The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 03-25-2019, 01:37 PM
jonfields45 jonfields45 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 4,606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuitarLuva View Post
I, like you, first installed the pickup in a carbon guitar. While I was happy with what I was hearing I had to boost the bass and cut the trebles. It wasn't until I read some info on different install mediums producing different tone that I gave the putty a try. To my amazement, the putty install yielded the results I was looking for. All the bass that was missing was back and I was shocked. I got the same result in a wooden guitar. I'm still using both with no EQ so I really do suggest that you give the putty a chance, you might just get your wish.
I asked Les at Schatten about this exact option and he thought it would not make much of a difference. But it seems intuitive to this EE that a more flexible adhesive might absorb highs more than lows (my intuition is not as often right as I might like). However following that reasoning lower the total output too (like taking a K&K from cyanoacrylate to tape). What do you think? Did the putty seem to lower the total output?
__________________
jf45ir Free DIY Acoustic Guitar IR Generator
.wav file, 30 seconds, pickup left, mic right, open position strumming best...send to direct email below
I'll send you 100/0, 75/25, 50/50 & 0/100 IR/Bypass IRs
IR Demo, read the description too: https://youtu.be/SELEE4yugjE
My duo's website and my email... [email protected]

Jon Fields
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-25-2019, 06:26 PM
Rudy4 Rudy4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 8,936
Default

The greatest this week? Same as last week, and the week before, and the week before, and the week before...

K&K Pure Mini.

I figure if I have to acoustically filter the pickup by sticking it in a bed of goo to mount it then perhaps it's "not ready for prime time".
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-25-2019, 06:47 PM
GuitarLuva GuitarLuva is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 1,873
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonfields45 View Post
I asked Les at Schatten about this exact option and he thought it would not make much of a difference. But it seems intuitive to this EE that a more flexible adhesive might absorb highs more than lows (my intuition is not as often right as I might like). However following that reasoning lower the total output too (like taking a K&K from cyanoacrylate to tape). What do you think? Did the putty seem to lower the total output?
No not at all. While not night and day output difference I think I actually got a little more output with the putty. That might be due to the tonal differences but I'm not really sure. I think the putty transfers vibrations better than the tape. Maybe when I do my next install I'll do a little video of the tape vs putty. I still think you should try it as I'm 2 for 2 so far with the putty.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-25-2019, 07:16 PM
The Kid! The Kid! is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,649
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by varmonter View Post
I have a kk installed
in my guitars so i would have to scrape them
out before installing the hfn. Something im
not gonna do. For what seems like a lateral move.
.
I pulled two K&K's and replaced them with HFN passives. Not a lateral move at all IMO. The HFN is more natural sounding and doesn't have that K&K midrange bump that I'm always having to EQ out.
__________________
Current:
1952 Gibson J-45
- Schatten HFN passive / Fishman Matrix Infinity
1983 Washburn Timber Ridge Custom
- Fishman Onboard Prefix Premium Blend & - Schatten HFN passive
2016 Gibson J-45 Standard
- Fishman Onboard Prefix Premium Blend & - Schatten HFN passive backup
Tonedexter & Sunnaudio Stage DI
1990 Yamaha FS-310

Past:
1995 Martin D-28
2015 Eastman E10SS
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-25-2019, 11:29 PM
Vancebo Vancebo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Salem, Or.
Posts: 2,027
Default

Still the flavor of the week, month and the last few years for me is the Dazzo. I haven’t tried the Schatten, I am sure it’s great and all. I am happily epoxying my Dazzos in place because it sounds better than tape and putty. Sounds very natural, balanced on all strings every time, made to compliment the voice of your guitar so you start with a balanced sound with no need to use EQ to make corrections in your tone but just a little to tailor your sound to the room or situation. They run beautifully passive but I like them best through a Sunnaudio preamp. I have both on board version and an off board version as well. My Grace Alix is jealous and lonely because I never need to use it. And it’s a great one.

All other pickup manufacturers are probably going out of business because I stopped buying their pickups. I personally kept many of them afloat because of all the money I spent. 😁
__________________
Vancebo
Husband of One, Father of Two
Worship Leader, Music Teacher
Oregon Duck Fan
Guitars by: Collings, Bourgeois, Taylor
Pickups by: Dazzo
Preamps by: Sunnaudio
Amps by: Bose (S1)
Grateful
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-26-2019, 12:28 AM
Cuki79 Cuki79 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: France
Posts: 3,009
Default

Thanks Vancebo,

Can you precise "better" when comparing epoxy, tape and putty?

Is it louder? Or does it have more or less low/high end?

Cuki
__________________
Martin 00-18V Goldplus + internal mic (2003)
Martin OM-28V + HFN + internal mic (1999)
Eastman E6OM (2019) Trance Audio Amulet
Yamaha FGX-412 (1998)

Gibson Les Paul Standard 1958 Reissue (2013)
Fender Stratocaster American Vintage 1954 (2014)
http://acousticir.free.fr/
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-26-2019, 02:41 AM
SpruceTop SpruceTop is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 12,360
Default

I like the Trance Audio Amulet M-VT System. 'Nuff Said.
__________________
Martin HD-28 Sunburst/Trance M-VT Phantom
Martin D-18/UltraTonic
Adamas I 2087GT-8
Ovation Custom Legend LX
Guild F-212XL STD
Huss & Dalton TD-R
Taylor 717e
Taylor 618e
Taylor 614ce
Larrivee D-50M/HiFi
Larrivee D-40R Blue Grass Special/HiFi
Larrivee D-40R Sunburst
Larrivee C-03R TE/Trance M-VT Phantom
RainSong BI-DR1000N2
Emerald X20
Yamaha FGX5
Republic Duolian/Schatten NR-2
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-26-2019, 07:21 AM
hat hat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,372
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by varmonter View Post
.... Ask this question of 20 folks here and
youll get 20 different answers. .... The folks listening dont know or care to know..... Any improvements are for my ears.
This - the majority of the audience doesn't know or care. All of this effort is for our own gratification basically. Not a bad thing though, just what it is...
__________________
______________
---Tom H ---
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-26-2019, 07:50 AM
Vancebo Vancebo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Salem, Or.
Posts: 2,027
Default

Cuki, Tape and putty have less clarity for the Dazzo. It may be exactly what the HFN needs. The solid connection with the soundboard is what is best for the Dazzo.

I am in the middle of switching out Dazzos in each of my guitars to install a lower numbered Dazzo. I am going for less bass response in each of my guitars. So a 70 becomes a 60, etc. I will report about the process when I am done. It’s easy to pop off a pickup with a razor blade and then use a little epoxy remover on the epoxy residue, then a little scrape then 30 seconds to a minute of sanding then it’s reasy for the next install.

Go back and listen to Doug Young’s pickup test page and listen to the HFN and the latest Dazzo sample. Both have similar characteristics but the Dazzo seems to excel in mid range warmth. Some people may not like that sound. It’s a matter of personal taste. No microphones in either sample but it’s hard to tell.
__________________
Vancebo
Husband of One, Father of Two
Worship Leader, Music Teacher
Oregon Duck Fan
Guitars by: Collings, Bourgeois, Taylor
Pickups by: Dazzo
Preamps by: Sunnaudio
Amps by: Bose (S1)
Grateful
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-26-2019, 08:21 AM
varmonter varmonter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: The heart of Saturday night..
Posts: 3,645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vancebo View Post
Cuki, Tape and putty have less clarity for the Dazzo. It may be exactly what the HFN needs. The solid connection with the soundboard is what is best for the Dazzo.

I am in the middle of switching out Dazzos in each of my guitars to install a lower numbered Dazzo. I am going for less bass response in each of my guitars. So a 70 becomes a 60, etc. I will report about the process when I am done. It’s easy to pop off a pickup with a razor blade and then use a little epoxy remover on the epoxy residue, then a little scrape then 30 seconds to a minute of sanding then it’s reasy for the next install.

Go back and listen to Doug Young’s pickup test page and listen to the HFN and the latest Dazzo sample. Both have similar characteristics but the Dazzo seems to excel in mid range warmth. Some people may not like that sound. It’s a matter of personal taste. No microphones in either sample but it’s hard to tell.
Yes Its certainly subjective at best. I listened
to Doug youngs recording and The schatten is not my cup
of tea. I also keep reading how folks are dealing
with the sonic issues they are having. Not bad
issues just comments like dialing back this and
dialing back that. All correctable of course. But
it sounds like any other sbt ive tried.
I prefer SBT pickups to UST I just think
They sound better with less quack. But like
I stated above im not gonna scrape out my
kk for what seems like a lateral move. Ymmv
I mostly use mag pups these days when playing
with a band. Just tired of the issues at volume with sbts
But when I do a solo i like to use the kk and a mic.( sm81)
I like the sbts sound at lower volume levels.

Last edited by varmonter; 03-26-2019 at 08:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-26-2019, 08:13 PM
GuitarLuva GuitarLuva is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 1,873
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by varmonter View Post
Yes Its certainly subjective at best. I listened
to Doug youngs recording and The schatten is not my cup
of tea. I also keep reading how folks are dealing
with the sonic issues they are having. Not bad
issues just comments like dialing back this and
dialing back that. All correctable of course. But
it sounds like any other sbt ive tried.
I prefer SBT pickups to UST I just think
They sound better with less quack. But like
I stated above im not gonna scrape out my
kk for what seems like a lateral move. Ymmv
I mostly use mag pups these days when playing
with a band. Just tired of the issues at volume with sbts
But when I do a solo i like to use the kk and a mic.( sm81)
I like the sbts sound at lower volume levels.
The demo of the HFN on Doug's site is the older version of the pickup with the rosewood base. How different it is from the new one I do not know.

Tone is certainly a personal thing and I'm not here to tell people what they should be liking but I've owned k&k guitars before and while there's nothing wrong with the k&k it doesn't compare to the HFN in its mic like characteristics. It also required serious EQ to remove the boxy sound. I'm one of the few reporting that I don't need to EQ the HFN.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-27-2019, 01:12 AM
The Kid! The Kid! is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,649
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuitarLuva View Post
I'm one of the few reporting that I don't need to EQ the HFN.
I don't have to do much at all to the HFN to make it sound great. Maybe it's the install. No idea. I'm very pleased with it, and it doesn't bother me if other people prefer other pickups. I hope everyone finds something that they really dig.
__________________
Current:
1952 Gibson J-45
- Schatten HFN passive / Fishman Matrix Infinity
1983 Washburn Timber Ridge Custom
- Fishman Onboard Prefix Premium Blend & - Schatten HFN passive
2016 Gibson J-45 Standard
- Fishman Onboard Prefix Premium Blend & - Schatten HFN passive backup
Tonedexter & Sunnaudio Stage DI
1990 Yamaha FS-310

Past:
1995 Martin D-28
2015 Eastman E10SS
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-27-2019, 07:04 AM
GuitarLuva GuitarLuva is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 1,873
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Kid! View Post
I don't have to do much at all to the HFN to make it sound great. Maybe it's the install. No idea. I'm very pleased with it, and it doesn't bother me if other people prefer other pickups. I hope everyone finds something that they really dig.
Amen to that! It's a great pickup, all we can do is spread the word.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=