#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for all the input, everyone. The Zoom H2 looks promising, but I have a Boss Micro BR already, which is not the same thing, but in the ballpark (?). My first thought in going for a USB Mic was the ease of using computer-based software for editing. The biggest headache about the Micro BR is that recording on it is very akward due to the weird menus and button configurations. I've done some decent recordings on it, but it feels too much like rocket science just to get a final project. Perhaps the Zoom H2 is easier to use?
I feel like a USB Mic like the Yeti straight into Audacity would be a decent beginner's set up to get started. Editing and exporting to mp3 would be easy. Am I headed down the wrong road in taking this approach?
__________________
2022 Martin D-18 Authentic 1937 VTS 2019 Guild F-512E 2016 Martin D-28 Authentic 1937 VTS 2015 Gibson J-45 Vintage 2007 Gibson SJ-200 True Vintage |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
It's the player, not the guitar... But, the guitar helps!!! |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I just did a little more reading on the Zoom H2. That little bugger looks pretty neat. Apparently, it can function as a USB Mic and interact with programs like Audacity in addition to being a stand-alone, on-the-go recorder. I think a new toy just entered the conversation....
__________________
2022 Martin D-18 Authentic 1937 VTS 2019 Guild F-512E 2016 Martin D-28 Authentic 1937 VTS 2015 Gibson J-45 Vintage 2007 Gibson SJ-200 True Vintage |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
My Music - http://seansiegfried.bandcamp.com/album/backwoods My Site - http://seansiegfried.moonfruit.com/ My Guitar Vids - http://www.youtube.com/user/themachinist1000 My very minimal guitar collection - Tanglewood TSM 2 Guild GAD 30 |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
You may like to consider Samson Go-Mic? An inexpensive option
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Personally -- and this is not to disparage the Zoom H2 -- I do not think that a field recorder such as the H2 and a USB microphone are the same thing. If one wants a USB mic, then that is what one should get. Ditto if one wants a field recorder.
For my own purposes, I have a Blue "Spark" hooked up to an audio interface, which is then hooked up to my computer. That microphone thus sits there on my desk all the time, ready for me to push "record" on my computer. I also have an H2, and while it does make a fine recording, it is much more complicated to use -- frankly, I cannot run it without referring to the manual (and then I still have issues sometimes) -- but it does have the distinct advantage of being portable. I am suggesting that folks should probably buy that which is optimized to work the way they are really going to USE such an item. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Fran
__________________
E ho`okani pila kakou ma Kaleponi Slack Key in California - www.kaleponi.com My YouTube clips The Homebrewed Music Blog |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Fran
__________________
E ho`okani pila kakou ma Kaleponi Slack Key in California - www.kaleponi.com My YouTube clips The Homebrewed Music Blog |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Cheaper USB mics and USB-based mic converters typically use 16-bit, 44.1 kHz converters, because those chips are less expensive than 24-bit, 96 kHz chips, but none of that is expressed as data compression in order to move files faster that results in lower quality audio. What I have also found is that the USB mics and A/D converters in USB mics simply don't compete with top shelf mics and top shelf A/D converters. In the analog domain, mic cables can affect the sound; pretty subtly once you get up to good quality cables, but discernably different in some cases. I have heard that with my own ears (and in the presence of others who also heard it.) Maybe you can shine a brighter light on the idea that USB cables compress the audio. Regards, Ty Ford |