#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm just curious, how would one describe, as what you said, a "reasonably good" tone of a freshly made guitar that's first strung up? what is usually "lacking" that will come in after several hours and days? |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
I had never "definitively" experienced this before I got my Waterloo WL-K.
I had the impression that some got better, but would have been hard pressed to swear to it. I got the Waterloo delivered from the factory and in the fist week I liked it, but did not love it. I won it in a magazine drawing and had never played one before (they are not so common here in Germany), so there was no "try-before-you-buy". I probable would have passed on it if I'd played it at a shop... After 3-4 weeks of playing though the sound did change somewhat and it has quickly become one of the guitars that I would be hard pressed to part with. The more it gets played the better it sounds!
__________________
scoTt Various stringed instruments |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
For me part of the fun with new instruments is listening to their tonal changes the more they get played. The guitar that I own that I’ve owned the longest is my 000-42, which I got thirty years ago. It was handbuilt for me by Scott Baxendale, based on the blueprint of a 1935 Martin 000-28 that had come in for repair when Scott was working as a repairman at Grunblatt Guitars in Nashville. It was such a great-sounding guitar that Scott drew up a blueprint so he could build another like it at some point.
Which he did, for me, but as a 000-42 rather than a 000-28. Anyway, I used it in performance a couple of months ago, then took it out of its case and played it a few days ago. The sound had changed! The midrange on it was different than it had been just a couple of months earlier. So it’s subtle, but they do continue to evolve. That 000-42 has always been a superb guitar, but it’s become “drier” in tone, more genuinely pre-war sounding. It’ll be interesting to hear what my 2014 Martin D-18 and my 2001 Gibson Advanced Jumbo will sound like in thirty years....chances are that I won’t be around to play them, or too elderly and infirm if I am, but some lucky souls will be. Wade Hampton Miller |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Kathy delivered my guitar to me a day after she strung it up and as others have mentioned, it sounded great but over the next few days, weeks and months it displayed subtle changes in tone and volume - all good. Part of it probably was the process of the woods getting used to their new configuration and it might also have been the influence of temperature and humidity changes. The guitar was built in southern California which is warmer and a bit dryer than the northern California coastal town I was then living in. This guitar will be 14 years old this Thanksgiving and it doesn't change much now but overall has aged beautifully both tonally and visually. It still sounds best at about 40% humidity - maybe that is because it was built at 38%. It seems like it hits a sweet spot there. Best, Jayne |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I borrowed a Tonerite for a couple weeks, but after I experienced what it can do I bought my own. Best guitar money I ever spent.
__________________
Assuming is not knowing. Knowing is NOT the same as understanding. There is a difference between compassion and wisdom, however compassion cannot supplant wisdom, and wisdom can not occur without understanding. facts don't care about your feelings and FEELINGS ALONE MAKE FOR TERRIBLE, often irreversible DECISIONS |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
I've experienced varying degrees of tone change with the break-in period. I had one guitar ship directly from the factory, and the change was more dramatic early on before it settled into a more normal evolution that I've come to expect.
Last year, I had two guitars that both experienced some strange harmonic changes at 8-9 months. The first time, I thought there was a bracing issue, but then it settled after another week (returning in a diminished form a month later, after a string change). Same thing with another guitar (same builder). Meanwhile, I have a Rosewood/Adi guitar that's had a much slower opening process. It took about 12 months for the top to become more responsive, and another six months for the tone to begin to warm up. Normally, I know whether a guitar is a keeper within 12 months, but this one has been a good exercise in patience, as it continually improves with each month. Interestingly, I also own a nearly identical guitar, which had a much faster break-in period and has a much different sound than its twin (despite only being one month apart in age). This one is warmer with more overtones, while the other one is brighter with more clarity. It's fascinating to me how (essentially) the same guitar can sound so different.
__________________
"It's only castles burning." - Neil Young |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
There are some makers though, who make adi tops thinner, and when that happens, it's very responsive on the get-go. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Col |