#1
|
|||
|
|||
Check out this guitar with removabe back & sides
Pretty wild bracing on this guitar. The video is in Spanish, but the demo is pretty cool.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
That's a nice demonstration of the importance of a Helmholtz resonator to stringed instrument design, eh? And a nice little guitar piece as well.
Bob
__________________
"It is said, 'Go not to the elves for counsel for they will say both no and yes.' " Frodo Baggins to Gildor Inglorion, The Fellowship of the Ring THE MUSICIAN'S ROOM (my website) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Demonstrates not just precision construction but the importance of the back and sides. They make an enclosed space for the sound of the strings and top to develop. I also think that the materials used for the b/s contributes some.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I wish I understood the narrative. I guess if I listened more carefully I might have understood some of it.
I wonder if the idea is that it can be used as a quiet practice instrument without the "resonator" and for performance with it. The structure supporting the top looks pretty massive by the standards of conventional guitar bracing. I don't have enough familiarity with classical guitars to know how to judge the sound, which is also difficult to do on a YouTube video. But it sounded pleasant to my ears. Interesting concept.
__________________
Bob DeVellis |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Not too informative about his "Modelo “Pampa” desarmable" in the video, but tells a little about him: http://guitarraslouzao.com/index_eng.htm
I thought it sounded pretty good. My experience in listening to lattice-braced classical guitars is that they tend to sound towards "lute-like", as did this one. The use of a rigid structural frame is not new, particularly with lattice bracing. What is a new idea is the removable back and side assembly and the bolt-on neck arrangement. Seems to work well. |