#1
|
|||
|
|||
Taylor Expression System 2 vs Cole Clark 3-way amplification
Hi everyone,
I'm currently in the market for a new acoustic guitar and I'm torn between two options: a Taylor with the Expression System 2 and a Cole Clark with the 3-way amplification system. I plan to use the guitar primarily for live performances, but I also want to have a great acoustic sound (without amplification). I've played both guitars in person and I must say that the Taylor sounds fantastic acoustically, but I feel like the Cole Clark really shines when it's amplified. However, I'm not sure if the difference in amplification quality is significant enough to justify choosing the Cole Clark over the Taylor. I was wondering if anyone else has had a similar experience with these two guitars in a live setting and could offer some insight on how they perform. Is the difference in amplification quality noticeable to an audience, or is it more of a subtle difference? And is the Taylor still a better choice for its superior acoustic sound, even if the amplification is not quite as good as the Cole Clark's? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What are you going to use the guitar for most of the time?
If I were buying a guitar to gig with only, it would be a Cole Clark. The consensus is in a live scenario and amplified, they are hard to beat. If I were buying and owning only one guitar for multiple uses, and those were my choices, it would be the Taylor. Taylor’s are good when amplified.
__________________
Nothing bothers me unless I let it. Martin D18 Gibson J45 Gibson J15 Fender Copperburst Telecaster Squier CV 50 Stratocaster Squier CV 50 Telecaster |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I'm no expert, but it seems to me that if you want to change the amplified sound, there's lots of things you can do (get a Tonedexter, play with EQ, etc.)
If you want to change the acoustic sound, you (roughly) need another guitar. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
If having a fantastic unplugged tone is a priority then I would be looking at the guitar first and the pickup second. I personally would probably go Taylor and ES2. It's not the absolute best pickup out there but it sounds nice and full, it's pretty plug and play and you will have a great acoustic for unplugged playing.
It does also depend on how much you are spending. If you get a cheaper Taylor then the acoustic/unplugged tone won't matter as much. I would only get a Taylor in the 300 and up range. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The Cole Clark is much better plugged in IMO.
I have a guitar for stage and one fully acoustic now. Best to keep them separate.
__________________
Please SUBSCRIBE to my YouTube channel |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Taylor 714ce and CC angel 2
Thanks everyone for your suggestions and insights.
Just to clarify, the specific models I'm considering are the Taylor 714ce and the Cole Clark Angel 2. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
It also depends on the woods that the CC is made from…
__________________
Please SUBSCRIBE to my YouTube channel |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I'd go for the Taylor 714ce as it's likely a better-sounding acoustic and the ES2, when dialed in, sounds really good.
My only Cole Clark was a 2008 Fat Lady 2A, with the Face Brace/Takmine-like UST assembly, dual-source system. It sounded OK amplified but was a bust acoustically.
__________________
Martin HD-28 Sunburst/Trance M-VT Phantom Martin D-18/UltraTonic Adamas I 2087GT-8 Ovation Custom Legend LX Guild F-212XL STD Huss & Dalton TD-R Taylor 717e Taylor 618e Taylor 614ce Larrivee D-50M/HiFi Larrivee D-40R Blue Grass Special/HiFi Larrivee D-40R Sunburst Larrivee C-03R TE/Trance M-VT Phantom RainSong BI-DR1000N2 Emerald X20 Yamaha FGX5 Republic Duolian/Schatten NR-2 Last edited by SpruceTop; 03-27-2023 at 03:14 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I've got a 324ce and a FL1E-BM. I much prefer to play the Cole Clark plugged in.
The Cole isn't bad unplugged. The Taylor is better unplugged. I'd go for the Cole Clark. Even with the LR Baggs Voiceprint DI, the Taylor es2 is lacking plugged in compared to many other guitars I own.
__________________
As my username suggests, huge fan of Yamaha products. Own many acoustic-electric models from 2009-present and a couple electric. Lots of PA too. Last edited by YamahaGuy; 03-26-2023 at 08:30 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I would always choose based on acoustic tone. It is a true product of the laws of physics. Amplified tone starts with acoustic tone and is modifiable at multiple steps along the entire signal chain. Especially with the tools available today. JMO, of course.
__________________
Dave F ************* Martins Guilds Gibsons A few others 2020 macbook pro i5 8GB Scarlett 18i20 Reaper 7 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Aaron, what is your preference?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
All Blackwood as it amplifies well and is sturdy but then people will say the guitar is not resonant. That’s why I think it’s worth having a guitar for stage use.
__________________
Please SUBSCRIBE to my YouTube channel |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I have found that sound resonant acoustic guitars don’t amplify as well as less resonant guitars. A lot of it depends on the type of show and the venue as well.
__________________
Please SUBSCRIBE to my YouTube channel |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I only played two Cole Clarks, one FL3, one FL2 and one AN(2?). The FL2 was very good acoustically, The FL3 nice, the AN was just ok. Amplified I think, they are the best you can get.
Aside of that, I agree completely with Aaron, especially a less resonating top helps a lot on loud stages.
__________________
Martin D-18MD, Martin OM-21, Martin CEO-7, Martin J-40, Martin 000-1, Guild D-55, Guild D-140, Gibson SJ-200, Gibson Hummingbird, Gibson Frank Hannon Love Dove, Gibson Southern Jumbo, Furch Gc-SR Red Deluxe, Furch Yellow Masters Choice, Larrivee P-03ww, Kawaii piano, mandolines, drumsets, doublebass, Fender Jazzbass, ... |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
I've owned or played all the guitars mentioned. For amplification the Cole Clark wins hands down. The Taylor will, generally speaking, sound better acoustically. The Angel is the best of the Cole Clark models acoustically due to its lighter build and larger soundhole. The Taylor can sound decent amplified although I always find their signal output to be very low. The Cole Clark proprietary 3-way pickup is the best I've ever played.
I much prefer the Cole Clark all-blackwood models myself. Make sure you buy used. Cole Clarks just don't hold their value so you can buy them for way less than you will spend buying new so if you buy new you'll take a beating when you sell. Also, the Cole Clark's have a satin finish which some don't like. I actually prefer a satin finish. Conversely, the Taylor has a gloss finish and definitely looks prettier. It will also hold its value better when selling. If you can find one to test, I'd try to play the Cole Clark Angel first. They don't sound bad, just different then most people are used to. But for amplification, they just can't be beat. Maton or Takamine are other great guitars with outstanding pickup systems for great amplification but have a more traditional (and therefore 'better') acoustic tone. They are worthy considerations.
__________________
Call me Scott Cole Clark Angel 2 Thin Line | Emerald X7 Custom Woody | IRIS DF in sinker mahogany Methos1979: (Almost) Every guitar-related review I've written on AGF! Scott & Donna Music Last edited by Methos1979; 03-28-2023 at 02:09 PM. |
|
Tags |
3-way, angel 2, cole clark, expression system 2, taylor 814ce |
|