The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Custom Shop

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-12-2015, 06:53 PM
BBWW BBWW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,070
Default Double Sides for Guitars

I'm about to do some re-sawing with David Borson, mostly Quilted Mahogany.

With more builders using double sides I'm wondering if I should do a certain % at closer to a double side thickness?

Assuming that you need .005 off each side remove bandsaw marks, what thickness is your sweet spot? (Borson's rig doesn't leave much of a mark!)

Any opinions? Times are changing.

Thanks,

Jay

One of a book matched Pair of large boards.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-12-2015, 07:15 PM
Sam Guidry Sam Guidry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 107
Default

I leave my outer veneers pretty thick at .060"
__________________
Sam Guidry
www.samguidryguitars.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-12-2015, 07:16 PM
Simon Fay Simon Fay is offline
AGF Sponsor
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Smyrna Beach, FL
Posts: 1,790
Default

For those using double sides, I think you would be able to sell at/around 0.080". The exterior laminate is around 0.060" on my instruments with the interior being much thicker. However, others may do things differently.
__________________
Luthier
New Smyrna Beach, FL
www.fayguitars.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-12-2015, 07:51 PM
gregg gregg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dahlonega, Georgia
Posts: 1,141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Guidry View Post
I leave my outer veneers pretty thick at .060"
I've been leaving mine at .050-.060, really like .060 if they're not too heavy.....inner pieces are a tad thinner, but need to be really careful as anything under.040 is pretty thin.
__________________
Greg Gwaltney
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-12-2015, 11:37 PM
stringjunky stringjunky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,033
Default

What's the reasoning behind the different thickness for each laminate?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-13-2015, 06:19 AM
Tim McKnight's Avatar
Tim McKnight Tim McKnight is offline
AGF Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Morral, Ohio
Posts: 5,956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stringjunky View Post
What's the reasoning behind the different thickness for each laminate?
Weight or the lack thereof. Some builders (including myself) strive to build very light weight guitars.
__________________
tim...
www.mcknightguitars.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-13-2015, 11:11 AM
BBWW BBWW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,070
Default

I like very light guitars.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-14-2015, 10:47 AM
BBWW BBWW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,070
Default

Thanks, that helps. I'll do three billets or so for double-side builders and see how it goes.

Jay
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-14-2015, 12:01 PM
Burton LeGeyt Burton LeGeyt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 274
Default

Jay, you are an animal with that mahogany!!

I use double sides on most of my guitars (much thinner than those mentioned) but I prefer to buy regular cut sets. You never know when your or your clients' preferences may change, especially if you are purchasing a set you may not use for a while.

Also, if the set ever needs to be resold it is much easier to do that with normal thickness sides. With these extreme priced sets that is always something I think about.
__________________
Burton
Boston, MA
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-14-2015, 12:25 PM
Ned Milburn Ned Milburn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 3,127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Fay View Post
For those using double sides, I think you would be able to sell at/around 0.080". The exterior laminate is around 0.060" on my instruments with the interior being much thicker. However, others may do things differently.
So you are making your double sides near total 3.5mm... Wow!! Sounds very thick!! Why??
__________________
----

Ned Milburn
NSDCC Master Artisan
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-14-2015, 02:17 PM
Bruce Sexauer's Avatar
Bruce Sexauer Bruce Sexauer is offline
AGF Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Petaluma, CA, USA
Posts: 7,538
Default

I have buit single side guitars at .055 that passed the test of time! Different strokes! Single sided in mahogany would be around .080 for me. Saying this just for perspective, I will not be making double sided guitars in this lifetime, I predict.
__________________
Bruce
http://www.sexauerluthier.com/
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-14-2015, 03:28 PM
gregg gregg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dahlonega, Georgia
Posts: 1,141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Sexauer View Post
I have buit single side guitars at .055 that passed the test of time! Different strokes! Single sided in mahogany would be around .080 for me. Saying this just for perspective, I will not be making double sided guitars in this lifetime, I predict.
Hey Bruce, I have built with single sides too, if nothing else double sides are definitely more trouble...lol.... whether they make a positive difference is certainly debatable, for now I seem to think the extra work is worth it, but I may change my mind at some point in the future. My double sides end up around .080 when completed.
__________________
Greg Gwaltney
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-14-2015, 04:06 PM
BBWW BBWW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,070
Default

I have usually re-sawn Quilted Mahogany sides to finish sand between .100 to .105. A few have been thinner and I got no complaints. So I re-saw at a .115. (Meaning no saw marks.) This would be for single sides. I try to go as thin as I can and once or twice billets have had sides finish sand to about .90. Thinner of course is better for yield but a blade can wander a bit one this dense and figured wood so I go a bit thick sometimes when I don't have to.

Backs thicker of course to finish at out at .120. so I cut around .130.

Last edited by BBWW; 04-14-2015 at 04:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-14-2015, 08:00 PM
Bruce Sexauer's Avatar
Bruce Sexauer Bruce Sexauer is offline
AGF Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Petaluma, CA, USA
Posts: 7,538
Default

I would be surprised to learn that I have at any point in any material made a back thicker than .090! Or even as thick as.
__________________
Bruce
http://www.sexauerluthier.com/
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-15-2015, 01:25 AM
BBWW BBWW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Sexauer View Post
I would be surprised to learn that I have at any point in any material made a back thicker than .090! Or even as thick as.
I have had people tell me they like it thicker to glue up...then cut run through the thickness sander. My personal guitars have all had backs at .90 or below. I like a light guitar...

In the end with this stuff anyone who builds with it knows what they are doing. It's not for early builds. LOL

Thanks Bruce. I think we need to try a carved back flat top out of this...that might need more thickness. :-) I really liked the Maple one.

I've actually been thinking about that for a while based on my childhood love of those pressed back Guild Jumbos...that looked carved...but I'd want an OM.

Jay
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Custom Shop

Thread Tools





All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=