#1
|
|||
|
|||
Which tone do you like better?
Hey guys,
Here is a quick video of me playing my two acoustics back to back. First one is a Collings D2H Traditional, Sitka top, non torrefied. The second one is a Gibson Historic Banner J-45 re-issue. Adirondack top and torrefied. I’m trying to decide which one to keep. I think I’m a one acoustic type of guy. Let me know what you think. Sorry for the link. It works perfect but not sure how to have it show up right in the thread. https://vimeo.com/437653513 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Either or
Sounds similar to me If that is typical of the way you play, It would adapt to a OM or 000 Better than a dread. (My opinion only)
__________________
Classical guitars, flat top steel string A few banjos and mandolins Accrued over 59 years of playing |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The Collins is very articulate and focused. Everything just projects straight forward beautifully. The J-45 is warm, mellow and woody. An absolutely gorgeous tone. I’d take the J-45 growl all day long, that is an awesome guitar.
__________________
'59 Gibson J-45 "Spot" '21 Gibson LG-2 - 50's Reissue '94 Taylor 710 '18 Martin 000-17E "Willie" ‘23 Taylor AD12e-SB '22 Taylor GTe Blacktop '15 Martin 000X1AE https://pandora.app.link/ysqc6ey22hb |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Absolutely couldn't go wrong with either. Just keep both and play that one that is calling you.
I'm came to the same conclusion as Goat Mick, the Collins has a very nice modern sound with the notes crisp and clear that just pop off the strings, but there's just something about a nice Gibson. It has such a very warm, woody voice to it, just makes you just want to play all day long. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I suggest you keep the Gibson for your style of play. It was warm, wooden, mellow, and good midrange, not scooped.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
For what you're playing in that clip -- I'd say the Gibson. Sounds warm and really sweet. Kinda breaks your heart, in a good way.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Townes would have preferred the Gibson.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is this different from the other post you have???
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Keep the Gibson.
__________________
I'm learning to flatpick and fingerpick guitar to accompany songs. I've played and studied traditional noter/drone mountain dulcimer for many years. And I used to play dobro in a bluegrass band. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
The two threads should be merged somehow. I'm confused.
__________________
Barry My SoundCloud page Avalon L-320C, Guild D-120, Martin D-16GT, McIlroy A20, Pellerin SJ CW Cordobas - C5, Fusion 12 Orchestra, C12, Stage Traditional Alvarez AP66SB, Seagull Folk Aria {Johann Logy}: |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I'm sorry I didn't realize I made two threads, I attempted to edit the title and must have posted a duplicate. Apologies for that.
Thank you for all the replies. I really do love both guitars but one should go. That is typical for my playing. I play a lot of Steve Earle, Townes, Blaze Foley Etc. So lot's of finger style. I understand a 000/OM might be better suited but the J-45 is very light and I've got big long orangutang arms so it doesn't bother me too much. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Very nice playing. These are both iconic guitars that most guitarists would love to have. They both sound great. Even though they both sounded quite similar I would keep both, to play and admire, if you can.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
depends on the sound you like. When I played with a choral group the gibson was great but if your going to play for yourself the Collings does more. I think different guitars do different things. Theres more guitar with the Collings but you might like or need the more muted sound the Gibson has.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Def the Gibson. It has a nice, warm tone.
__________________
"It's only castles burning." - Neil Young |