The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-26-2020, 07:11 PM
eyesore eyesore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,506
Default OM28 and CEO-7

Hi , I have the OM28 Martin but am interested in this CEO-7. Is it a smaller body? I am looking for a "sweet" small body guitar ; especially a Sunburst Model. [all of the sudden I've been craving a sunburst acoustic.$2000 range.Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-26-2020, 07:19 PM
hairpuller hairpuller is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 3,012
Default

I had a CEO7 for awhile and loved everything about it but the neck. Beautiful guitar in every way. I sometimes wonder if I had it back would the neck still be a problem?

You should be able to pick up a nice used one easily under 2k.

Best,
scott
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-26-2020, 07:31 PM
Matts67 Matts67 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 1,205
Default

I had a CEO-7 and currently have an OM-28 Modern Deluxe, so I was able to compare the two directly quite a bit. The CEO-7 simply doesn't compare to the OM28 MD in terms of overall tone and responsiveness. But, for a 00 sized guitar, especially if you're after a drier mahogany tone, the CEO-7 is really hard to beat. I think it would boil down to rosewood vs mahogany, but for me the OM28 seems more versatile overall and with the way mine is set up, it's just as easy to play.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-26-2020, 07:43 PM
eyesore eyesore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,506
Default

yeah ,well I do prefer Rosewood. but looking at body size ,it looks a little smaller. That is something I am after.Any thoughts on smaller body guitars?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-26-2020, 07:43 PM
jklotz jklotz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,561
Default

I love the neck on the CEO 7. I've probably played 5 or 6 of them at this point. I really wanted to like the guitar because I like the neck and the size so much, but they have all sounded kind of muted and dull to me. I guess that is just not the style I gravitate towards?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-26-2020, 08:17 PM
zmf zmf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 7,681
Default

I've played two CEO-7's in the last 10 years, and besides a nice 000-28VS, I have bought it, but already had a guitar that covered that genre space.

Give it some thought.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-26-2020, 09:28 PM
Llewlyn Llewlyn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: San Francisco (CA)
Posts: 346
Default

I own both. OM-28 has a better tone imo, but CEO-7 has superb playability. Love that neck.

Ll.
__________________
Martin OM-28 1931 Authentic | Martin CEO-7
Taylor GS Mini Mahogany | Logan Custom Telecaster
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-26-2020, 09:32 PM
Slothead56 Slothead56 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SE PA
Posts: 2,916
Default

I’ve owned 2 CEO-7s. The first was very dull sounding and I sold it within weeks. The second, which was used, sounded better. I played it a lot and gigged it a little. It was A very cool vibe guitar. Ultimately though it was too dry sounding for me and I sold it. I’m just a rosewood guy.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-26-2020, 11:28 PM
canyongargon canyongargon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 186
Default

Try looking at the X braced Waterloo WL-14. Can’t recommend it enough, my example is easily one of the very best acoustic guitars I’ve ever played.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-27-2020, 04:38 AM
M19's Avatar
M19 M19 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes
Posts: 8,553
Default

Think about a 00-28. They can be had (used) for your number, or a little more. Maury's has a new one that at 60% would be $2339.
__________________
Marty
Twin Cities AGF Group on FB
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-27-2020, 05:26 AM
eyesore eyesore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,506
Default

Ok , thanks for the advice. That's why I come here .I have a feeling I will be disappointed in this guitar .Stick with my OM28.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-27-2020, 05:29 AM
Peter Z Peter Z is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,423
Default

I have the poor mans OM-28, an OM-21, and a CEO-7.
I think they are quite different, so in my opinion a comparison doesn't make a lot of sense. For sure the OM-21 is more versatile but the CEO-7 is a dream of a guitar. Definately not dull. Playability is great on both guitars but obviously still a little easier on the CEO-7.

If I had only one guitar, it would be the OM, but I would miss the CEO badly, very badly. They are brother and sister and belong together!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-27-2020, 06:26 AM
UncleJesse's Avatar
UncleJesse UncleJesse is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: STL
Posts: 4,094
Default

I had a ceo7 and sold it to buy an custom adirondack om28. I really liked the ceo7 but ultimately the string spacing was too much and I always thought it sounded a little plinky on the high E and B strings. The custom OM28 is just a better all-around guitar for me. I am curious how a mod-v 1 3/4" neck with 2 5/32" bridge string spacing would feel like. I'm don't know of any Martin that has that spec on any models, do they?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-27-2020, 10:17 AM
AgentKooper AgentKooper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 958
Default OM28 and CEO-7

I have the Blueridge version of an OM-28 as well as an 00-18. I owned a CEO-7 for about a year. It was a great sounding and very playable guitar, and a great complement to the OM. I loved its looks too. In the end I sold it, but only because it really occupied the same niche for me as the 00-18, and I liked the 00-18 a bit more. I just couldn’t really justify keeping both and the 00-18 won out.

I love having both an OM and an 00, and I think the right CEO would go great with your OM-28. Quite different guitars, IMO.

And to answer your question, yes, the CEO is a smaller body. Also shorter scale.
__________________
Martin CS-00-18 (2015)
Martin OM-28V (2011)
Northfield Model M mandolin
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-28-2020, 12:33 AM
dukebrot dukebrot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 186
Default

I have an OM-21 and a 00-18V. I have also played many OM-28's and CEO 7's. As much as I wanted to love every CEO 7 I have played, I have yet to find one that really stands out to me. That being said, I agree that the CEO 7 and the OM-28 are different beasts (00 vs. 000 size, short scale vs. long scale, mahogany vs. rosewood). I could definitely see having a CEO 7 and an OM-28.

All that being said, I personally would get an 00-18V or 00-18 before a CEO 7 just based on my own experience with both. I'd also try a Waterloo WL-14X before buying a CEO 7 if you really like that shape and a sunburst top. Back to back I have always preferred the Waterloo to the CEO 7 when I have had the chance to play both.

But of course this is all *very* subjective and your mileage may vary.

Good luck!

Dave
__________________
Martin D-35, OM-21, 00-18V, Dread Jr.
Waterloo WL-14 XTR
Blueridge BR-163
Orangewood Oliver Jr. Mahogany
Gretsch Jim Dandy and...
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=