The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > PLAY and Write

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 08-14-2022, 11:11 AM
Andyrondack Andyrondack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Albion
Posts: 1,220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick-slo View Post
It shows 4/4 like most of us have posted already.
The original question was more specific than just 'what is the time signature?'
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-14-2022, 11:15 AM
Andyrondack Andyrondack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Albion
Posts: 1,220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyeetime View Post
I don't think I've seen the bass clef symbol on the treble staff before, why is that?
No idea, I never saw that before either.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-14-2022, 04:31 PM
JonPR JonPR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,473
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyeetime View Post
I guess it is simpler than I thought, but I detect a slight pause on the 3 and 4 it just doesn't seem like straight forward eighth notes.
I just checked it out. It's one full 4/4 bar in straight 8ths.

It may be Charlie's two off-beat snare hits (on 3-and and 4-and) that are throwing you - but they are right on the 8ths between the beats.

After the intro, the tempo does wobble a little. My software measures the intro as 105 bpm, the next bar as 104, then it picks up to around 108. Charlie's snare is behind the beat too - that's the Stones' "swagger". He was a jazz drummer, not a drum machine...
__________________
"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in." - Leonard Cohen.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-14-2022, 05:11 PM
Tyeetime Tyeetime is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonPR View Post
I just checked it out. It's one full 4/4 bar in straight 8ths.

It may be Charlie's two off-beat snare hits (on 3-and and 4-and) that are throwing you - but they are right on the 8ths between the beats.

After the intro, the tempo does wobble a little. My software measures the intro as 105 bpm, the next bar as 104, then it picks up to around 108. Charlie's snare is behind the beat too - that's the Stones' "swagger". He was a jazz drummer, not a drum machine...
it is one of the things I love about the Stones, and not everyone can pull it off.
Brown Sugar starts around 110bpm and ends up around 125.
__________________
Martin D-15M
Martin LX1R
Les Paul Standard
Epiphone Dot
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-15-2022, 05:03 AM
Andyrondack Andyrondack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Albion
Posts: 1,220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyeetime View Post
it is one of the things I love about the Stones, and not everyone can pull it off.
Brown Sugar starts around 110bpm and ends up around 125.
Uh?? Lots of people myself included do that without trying or even realising untill reviewing a recording. Personally I consider it a drawback.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-15-2022, 04:43 PM
JonPR JonPR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,473
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyeetime View Post
it is one of the things I love about the Stones, and not everyone can pull it off.
Brown Sugar starts around 110bpm and ends up around 125.
Not quite true. It starts at 125 and ends up around 130. Not too bad.
But it probably happens with most bands most of the time, at least when playing live. Live performances often start faster than a studio version and then speed up! It's a natural result of adrenalin on stage. Your brain is in a different gear, and you don't realise.
Good bands can hold it back - at least if they're aware of the issue - but it can still happen.

The most extreme example I know is actually a studio recording: Herbie Hancock's Chameleon, which starts at 94 and ends around 114. It's a gradual acceleration throughout the whole 15 minutes, and I've often wondered if it was planned that way...
__________________
"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in." - Leonard Cohen.

Last edited by JonPR; 08-15-2022 at 05:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-15-2022, 05:39 PM
Bob from Brooklyn Bob from Brooklyn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hamilton Square, NJ
Posts: 4,107
Default

Somebody put a timer on Cinnamon Girl.
__________________
Martin D18
Gibson J45
Martin 00015sm
Gibson J200
Furch MC Yellow Gc-CR SPA
Guild G212
Eastman E2OM-CD
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-15-2022, 05:57 PM
Tyeetime Tyeetime is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonPR View Post
Not quite true. It starts at 125 and ends up around 130. Not too bad.
But it probably happens with most bands most of the time, at least when playing live. Live performances often start faster than a studio version and then speed up! It's a natural result of adrenalin on stage. Your brain is in a different gear, and you don't realise.
Good bands can hold it back - at least if they're aware of the issue - but it can still happen.

The most extreme example I know is actually a studio recording: Herbie Hancock's Chameleon, which starts at 94 and ends around 114. It's a gradual acceleration throughout the whole 15 minutes, and I've often wondered if it was planned that way...
Yeah my mistake, I was thinking of Honky Tonk Women. Far more drastic than Brown Sugar.
__________________
Martin D-15M
Martin LX1R
Les Paul Standard
Epiphone Dot
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > PLAY and Write

Thread Tools





All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=