#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
i don't know jonas, i'll look him up. thanks, play music!
__________________
2014 Martin 00015M 2009 Martin 0015M 2008 Martin HD28 2007 Martin 000-18GE 2006 Taylor 712 2006 Fender Parlor GDP100 1978 Fender F65 1968 Gibson B25-12N Various Electrics |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I've owned two, still have one, and I'll be the first to tell you that it's strictly about the visuals; I once played a pick-up job with a bunch of hidebound folkies who told me that my Pedulla P/J was "too loud" - but my Guild B-4E was "just right" at the same volume (I checked it with an SPL meter). If you want an "acoustic" tone with some visual vibe, go with a hollow/semi-hollow electric - Hofner's Contemporary Series basses are my fave in the affordable (under $1K) bracket - and fit it with flatwound/tapewound strings; if you're working with a bluegrass/old-time group Gold Tone makes an electric resophonic bass as well as the banjo-style BB-400, and Michael Kelly used to make a hollowbody short-scale (30") on an H-5 mandola-size body...
__________________
"Mistaking silence for weakness and contempt for fear is the final, fatal error of a fool" - Sicilian proverb (paraphrased) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
For me it was just for the looks, needed to have an all acoustic look for a group I went with. But then I got an upright (if you can get over the size and develop good muscle memory its a lot of fun). I am mostly a bass player, and if I am too lazy to bring out the I just use my P bass. But I think I might get one of those bass ukuleles. They all need to be amplified btw. And use tapewounds, the PB strings are absolutely awful. La Bella Gold Tapewounds are the best I tried.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
I needed a bass guitar for a church that was transitioning from piano/organ to guitars/drums. I went with a piezo pickup in a $500 Fender acoustic bass, into a Roland KC500 keyboard amp. The acoustic bass was a bit easier to accept for folks who were uneasy with the transition, and I never had problems with feedback. They've since gone with an electric bass. I would have to begin with, but thought an acoustic would do for a while. I was right.
cotten |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I picked up a Dean acoustic bass at a flea market last year for $120. I doubt I'll ever gig with it (although it has a pickup), but I do plan on using it for some recording. I like the tone.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Most useful as a couch bass. Practice without disturbing anyone. It will not shake your house.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I wondered that though it might be an expensive practice aid
__________________
Yamaha APX-500 - Crafter MD-80 12 Eq (12-string) - and a 20 year old crappy Jose masy mas classical!
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
So, to me, this is the thing about the ABG. There isn't much reason to spend a lot of money on one. I have a Fender Kingman. It is by far the least expensive instrument I own, but I only pull it out if we are working on a tune and we need a quick, dirty approximation of the bass guitar sound. I also use it when I am working on bass lines and counterpoint for songs. As long as it doesn't buzz and it stays in tune, it is a fine tool for my needs.
__________________
Bourgeois Aged Tone Vintage D Gibson CS 1958 Les Paul Std. Reissue Mason-Dixon FE 44 Combo Amp |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe I'll keep an eye out for a cheap deal if/when I get into playing bass - I keep meaning to but never have.
It'd look nice on the wall if nothing else
__________________
Yamaha APX-500 - Crafter MD-80 12 Eq (12-string) - and a 20 year old crappy Jose masy mas classical!
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
And when plugged in, the sound quality of an acoustic/electric bass isn't up to the standard of other electric basses - they tend to be fairly hollow and thuddy sounding. A marketing gimmick, these. Last edited by jomaynor; 06-08-2016 at 12:22 AM. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry I am late to this thread, only just retrieved my forgotten password.
Felt I just had to post though as there is so much rubbish posted in this thread, with the same old, cliches we always get when posting about acoustic bass guitars- I've seen the words gimmick being used with no justification, and that old chestnut "they are not loud enough to play acoustically". All rubbish! Yes, as someone who has recently taken ownership of a very nice custom Brook bass guitar I am a little biased, but let me just give you a few thoughts on this. Firstly, why acoustic bass in the first place? Well, my music is all acoustic. And not being a double bass player (and finding the sound of the double bass to be too dark, unfocused and ubiquitous) for me an acoustic bass is the only option. As some have mentioned here already, electric basses just don't sound right with acoustic instruments. They sound is thin, with no body, too metallic and with a lack of air or bloom around the notes. I also play with a mandolin group, where if I turned up with a fender precision I would look dumb indeed. So yes, certain types of music cry out for an acoustic bass. Also, it is just that- an acoustic bass guitar, and I want it to sound like that. Like an acoustic guitar but just lower. On the question of whether they are loud enough, I find mine more than holds its own acoustically with about 5 other mandolin family instruments, including a very loud bouzouki. At other times I reinforce the sound A LITTLE with a Phil Jones cub, producing a rather wonderful, organic, deep, growly sound that is the sound of my bass only louder (thanks no doubt to the headway pickup as well). And here are some gratuitous pictures of my bass And here is my bass in action in one of my own acoustic guitar pieces: |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
You just called the opinions of many, many people "rubbish" and cliche'ed based on your anecdotal evidence and your sample size of 1. That sir, is rubbish.
You think upright basses are "ubiquitous?" "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." The hardest thing to find for a traditional bluegrass band is a double bass, to the point where owning a double bass is often the sole criteria for joining the band. That is the opposite of "ubiquitous." Finally, the points raised about volume are so well-founded as to appear to you "cliche." You may not like it, but that doesn't change the facts. You are welcome to your own opinion, but I stand behind the physics. The body of a bass guitar is too small of an acoustic chamber to move enough air to be heard at low frequencies. In the end, pitch is the frequency of the sound wave, and volume is the amplitude. In order to have a large amplitude at low frequency (and thus perceived as "loud"), you have to move more air, and a flat top ABG does not have enough sound chamber volume to push the volume of air necessary to produce a loud tone at low frequencies. If I am wrong, prove it experimentally. Right now your evidence is a picture of a bass guitar and a dead youtube link. If you are going to say that there is an ABG that defies physics, bring it. It isn't like anyone in this thread has it out for the ABG and wants to smear it. If someone (you) can find or build an ABG that is loud enough to keep up with an acoustic band, let it come forth. I will buy it. It would make my life so much easier. But fundamentally, even in your own post you say you need a small amp in some situations. This is all anyone has ever said. An ABG needs an amp to be heard, therefore it is not loud enough on it own.
__________________
Bourgeois Aged Tone Vintage D Gibson CS 1958 Les Paul Std. Reissue Mason-Dixon FE 44 Combo Amp Last edited by posternutbag; 07-20-2016 at 11:51 AM. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
You say in your last post that you have a Kingman that gives you an "approximation" of the bass sound, and that you are happy with that. That's fine. I am just saying that if you are willing to spend money acoustic bass's do work and produce a different sound that is every bit as good as a fine acoustic guitar (and think how much people are prepared to spend on a handmad acoustic).
I meant no offence by my post, and my comment that some comments are just repeating rubbish was tongue in cheek. But it does seem that the same reasons for not owning one are churned out again and again by people who have only played modestly priced instruments. And yes, I do know what ubiquitous means thanks very much! And my point was that, not just in bluegrass, but also in a lot of folk music over here in the uk, makes use of the double bass. I would love to hear a bit more acoustic guitar bass. Anyway, no offence meant- I'm enjoying my Brook very much, and I find it a very inspiring instrument. The information I was trying to put across is that if people want an acoustic bass, a good luthier should be able to build one that will give immense enjoyment. No, it's not going to hold its own up against a typical Bluegrass band without an amp. Robbie |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It would be fantastic if I could find an acoustic bass guitar that was loud enough to compete with my mandolin and a banjo, or even a dreadnought. If I could find one, I could give it to a guitar player (who are ubiquitous) and my bass issues would be solved. I have been on the search for such an instrument since about 2004. I have tried Martins, Breedloves, a Tacoma Thunderchief, a Dean, some of them relatively expensive, and none had enough volume. I keep a cheap Fender around because I didn't find that it was significantly lacking compared to more expensive models that I have tried, but if there was something that was significantly better, I would buy it and use it. People (myself included) love the concept of an ABG. If someone could solve the volume problem (without an amp), they would have a very valuable commodity. I think even an expensive ABG (say $2000+ US) would sell very well for festivals and touring bands.
__________________
Bourgeois Aged Tone Vintage D Gibson CS 1958 Les Paul Std. Reissue Mason-Dixon FE 44 Combo Amp |