The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-28-2018, 02:25 AM
tegwen tegwen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 2
Default laminated v solid back and sides

What are peoples thoughts on laminated versus solid back and sides
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-28-2018, 03:02 AM
Paddy1951 Paddy1951 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,759
Default

Laminated:

- Usually less expensive
- Heavier
- Does not produce whatever the tonewood qualities are to as great an extent.
-Stronger


Solid:

- More expensive
- Lighter, sometimes considerably
- Reflects tonal qualities of ths body wood much better
- More prone to damage from impact

There are and have been some guitars made that defy these generalizations. Many laminated back and sides guitars sound quite good.

I think how lamination is done makes a very big difference. Three companies that do it well are Taylor, Seagull and its siblings (Godin ) and Yairi. There are others.

There can be other differences in build quality depending on brand such as fret work, quality of woods used and finish.
Very low end guitars use the least expensive materials and may have poorest craftsmanship.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-28-2018, 05:03 AM
thegazza thegazza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 214
Default

No hard and fast rules here other than to trust your own ears. A well designed and built guitar with laminate back and sides can still be a great guitar. The Yamaha FG / FS range is just one such example.

No 2 guitars are exactly the same. There are lots of great all solid guitars out there and some stinkers too.

Taylor have some silly prices on their lam b/s guitars in the UK and they're really nothing special. Much better guitars available for the same or less money. Yamaha, Martin and Faith offer superior all solid models for less than the 100 series and GS mini series.

Gazza
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-28-2018, 05:19 AM
Bax Burgess Bax Burgess is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SE PA
Posts: 2,482
Default

If I felt that 'brand X, model B with solid back&sides' was a little too gentle, not quite enough focus, I would try 'brand X, model B with laminate back&sides', or in the same line of thought 'brand X, model B cutaway, laminate or solid back&sides'. But I'm only working with my ears, so there it is.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-28-2018, 05:43 AM
slooky slooky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Niagara Ontario Canada
Posts: 658
Default

I only buy all solid guitars. I would never buy a laminate. Some guitar companies are making all solid for the same price as a plywood back and sides. Why would you go with laminate?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-28-2018, 06:05 AM
jim1960 jim1960 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 6,002
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slooky View Post
I only buy all solid guitars. I would never buy a laminate. Some guitar companies are making all solid for the same price as a plywood back and sides. Why would you go with laminate?
What if you like the sound of a $400 laminate better than that sound of a $400 solid wood guitar?
__________________
Jim
2023 Iris ND-200 maple/adi
2017 Circle Strings 00 bastogne walnut/sinker redwood
2015 Circle Strings Parlor shedua/western red cedar
2009 Bamburg JSB Signature Baritone macassar ebony/carpathian spruce
2004 Taylor XXX-RS indian rosewood/sitka spruce
1988 Martin D-16 mahogany/sitka spruce

along with some electrics, zouks, dulcimers, and banjos.

YouTube
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-28-2018, 06:36 AM
fazool's Avatar
fazool fazool is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 16,622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slooky View Post
I only buy all solid guitars. I would never buy a laminate. Some guitar companies are making all solid for the same price as a plywood back and sides. Why would you go with laminate?
I would rather have an outstanding laminated guitar than a terrible solid body guitar
__________________
Fazool "The wand chooses the wizard, Mr. Potter"

Taylor GC7, GA3-12, SB2-C, SB2-Cp...... Ibanez AVC-11MHx , AC-240
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-28-2018, 06:41 AM
drawshot1975 drawshot1975 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 379
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fazool View Post
I would rather have an outstanding laminated guitar than a terrible solid body guitar
Word....

I've laid hands on many laminate b/s guitars that could toe to toe with solids. If it's built well, the laminated back and sides is nothing more than a note on the specs sheet.
__________________
-Acoustics-
'19 Taylor 322
'20 Taylor 214ce Plus
'20 PRS P20
'19 Yamaha FS830
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-28-2018, 07:06 AM
slooky slooky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Niagara Ontario Canada
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jim1960 View Post
What if you like the sound of a $400 laminate better than that sound of a $400 solid wood guitar?
Then i would buy neither
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-28-2018, 07:07 AM
slooky slooky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Niagara Ontario Canada
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fazool View Post
I would rather have an outstanding laminated guitar than a terrible solid body guitar
If its terrible why buy it?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-28-2018, 07:09 AM
cuthbert cuthbert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 364
Default

Laminated can be high quality or low quality, in the first case it is done because for instance for using beautiful wood in a instrument with a decent price.

IMO there is not much difference in the sound of the guitar in this case, I had a Yairi YW800 that was as good as my Martin but when I had to sell the the shop said they could not offer me much as it wasn't made of "real" wood. Thus we had an argument on the matter, but this is the perception of a lot of guitarists today.
__________________
'04 Ovation Custom Legend 6759 (12 strings)
'06 Ovation Balladeer K1111
'10 Gibson Sheryl Crow
'11 Martin HD-28V
'16 Yamaha FG180 50th anniversary
'18 Gibson Southern Jumbo
'20 Guild F-512 MPL
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-28-2018, 07:17 AM
mercy mercy is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Inland Empire, So California
Posts: 6,246
Default

In genreal if you play plugged I think a lam is better but it you play acoustically then solid is better.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-28-2018, 07:27 AM
lkingston lkingston is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Asheville North Carolina
Posts: 3,247
Default laminated v solid back and sides

I like solid tops, but don’t mind laminated (or HPL, or Ovation style plastic) back and sides. I practice mostly with a solid wood because acoustically I do hear a difference. For gigging with a pickup and a PA, that subtle difference is gone and I’d rather have a little more ruggedness.

I practice with an all solid Martin D15M but gig with an HPL back and sides Martin DX-1. Both of them have Schertler AG-6/S-Mic pickups and while the D15M sounds a little nicer acoustically, they sound almost exactly the same amplified. Both instruments have nice setups.

Last edited by lkingston; 10-28-2018 at 07:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-28-2018, 07:47 AM
stringjunky stringjunky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tegwen View Post
What are peoples thoughts on laminated versus solid back and sides
If it sounds good it is good... that's all that matters to me.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-28-2018, 07:59 AM
YamaYairi YamaYairi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,625
Default

Yairi developed special methods for making laminate woods for guitar that are as good as solid wood. As I recall they claimed it's actually better because the results are more predictable. Since that time the quality of guitars with solid top and laminate back and sides has vastly improved. I have a Blueridge BG60 that is a copy of a 1940's Gibson J45. It's a darn fine copy and it sounds as good as the best J45 I've played, even though the back and sides are laminate.
__________________
Warren

My website:
http://draudio56.wix.com/warren-bendler

"It's hard...calming the Beatle inside of me."
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=