#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fender Redondo Saddle.
I didn’t like the stock saddle in my Redondo. It fit loosely in the bridge and would fall out easily when unstrung. I have found a perfect replacement in the Graph tech TUSQ PQ-9272-CO. This saddle fits snugly in the bridge and is thinner top to bottom than the stock, giving better action but still has enough to adjust if you want it lower. I’m going lower at next string change. I thought that all the stuff they say about it improving your sound was just hype. But to my ears I really believe that I hear a difference for the better. I’m going to check out their nuts and bridge pins. They sure seem to be very high quality. This saddle is supposed to fit most Fender acoustics and others too.
__________________
2 Fender Mustangs, Fender K C Jaguar, Carvin CS6, and my Fender Redondo. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Perhaps the new saddle sounds better not necessarily because of the material, but because the fit is tighter, so there is less vibrational energy loss.
In other words, the top is being driven more efficiently.
__________________
1955 Gibson ES-125 1956 Fender Champ lap steel 1964 Guild Starfire III 1984 Rickenbacker 330 1990s Mosrite (Kurokumo) Ventures 2002/2005 Fender Japan '60s Tele [TL-62-66US] 2008 Hallmark 60 Custom 2018 Martin Custom Shop 00-18 slot-head 1963 Fender Bandmaster (blonde blackface) 1965 Ampeg Gemini I 2020 Mojotone tweed Champ kit build |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Any change in sound is probably due to BOTH fit and saddle material; since the bridge saddle transfers the string vibrations to the top, there’s no other part that has as direct an impact on the sound of the guitar as the saddle.
So its material matters very much. Wade Hampton Miller |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I guess I never really thought about it. The fit could have a lot to do with what I’m hearing and the material doesn’t have grain like bone which it had. I agree with you both completely. Thanks.
__________________
2 Fender Mustangs, Fender K C Jaguar, Carvin CS6, and my Fender Redondo. |