The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-29-2009, 09:25 AM
jimmy bookout jimmy bookout is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: charlotte, n.c.
Posts: 2,806
Default Fishman Aura Spectrum-a review

I took part in the Fishman Aura Spectrum beta test program (thanks again to Joe Barbieri and Dave Fournier) and now that the unit is offically announced, here's my review of it. The Aura Spectrum answers the main reason I never bought an Aura pedal before, even though I had tried them and liked them a great deal. I use 2 guitars (and an ukulele!) on a lot of gigs, a Collings 000-2H and a Ted Ramsay Classical, both guitars have under saddle transducers only. The thought of plugging and unplugging 2 different boxes didn't have much appeal. The Aura Spectrum combines all the other Aura Image pedals into one (Dread, orchestra, nylon,etc) with 16 images per guitar type. It differs from the other Aura Image pedals in that it has 3 bands of EQ, a very well executed feedback control that truly gets the offending note without killing everything around it, phase, tuner, blend (Spectrum/Pickup level), trim, compressor, and volume. It looks similar to other Aura pedals, just bigger. It is very well built with 1/4 inch and XLR out, FX loop, and can be powered by battery (1-9V) or AC. Also, the 3 EQ controls have a detent at 12:00 (Flat) which is helpful. Also, all the controls move with a nicely damped feel to them (like the controls on my wife's Audi!).

And the sound: For all of us that have been playing and attempting (?!) to amplify acoustic guitars (in my case, 20+ years), this box is the ticket. When I got the Aura Spectrum from Joe, I sat in my livingroom and plugged in (Centaur Acoustic P.A. amp) and started experimenting, one guitar at a time. My method was to set the trim level for the guitar, set the guitar type (Nylon, concert, etc), set EQ flat, set the blend all the way to the right (5:00 if you will) so that I am getting the Aura Spectrum only with no pickup tone (we all know what piezo pickups sound like!), set the compressor at 12:00 and then start with Image #1. I had pad/pen and made notes on what I liked or disliked about the particular image, and then moved on to the next one. After the first round, I had a smaller list of images and repeated the process again, and on and on until I had a winner. This process took about an hour per guitar, and I played the same tune each time. At this point, all that's left is a little tweaking of EQ (on all my guitars,I ended up Flat on High/Low and a little out on the Mid on one of the steel strings, the other guitars are all flat. I find Fishman's recommendation on Blend levels to be spot on, which are 10:00 (or about 60% pickup, if that makes sense) in live situations and anywhere from 12:00 (50/50 Spectrum/Pickup) to all the way up (5:00) (all Aura Spectrum) when recording. This pedal, for me, is the Answer I have been looking for since I started blowing (throwing) money away on pickups/preamps/effects/etc 2 decades ago. I could have that Monteleone Radio Flyer for all the money I spent! The first time I used it live, Tom, my pal and playing partner, looked over at me and said: "After all these years, that's what a plugged in acoustic guitar should sound like". What the Aura Spectrum does for a nylon string guitar is amazing. It gives the trebles great presence and definition, eliminating the "tubby" sound (especially the G string), the basses sound natural and NO quack. On a steel string, the trebles get that shimmer without, as Leo Kottke calls it, "jang and tingle", that tinny, junky sound that I used to deal with by taking ALL the treble out on the preamp and the board. The basses sound like your guitar sounds (go figure) and again, the duck is dead. All in all, this box is the deal, IMO.

There you have it, a great box and very well thought out. I highly recommend you try one out when you can.

Jimmy
__________________
Avian Skylark
Pono 0000-30
Gardiner Parlor
Kremona Kiano
Ramsay Hauser
Cordoba C10
Chris Walsh Archtop
Gardiner Concert
Taylor Leo Kottke
Gretsch 6120
Pavan TP30
Aria A19c
Hsienmo MJ

Ukuleles:
Cocobolo 5 string Tenor
Kanilea K3 Koa
Kanilea K1 Walnut Tenor
Kala Super Tenor
Rebel Super Concert
Nehemiah Covey Tenor
Mainland Mahogany Tenor
Mainland Cedar/Rosewood Tenor

Last edited by jimmy bookout; 07-30-2009 at 07:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-29-2009, 09:49 AM
SpruceTop SpruceTop is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 12,357
Default

Jimmy,

Thanks for the great review of the new Fishman Aura Spectrum! I've loved all the various renditions of the Fishman Aura system. I have the original Aura Imaging Blender, an Aura Dreadnought Pedal and a Martin DC-28E with Ellipse Aura and a Martin DC-16RE AURA with Onboard Aura. I think the Fishman Aura system is the best live-sound reinforcement guitar pickup/preamp system out there bar none and it's great for recording too!

Although I've been touting Fishman Aura products for a couple of years on this board and others, it seems many players who've never tried a Fishman Aura setup don't want to believe the results that can be obtained from these products. Use an Aura product and gone is the menagerie of dual-pickup systems and outboard EQ pedals and this and that and the other thing! The new Fishman Aura Spectrum looks like the best Aura pedal yet and I'm going to buy one when they become available.

Regards,

SpruceTop
__________________
Martin HD-28 Sunburst/Trance M-VT Phantom
Martin D-18/UltraTonic
Adamas I 2087GT-8
Ovation Custom Legend LX
Guild F-212XL STD
Huss & Dalton TD-R
Taylor 717e
Taylor 618e
Taylor 614ce
Larrivee D-50M/HiFi
Larrivee D-40R Blue Grass Special/HiFi
Larrivee D-40R Sunburst
Larrivee C-03R TE/Trance M-VT Phantom
RainSong BI-DR1000N2
Emerald X20
Yamaha FGX5
Republic Duolian/Schatten NR-2

Last edited by SpruceTop; 08-13-2009 at 01:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-29-2009, 01:22 PM
john57classic john57classic is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DFW area
Posts: 791
Default

Thanks but it doesn't sound like that much of a step up from the original blender. Might save a little time since the blender only holds 16 images, but you generally only find a couple that work with your guitar anyway. Then you can download a bunch for a different type of guitar etc. The blender had the other features you discussed and the capability to store various images/programs that you could toggle through say if you went from pick to fingerstyle and wanted some differnt compression or higher output gain.

Are there "tech spec" type things or other sound technology improvements over the orginal blender?

Thanks again
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-29-2009, 01:46 PM
rmyAddison rmyAddison is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Addison, TX
Posts: 19,007
Default

Even though I have migrated back to microphones any time I can use them my OMC-Aura has a lot of stage time under its belt.

I was wondering when the Image Blender replacement was coming out, is the Aura Spectrum 32 bit?

Will definitely check out the new Aura Spectrum when my GC gets them, thanks for the review............
__________________
Rich - rmyAddison

Rich Macklin Soundclick Website
http://www.youtube.com/rmyaddison

Martin OM-18 Authentic '33 Adirondack/Mahogany
Martin CS OM-28 Alpine/Madagascar
Martin CS 00-42 Adirondack/Madagascar
Martin OM-45TB (2005) Engelmann/Tasmanian Blackwood (#23 of 29)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-29-2009, 02:20 PM
Joe Barbieri Joe Barbieri is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 262
Default

Hi Folks,

Here is some info on the Spectrum that may be helpful:

Award-winning AuraŽ Acoustic Imaging

128 pre-loaded Images for use with the most
popular acoustic instruments

Instrument Preamp with Balanced XLR D.I. out

Volume, Blend, and Image Select controls

Three band EQ

One-knob compressor

Automatic anti-feedback with up to 3 notch locations

Built-in chromatic tuner with bypass/mute

16 user-configurable Image locations

USB interface for Image downloading from
Aura Image Gallery (software included)

Feedback-fighting Phase switch

Automatic D.I. Ground Lift

9-Volt Battery or optional adaptor operation


Specs:

AUDIO I/O:

1/4" mono input & output w/input trim control

Balanced XLR D.I.

1/4" effects loop

24-bit A/D/A conversion

PROCESSOR:

32 bit processing


POWER:9-Volt battery or optional adaptor power

BATTERY LIFE:20 hours
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-29-2009, 02:51 PM
sdelsolray sdelsolray is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 6,955
Default

Good. Hopefully, the newer design results in sonic improvements over the earlier products.

Joe: Any further word on whether the product will be released as a software plugin for studio use in, say, VST, RTAS, DirectX and AU formats?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-29-2009, 03:53 PM
Doubleneck Doubleneck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,433
Default

Any word of price?
__________________
Steve
2020 McKnight Grand Recording - Cedar Top
2005 McKnight SS Dred
2001 Michael Keller Koa Baby
2014 Godin Inuk
2012 Deering B6 Openback Banjo
2012 Emerald Acoustic Doubleneck
2012 Rainsong JM1000 Black Ice
2009 Wechter Pathmaker 9600 LTD
1982 Yairi D-87 Doubleneck
1987 Ovation Collectors
1993 Ovation Collectors
1967 J-45 Gibson
1974 20th Annivers. Les Paul Custom
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-12-2009, 08:32 AM
guitaniac guitaniac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,713
Default

Very, very cool - sixteen image locations where custom sound images can be stored, or (alternatively) already-available sound images can be downloaded from the Aura Sound Image Library. Add the 128 preset sound images (for a variety of body styles) to that and this DI will be a great bargain for Aura users with multiple UST-equipped guitars in a variety of body styles.

The only thing missing, from my perspective, is sweepable midrange capability for the mid tone control. What can I say, Joe. My Fishman Platinum Pro EQ preamp has spoiled me rotten.

Gary
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-12-2009, 08:45 AM
Joe F's Avatar
Joe F Joe F is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Concord (Charlotte) NC
Posts: 4,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guitaniac View Post
The only thing missing, from my perspective, is sweepable midrange capability for the mid tone control. What can I say, Joe. My Fishman Platinum Pro EQ preamp has spoiled me rotten.

Gary
I'd have to echo that. I have found the sweepable verses fixed mid range control to be one of the most useful features of my Baggs PADI, Acoustimax, and K4.

Still, the Spectrum sounds very promising!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-13-2009, 11:36 AM
urlkonig urlkonig is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 155
Default

Thank you for the review. I've been using one of the Aura pedals for a while now, and I'm constantly asked by other guitarists how I get "that acoustic sound." It's not perfect by any means -- but very few live situations offer the opportunity for "perfect" sound reinforcement. For the average gigging situation, I'm very pleased with what the Aura pedals can do, and can't wait get the Spectrum.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-18-2009, 08:47 AM
guitaniac guitaniac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,713
Default

I sprang for the Aura Spectrum DI this morning. The means to access and experiment with hundreds of sound images (for a variety of acoustic guitar types and body styles) was just too tempting to resist.

I have to give the Fishman folks credit for winning me over. There was a time when I was pretty skeptical about Fishman gear. As recently as three years ago, I sold a nice Walden guitar at a big loss because I couldn't tolerate the quackiness (with hard strumming) of the Fishman Eclipse system in it. More recently, however, I've been very pleased with my Fishman SoloAmp, my Fishman Platinum Pro EQ preamp and the Fishman onboard Aura pickup system in my little Cort guitar. (The onboard Aura system has adjustable gain to accomodate hard strumming.) I'm hoping that the Fishman Aura Spectrum DI will continue my winning streak with Fishman.

Gary
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-19-2009, 09:58 AM
Churchman Churchman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Crystal Lake, IL 60014
Posts: 35
Default

Gary,

I too sprang for the new AURA to add to my vast array of pedals. After all, my birthday is coming up this week so it gives me a good reason to buy something!!!!

I've got a question though.....

I've been using the M1 passive for the most part. It's a love/hate relationship with the M1, Dread AURA and LR Baggs PADI, which is what my signal chain is. My question is, should I be running the M1 thru the Baggs and then the AURA or vice versa. Funny that I haven't experimented with this first. I use the Baggs to knock out some of the edgey mids.

Also, I have an active M1 as well. Wonder if that would sound better than the M1 passive. Guess that I will just have to experiment.

I think that I do agree though that the AURA sounds better thru a UST than a soundhole pickup. I've just never put one in my J45 which is my main guitar.

Churchman
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-19-2009, 11:24 AM
sventvkg sventvkg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 149
Default

This new spectrum is close to the original Aura Blender that I owned for years. I'd have to check it out.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-19-2009, 06:04 PM
guitaniac guitaniac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,713
Default

Hi Churchman,

I usually put the EQ device first in the signal chain, when using my DTAR Mama Bear digital processor. With my onboard Aura-equipped Cort guitar, however, I have no choice but to place the EQ device (parametric EQ or sweepable mid EQ) after the Aura. It seems to work fine, certainly better than using the onboard Aura's fixed-mid (at 1KHz) tone control. (My little Cort seems to prefer a mid cut around 1.5KHz.)

In your particular case, putting the Para DI before the Aura pedal would be best - not only because of the EQ thing, but also because you'll want to buffer and boost the passive M1 signal before feeding the signal to the Aura pedal (making sure that the Aura pedal's trim control is set low enough that its not being overdriven). My guess is that the Aura pedals were designed primarily to accomodate active pickup systems. I recall reading somewhere that they don't work particularly well with a weak passive input signal.

Regarding the M1, I never did manage to get satisfactory results using Mama Bear with that pickup. I presume that the M1's top-responsive quality made it somewhat incompatable with Mama Bear (which is designed for use with USTs and string sensing mags). Perhaps the Aura can be more compatable (than Mama Bear) with an M1-equipped guitar. There certainly are a great many sound images which can be auditioned in the search for a good match. It should be noted, however, that the Aura technology (like Mama Bear) is designed to be used with USTs and string sensing mags, not top-sensing pickups (which the M1 is, to some extent). While it may be possible to get lucky with one or more of the sound images, its not a sure thing.

Regarding using the Aura with a J45, I recently ran sound for a young player using an Aura pedal with a beautiful old Gibson J45 (originally his father's guitar) which was equipped with a passive Fishman Neo-D humbucker. He was certainly getting a good sound with that combo, although it must also be noted that he was using a Fishman Platinum Pro EQ preamp (to EQ, buffer and boost the signal) between the passive Neo-D humbucker and the Aura pedal.

Hope that helps,
Gary

Last edited by guitaniac; 08-19-2009 at 06:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-20-2009, 06:45 AM
Dank Dank is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 321
Default

The acoustic side of my stage rig is an Anderson Crowdster>L.R. Baggs Para DI>Bose L1. Does anyone know if the Aura imaging complements the Crowdster?
__________________
Taylor:K65CE;GSMC;XXX-BE;818e.Gibson: Sheryl Crow, '59 LP, Flamed 335; Froggy F-12& Dread. Martin D-41;Anderson: Crowdster and Cobra Tele.Parker: Mojo Bubinga.Suhr: Mary Kaye and Butterscotch T;PRS:Custom 24 10 Top; SC; 513 10 Top;DGT; Paul's Guitar; Studio Ten Top. Hamer: Talladego. Epi :Lennon Rev;Fender:'62 J Bass, '65 AVRI, '76 Strat, 50th Ann. Strat, '62 Jazz .
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=