#16
|
|||
|
|||
Yamahas
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Eastman
__________________
2011 Martin DCPA3 2001 Dean Tradition (office/beater git) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I believe ALL guitars have some kind of tone. I guess a TONELESS guitar wouldn't make any kind of sound - a silent guitar... The question is whether or not you happen to like it. I like Taylors for their tone. I like Martins for their tone. I happen to love the Gibson tone. All good to my ears - just different.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Iīm enjoying my Journey very much thank you I posted this here just as I thought some folk might find the frequency read outs interesting some of us do not use our Guitars as some sort of posturing device or status symbol and actually enjoy a dialectic approach to discovering knowledge, if you donīt then no skin of my nose. It is slightly disturbing to detect such narrow binary thinking in a number of responses a sign of the times I guess |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I just read the linked thread. Boy, am I glad no one asked about Ovations!
__________________
Well, it looks like one of those desiderata days..... MY OVATIONS Spruce: Patriot #76, 1768-7LTD, 1122, 6774, 1779 USA, 1657-Adi Redwood: 2001-X, 1537-X, 1713-X, FD14-X, Dan Savage 5743-X Koa: 2078LXF, 1768-X, 1997-X 12-string: 1755, 1615-X Walnut Exotic tops: 1768-XWF (Bubinga), 1987-M (Mahogany), Adamas 1681-X (Q. Maple) Others: MM-68-7LTD Mandolin, MM-868-X Mandocello |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I'll bet Taylor guitars sound like........well, guitars. People go on these sites and go into minute detail about the brand of strings they like so I would imagine that any difference between Taylors and Brand X, no matter how small, would create
differences of opinion amongst the guitar cognescenti. Meanwhile, after over 20 years as a professional entertainer, I have sadly observed that regardless of guitar brand chosen, most players receive accolades in direct proportion to their level of skill. It's just the way it is. Buy and play what you like. Nobody else really even cares. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Roger,
I found your video interesting and I would be very interested to read the paper that you have authored that will be published by Purdue University (which is where I obtained my engineering degree some 42 years ago). I wonder how I could obtain a copy of it? I understand that not all guitar players are going to be interested in the science behind your work, but I am. I found it fascinating and I'd like to know more... Thank you, Glenn |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Iīd explain a few things I had learned in a bit more depth. Not everybodys taste I know but I keep Bench notes with Screen Captures so of course I have footage which I occasionally put up on You Tube some people find it helpfull. Heres SOme Variax 300 Line 6 A B back to backs no scopes in this but of course yes I have analysed a lot of this stuff too. Vimeo MIDI CONVERSION PLUGIN http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qG2TTxjP1BM VARIAX. MODEL COMPARISONS General http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wdCCi8SZO4 VIS A VIS ACOUSTIC AND SOME MARTIN MODELS http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wdCCi8SZO4 ES335 and ES330 VIS A VIS VARIAX models There are others, which isnīt so surprising when its what I do during the day. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gWqSec13hA |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
This sums up the discussion of life nicely.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
the paper I mentioned is not my own one it is a study published by Mark French, Of Purdue University and may be downloaded in PDF from the following Link. I have a huge amount of material that I can point you in the direction of this really is a fascinating area of Digital Signal Processing and as Processing speeds increase Modeling and convolution plugins are really coming into their own Fishman Aura Spectrum, Line 6 Variax, Peavy and Parker with their AUTO intonating guitars. Thats even before getting into the Divided Pickup area. Also one of my favourites is the Kempner profiling amp. my plug in will do a similar thing for guitars http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywDUAw7ck8g Heres Mark Frenchīs paper www.sandv.com/downloads/0801fren.pdf |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Play your guitars and have a blast. Brand and cost mean nothing, except to an individual. Don't spend a moment of time fretting (pardon the pun) over what someone says about Taylor tone, Gibson tone, etc. etc. etc. The tone that "you" like is the only one that matters. And if you enjoy reading charts about guitar tone, then go for it. Have a blast with that too. Just remember that we own guitars to play them.
__________________
NEW SONGS on Reverbnation http://www.reverbnation.com/larrygarrett The Missouripicker's YouTube Channel URL:http://www.youtube.com/user/TheMissouripicker Gibson J100 Walnut, Gibson Hummingbird, Gibson Dove, Gibson J45TV, Gibson AJ RW, Gibson AJ Koa, Gibson Southern Jumbo, Gibson J15, Martin HD28, Alvarez MFA66SHB and many other guitars, banjos, mandolins, dobros, dulcimers, and strays. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Do you think tone and responsiveness are related? I have a Goodall where the sound "jumps" out of the guitar but I guess one would have to describe it as "modern" voiced (but I like it). I have a Martin and Leach that don't "jump" but are more normally responsive (quite responsive as they are both mahogany and spruce) but have more of the old time tone. I would enjoy seeing charts of those 3 sound waves.
__________________
bjsfolly back and sides: EIR, BRW, HRW, Walnut, "Tree," Hog. top wood: Adirondack, Sitka, Italian Spruce, Redwood, Western Red Cedar. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
That's a gross generalization and more than a little self righteous.
|