The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Archtops

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-22-2019, 11:59 AM
29er 29er is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 201
Default Round/Oval Hole Archtop Tone

In general, can someone describe what tonal difference one might expect between an F hole versus a round or oval hole archtop? I have been thinking of adding an archtop to my collection of flat tops and I have not had the chance to try out anything other than the typical F hole guitar.

I am primarily a fingerstyle blues player and I just want a different tone and feel from my usual guitars. I also know that finding round/oval hole archtops is not an easy task! I see used Eastmans from time to time but these things are rare birds. Any thoughts or advise on what I might expect?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-22-2019, 12:15 PM
Bluemonk Bluemonk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 837
Default

I haven't had much experience with round hole archtops. My information is second hand. My understanding is that a round hole archtop will tend, at least slightly, toward sounding like a flattop, with a more diffused projection as opposed to the more focused forward projection of an f hole archtop.

I do have an Andersen archtop with a round hole in the upper bout of the bass side, and it seems to be a different animal altogether, with a little bit of Manouche (gypsy) guitar sound blended in.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-22-2019, 12:16 PM
mr. beaumont mr. beaumont is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,047
Default

Less different than you'd think.
__________________
Jeff Matz, Jazz Guitar:

http://www.youtube.com/user/jeffreymatz
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-22-2019, 02:03 PM
THart THart is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Near the shores of Minnetonka
Posts: 56
Default

I have an F hole and a round hole archtop. While they are totally different guitars I think the F hole projects more but the round hole is more satisfying for me to enjoy playing. As for the sound, I think either one can be great for playing blues. Maybe the construction makes a bigger difference in the sound. I think my vintage Gibson with ladder bracing(?, is that the right term?) and round hole has a "bluesier" sound than my X braced Weber archtop with F holes. I just don't think it's the shape of the hole that makes the difference.
__________________
000-15sm
Weber Bitterroot archtop
Weber Renegade roundneck resonator
'24 Gibson L-2
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-23-2019, 08:50 AM
1Charlie 1Charlie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 1,171
Default

I just picked up a heavily used (OK, abused...) 1932 Gibson L-4 roundhole.

It sits right in the middle between the tone of an F-hole L-50 and a flattop L-00 from the same time period.

The L-4 is not as mid-rangy as the L-50, and it has much better bass response, and more sustain. Not quite as warm as the L-00, but warmer than the L-50.

The L-50 is loud and punchy. Notes bark and then die off almost immediately. The round hole L-4, OTOH, is smoother, rounder, less punchy, and a better all-rounder.
__________________
Neal

A few nice ones, a few beaters, and a few I should probably sell...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-06-2019, 04:54 AM
Quickstep192 Quickstep192 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,040
Default

I think the Andersen Oval Hole Archtop sounds just wonderful.
Here’s a link.

https://youtu.be/Sdgg2cdn23E
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-06-2019, 09:20 AM
Silly Moustache Silly Moustache is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK/EU
Posts: 15,411
Default

Hi, I'd see a similar differnce (is that a thing?) as the difference between Gibson F4 and F5 mandolins.

The F hole version is all about mid tone percussive projection. That's best for rhythm guitar in a dance band setting or X-5 style style mando in bluegrass.

The round hole is less projecting but a slightly (and it isn't enormously profound) "rounder" fuller sound.

This is a MASSIVE generalisation, but that is what I've perceived. I have three f hole archtops all very different :



but I still missed the '20s L-3 that I had to let go to pay my first mortgage (like this one):

__________________
Silly Moustache,
Elderly singer, guitarist, dobrolist and mandolinist.

https://www.youtube.com/user/SillyMoustache/videos
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-06-2019, 01:50 PM
ozarkmac ozarkmac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 78
Default Andersen

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quickstep192 View Post
I think the Andersen Oval Hole Archtop sounds just wonderful.
Here’s a link.

https://youtu.be/Sdgg2cdn23E
Wow! I really like that sound. Just don't like the price! But, you have to pay for what you want.

If I were a pro, no problem, but as a novice, it's difficult to justify.

Any other under $2,000 round hole archtops out there that are decent?
__________________
"I can sit here quietly and let you think I'm stupid or I can say something and confirm it for you."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-07-2019, 11:47 AM
paddybrumson paddybrumson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 26
Default

Two options from Eastman worth looking into. Both are hard to find though:

Eastman AR 400 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrvzvbqmeqY

Eastman AR 904 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1VkOPNcsx4

I took a chance and picked up an AR 400 without playing it first and agree with the reviewer, sounds way better than a laminate should.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-09-2019, 12:31 PM
Spook Spook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 880
Default

And now for some broad generalizations...

Individual guitar construction will matter quite a lot. In oval hole I have a 16" mahogany, 2 17" (one maple, on mahogany), and an 18" copy of a Monteleone Artist. They are made by Yunzhi and Wu guitars out of China. Solid woods, mostly Benedetto construction. I also have 17" and 18" regular archtops from Yunzhi. The oval hole guitars sound more 'open' and seem have a bit more bass and decay time. They still have the more pronounced attack of an archtop. Not the harmonics of a flat top, but more going on than the mid range punch of the archtops. I would choose an oval hole over a regular archtop for finger style blues but some want the dry midrange sound. Easy to figure that out just by playing a Loar at your local Guitar Center.

A Wu/Yolanda Team oval hole will run probably $1300 currently? Hand carved, solid woods, you get to spec neck width, trim, and other stuff. There is some information out there on the boards on how to order one of these. It's been some years since I got mine and I still have every one I ordered. Wouldn't mind a used Eastman but most likely would just order another Wu if I were looking.
__________________
Spook
Southern Oregon
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-21-2019, 11:41 PM
kbrooks kbrooks is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Inland NW
Posts: 26
Default

Regarding round (oval) hole archtop tone,
here is a 2018 Collings AT 16:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kFOcqi3Si5Q

Probably not affordable or even available,
but definitely inspirational.
__________________

-kb

__________________
2010 Roberts Minstrel
2017 JW Van Tele
1931 Martin C-2
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-26-2019, 08:57 AM
Padma Padma is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 4
Default Oval Hole Archtop

I have had an Eastman AR804CE, a maple and spruce oval hole archtop with a floating pickup, for about fifteen years. Nitrocellulose finish. For years I played it acoustically only; lately I have been playing it amplified through a Roland JC-22. I mostly play with my fingers, no fingerpicks, occasionally with a pick. At the moment I have acoustic phosphor bronze strings on it; I have had flat-wounds, TI Be-Bop, etc. I play mostly traditional blues, but also roots type music and a bit of jazz. The sound is very bright, as I would expect from a maple guitar, but deeper, with a more robust sound. It is a small guitar -- 16" lower bout I think, so not all that loud. It would cut through a mix of acoustic instruments, but not be very loud. It has that typical "tinney" sound of an archtop, but richer, with a bit more bass -- it has good tone and is pleasing. Amplified it is extraordinary, with a rich, open sound that is extremely clear -- perfect note separation. I highly recommend an oval hole archtop over a traditional amplified f-hole, of which I have a couple, if you play the kind of music I do.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-26-2019, 09:18 AM
Teleplucker Teleplucker is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont View Post
Less different than you'd think.
I agree, I used to own an Andersen F hole and an oval hole. They are more similar than different.
__________________
Randall Sprinkle

http://www.youtube.com/user/teleplucker?feature=mhum
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-26-2019, 09:58 AM
DenverSteve's Avatar
DenverSteve DenverSteve is offline
Formerly "PastorSteve"
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 11,352
Default

Just like comparing any two instruments - you can't accurately compare them without having them in front of you. Two different f-hole guitars, even the same model, will sound different. Similarly, two nearly identical round or oval-hole instruments will also sound different. Compound that with different years, strings...... So, broad generalizations won't suffice. As always, find a specific guitar you like and buy that one. I wast thinking after reading some threads here recently that a lot of people seem to spend far too much time conjecturing and speculating on guitar possibilities rather than playing the real guitars they have.
__________________
Peace, Steve
Kinnaird, Martin, Charis, Goodall, Breedlove, Collings, Huss & Dalton, Larrivee, Voyage Air, Taylor ...et al..Tried almost everything.


FOR SALE: Breedlove Frontier Concerto E, all Mahogany
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-27-2019, 01:40 PM
Richard Mott Richard Mott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 220
Default

A lot of what has been said here—i.e., all things being equal, which of course they never are, an oval or round sound hole archtop may tend to sound a little more open, while an f-hole may tend to project a bit better and be little more “compressed”. But those generalizations are typically overwhelmed by other variables like scale length, bracing style (tone bar versus X), small changes in the depth of the box, wood variety, density and stiffness, to say nothing of the carve and the curve. As players we naturally tend to attribute tone to things we can easily see like wood choice and round-hole versus f-hole, but the builder makes lots of other choices we never see. I once talked to the excellent flattop (and archtop) builder Mark Blanchard about the difference in sound of using some particular tonewood, and he said something to the effect “It would tend to make the sound more X, but there are so many other choices I make that are more important.”
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Archtops

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=