The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Archtops

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-23-2018, 10:51 AM
Silly Moustache Silly Moustache is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK/EU
Posts: 13,537
Default Comparing three archtops.

... and partly because I've recently got myself another Eastman which I love.

A pressed top Harmony Monterey, a '34 Gibson L-4 and my 2007 Eastman AR805.

I'd be really inters ted in reading any comments corrections (on the guitars and the history rather than my inadequate playing that is).

Thanks,

__________________
Silly Moustache,
Elderly singer, guitarist, dobrolist and mandolinist.

https://www.youtube.com/user/SillyMoustache/videos
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-24-2018, 09:15 AM
Richard Mott Richard Mott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 200
Default

Thanks for this great comparison of three unique archtops. The L-5 has such a great history to it, but I have to say the Eastman really shows the most warmth and depth. There’s almost nothing you couldn’t do on that guitar!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-24-2018, 09:39 AM
terryj47 terryj47 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Mott View Post
Thanks for this great comparison of three unique archtops. The L-5 has such a great history to it, but I have to say the Eastman really shows the most warmth and depth. There’s almost nothing you couldn’t do on that guitar!
Silly,
I agree with Richard. The Eastman is awesome! Not that the others are bad. Thanks for the video. Very enjoyable as are your posts.
Terry
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-24-2018, 01:37 PM
iim7V7IM7's Avatar
iim7V7IM7 iim7V7IM7 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: An Exit Off the Turnpike in New Jersey
Posts: 3,544
Default

Thanks for sharing your guitars and stories...:-)

Archtops, like flat tops represent a fairly broad spectrum of instruments producing a diverse set of timbres. They excel at different things than flat tops do. Most posess superb string-to-string balance, some have the ability to cut and project and some maintain their tonal character in the upper registers.

They are typically, 16”, 17” or 18” (some will differ), either parallel braced or x-braced, f-holed or oval holed, use differing spruces, top carve and recurve release, differing maples (or other woods like mahogany as well), metal or wooden tailpieces and bridges all combine to produce a spectrum of results.

Acoustically, I like to play them with either 80/20 or Monel strings.

I don’t talk much about my archtops on this site because it is so flat top focused. I have two and enjoy them very much. In fact, I actually have 2 flat top instruments with carved backs which makes them operate a bit differently than an arched, ladder braced flat top.
__________________
ACOUSTIC FLAT TOPS by: Michael Bashkin | Mark Blanchard | Laurent Brondel | John Buscarino | Kent Chasson | Howard Klepper | Bruce Sexauer
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-02-2018, 07:46 AM
jdmulli jdmulli is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 423
Default

Great video! Thanks for sharing the various tones of your lovely instruments.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-04-2018, 07:48 PM
Glennwillow Glennwillow is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Coastal Washington State
Posts: 31,942
Default

Very enjoyable video, Andy! It's great to see you enjoying your guitars and fun to hear your voice again! I hope you are doing well!

- Glenn
__________________
My You Tube Channel
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-05-2018, 09:49 AM
Silly Moustache Silly Moustache is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK/EU
Posts: 13,537
Default

Hi Glenn, and everyone else who responded.

Thanks for the kind thought and the comments about these guitars.

Yes they are a different "animal" to our beloved flat-tops but they have still earned their place in te history of the acoustic guitar, and yes, like flat tops they kept getting bigger and bigger ti follow the perceived need for ever more volume.

Apart from the wonderful L-3 that I had in the '70s which had to go to pay the mortgage paynent, (and I still miss) I think that the 1" bodies are the optimum size for the sound.

Anyway, if you have been, thanks for watching the video.
__________________
Silly Moustache,
Elderly singer, guitarist, dobrolist and mandolinist.

https://www.youtube.com/user/SillyMoustache/videos
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Archtops

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=