The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 02-20-2020, 06:57 PM
Wade Hampton Wade Hampton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chugiak, Alaska
Posts: 31,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RP View Post
...These Sophie's Choice scenarios can get a little silly.
I agree. It’s like the threads that show up every other week or so that ask:

“If you could keep only ONE of the guitars that you own, which one would you keep?”

And the ridiculous total unlikelyhood of that ever occurring is never explained. I always want to know the proposed back story for this bizarre “one guitar only” scenario.

I mean, does that mean that there’ll be some totalitarian government take over that confiscates all but one of your guitars?!? Or maybe there’s some sort of Guitar Rapture, where suddenly all of your guitars but one start levitating up into the stratosphere and beyond?

I mean, what’s the mechanism at work there? And why would any government or supernatural higher power want most of my guitars ANYWAY?!?



-




-




-





Sorry - I just had to get that off my chest...


Wade Hampton “Maybe I Think Too Much About This Stuff” Miller
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-20-2020, 07:19 PM
Joe Beamish Joe Beamish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Boerne, TX
Posts: 1,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wade Hampton View Post
I agree. It’s like the threads that show up every other week or so that ask:

“If you could keep only ONE of the guitars that you own, which one would you keep?”

And the ridiculous total unlikelyhood of that ever occurring is never explained. I always want to know the proposed back story for this bizarre “one guitar only” scenario.

I mean, does that mean that there’ll be some totalitarian government take over that confiscates all but one of your guitars?!? Or maybe there’s some sort of Guitar Rapture, where suddenly all of your guitars but one start levitating up into the stratosphere and beyond?

I mean, what’s the mechanism at work there? And why would any government or supernatural higher power want most of my guitars ANYWAY?!?



-




-




-





Sorry - I just had to get that off my chest...


Wade Hampton “Maybe I Think Too Much About This Stuff” Miller
I think these types of threads are no less interesting than the other threads that show up every week or two....which is pretty much all of them. They make me think, sort of.

For example, this thread made me realize that, part of the "playability" of my Backpacker is that I can take it along with me on business trips without looking like a self-absorbed douchebag in front of my clients, whom I travel with, and who don't notice its existence as we move through airports with our bags. In hotel rooms, I've written and learned a lot of music on that guitar, which has a pathetic, toy-like tone. But it's my friend. It's got its own version of playability.

Similarly, the "one guitar" question gets me thinking. Aside from my Backpacker, which I only play on business trips, I have only my OM, which is basically my one guitar. "One guitar" is a first for me, at least for a long time now. And I'm really digging it.

But I have nothing against the ever-recurring humidity threads either. I don't actually read them. (But I probably will, whenever I next relocate to a colder climate.)
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-20-2020, 07:39 PM
Dru Edwards Dru Edwards is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 43,430
Default

If I went somewhere, whether a friend's house or a campfire, and of the two guitars available to play I would choose playability. That's a very realistic situation.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-20-2020, 08:59 PM
Goodallboy Goodallboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: East TN
Posts: 6,847
Default

I have one acoustic guitar. I don't want another one simply because it wouldn't sound as good as the one I have.

The one I have and will always have, isn't the easiest guitar to play that I've ever had, it's the best sounding one I've ever had, or ever played.

So it's tone for me. I can expend the slight extra effort that some don't seem able willing to exert to have the best sound I can have.
__________________
McCollum Grand Auditorum Euro Spruce/Brazilian
PRS Hollowbody Spruce
PRS SC58
Giffin Vikta
Gibson Custom Shop ES 335 '59 Historic RI
‘91 Les Paul Standard
‘52 AVRI Tele - Richie Baxt build
Fender American Deluxe Tele
Fender Fat Strat
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-20-2020, 09:06 PM
Duck916 Duck916 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 170
Default

Playability. That's why I bought a Zager.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-20-2020, 09:13 PM
mcduffnw mcduffnw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D-utim View Post
If both factors couldn’t be accomplished in one guitar, which one do you prefer?

I can work around playability issues to varying degrees of success, but trying to create good tone out of a guitar that just has overall poor tone quality...IMO...is much more difficult if not sometimes impossible to pull off. So I would always take a guitar that has good tone but playability issues, over a guitar with good playability...for me...but poor tone.


duff
Be A Player...Not A Polisher
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-20-2020, 09:20 PM
justonwo's Avatar
justonwo justonwo is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,123
Default

A bit hypothetical because you can have both, but I’d rather have a guitar with great tone but sub-optimal playability. I can adjust to guitars that are harder to play, but find guitars with lousy tone uninspiring. Of course, it’s within limits. Are we talking totally unplayable? Or a little off?
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-20-2020, 10:36 PM
AcousticDreams AcousticDreams is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gadgetfreak View Post
I have 2016 Martin Hd28 I bought brand new. Tone is amazing and playability I'll give 6/10, I brought it to my luthier who is very good at what he does but tells me she's right where she should be and I just have a hard time playing anything other than straight barre chords and open chords.
My luthier tells me that the neck angle is perfect and the same with relief, he then tells me that's what makes certain guitars the one because they sound amazing and play 10/10 and that's why I should play as many guitars until I find that one.
While there is a great amount of truth in what your luthier told you, there is one area that often gets overlooked--Nut height.
I use to think the same thing...as my guitar sounded great but did not play very well. I should mention that I use a modified Medium gauge strings. Slightly heavier. You would be surprised at how many guitars have too high a nut height.
One easy way to tell, is if when you depress single notes and bar chords at at the 6 to 10th frets if they play easier. If they do, then it is a possibility that you Nut height to fretboard distance is set a bit too high. Just a few thousands can make a huge difference. It did for myself.
A simple Spark plug gauge set at the automotive store for under $5, and you can measure exactly the distances of the bottom of the string to the fretboard. Of course, it also depends on the height of your frets. And it will take some research on your part to see what peoples opinion is on Fret height.
All I can say is it made my guitar play so much easier. Saddle height is one factor, Neck relief is another...but Nut height also makes a big difference.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-20-2020, 11:23 PM
Steel and wood Steel and wood is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 2,752
Default

I can pick up a guitar with a ton of tone but if it doesn't feel right (or even appeal to me visually) then I'm not taking it home.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 02-20-2020, 11:56 PM
Jaden Jaden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,960
Default

For me, playability always leads to good tone, as in pleasing music. I can always find the “sweet spot” of most well constructed and set-up instruments, whereas tone considered on its own is so much “pie in the sky” with connotations of the guitar producing the music for you on its own, without any effort - it’s a cop out, or at least, maybe only a virtue that can be rightfully claimed by the builder of the instrument.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 02-20-2020, 11:57 PM
phavriluk phavriluk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Granby, CT
Posts: 2,952
Default

This sounds to me like a solution looking for a problem. I think that playability and tone are two different and just-about-unrelated qualities. Tone is the noise the box makes, playability is the work product of the artist who adjusted the guitar (nut, relief, saddle) to the satisfaction of the owner. A guitar can sound angelic when the strings are plucked, but be a beast to play. The beast can be tamed. Angels are in short supply beyond those originally issued with the guitar and what they do doesn't much respond to supplication.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 02-21-2020, 12:14 AM
Glennwillow Glennwillow is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Coastal Washington State
Posts: 45,081
Default

Playability vs. tone?

I have to have both. My experience is that when I find a guitar that sounds really good, it can be made playable. And making a guitar more playable makes it sound better because it's easier to play well.

- Glenn
__________________
My You Tube Channel
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 02-21-2020, 12:29 AM
s2y s2y is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Somewhere middle America
Posts: 6,598
Default

If I had to pick, playability. I like playing leads above the 5th fret. Fortunately, I have some great guitars with killer tone and playability.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 02-21-2020, 06:48 AM
whvick whvick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,565
Default

I want to say it is both, but I am suspicious that my ear is not really discerning. Therefore I may lean a little more toward playability.
I am thinking about trading my D-15 for something with a neck that feels better. Maybe a 1.75 instead of the 1 11/16. Or I may even try a 1.8 Seagull or custom made.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 02-21-2020, 07:49 AM
jaymarsch jaymarsch is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North of the Golden Gate, South of the Redwoods, East of the Pacific and West of the Sierras
Posts: 10,607
Default

It is a guitar to guitar decision for me. But, if I cannot find a comfortable way to play cleanly then I will not get the tone that the guitar offers. I have one of the most beautiful sounding guitars on consignment right now because the scale length and neck specs are just beyond my capabilities. I bought the guitar for the tone. My solution was to sell the guitar and have the same maker build one for me that dialed in my preferred neck specs. I am fortunate to have three wonderful guitars that are outstanding in both tone and playability.

Best,
Jayne
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Thread Tools





All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=