does sound quite good, but maybe not "pay for a neck reset in 2-3 years" good.
Any update on this? I was looking into buying a new M20 but I am concerned if they are coming out of the factory like this. Design flaw or is it an isolated incident? Any luthiers with any input?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-22-2020, 08:10 PM
DCCougar DCCougar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 2,964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DesmondWafers View Post
Sorry if I wasn't clear, I'm really just referring to the neck angle.... but the question is whether or not the neck angle being so low will wind up being a future issue....
Quote:
Originally Posted by tailsawaggin View Post
Right. I don't see that you've checked the neck angle, which tailsawaggin's link shows how to do. This is the neck angle test:

Quote:
"...pushing the straightedge toward the bridge I'd like to see it "land" right on top of the wooden part of the bridge."
That saddle and bridge look fine, with plenty of break angle. Can't really tell about the neck angle without doing the straightedge test.

Well, OK, the string distance to the soundboard at the bridge is also a pretty good neck angle test. You've got what looks like 7/16 inch, and ideal would be "about" 8/16 inch, as quoted in the link. You're pretty darn close!
__________________

2018 Guild F-512 Sunburst -- 2007 Guild F412 Ice Tea burst
2002 Guild JF30-12 Whiskeyburst -- 2011 Guild F-50R Sunburst
2011 Guild GAD D125-12 NT -- 
1972 Epiphone FT-160 12-string
2012 Epiphone Dot CH
 -- 2010 Epiphone Les Paul Standard trans amber 

2013 Yamaha Motif XS7

Cougar's Soundcloud page
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-22-2020, 08:51 PM
DesmondWafers DesmondWafers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Illinois
Posts: 79
Default

I don't tend to put a lot of stock into the straight edge test; I've done it to 4-5 modern martins and not one had the straight edge above the bridge, it was always just under it.

As far as the m20 goes, I think I'll keep it. I like how this one sounds and I'd rather not send it back and get one with worse issues or one that didn't sound as good.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-15-2020, 08:34 PM
Gabby84 Gabby84 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: New England
Posts: 199
Default

Carbucci, For what it’s worth, I’ve had my Oxnard M20 for close to 2 years. no issues beyond the normal maintenance. It gets played daily and has opened up nicely. My luthier checked mine out shortly after I purchased it to give it a once over during the return period. He found it to be well made and structurally sound.
__________________
2021 Iris CH sunburst with ivoriod binding
2018 Guild M 20
1996 MIJ 50th Ann. Tele Deluxe
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Thread Tools





All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=