The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Build and Repair

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 08-01-2020, 08:42 PM
John Arnold John Arnold is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,091
Default

Quote:
I think I see old lines where ladder braces were?
Correct. LG-0 is ladder braced from the factory.

Quote:
Is/was it common to x-brace OVER a bridge plate? I am a newb by this boards standard, but I've never seen that.
Martin tucked bridgeplates until around 1947. These were just under the X-braces about 1/8", with a rabbet cut in the braces to accomodate the plate. The finger braces and tone bars were tucked in a similar manner. On the guitars I have built using this construction, I would glue the bridgeplate, finger braces and tone bars first, followed by the X-braces. This is opposite from the sequence I normally use. The rabbets in the X-braces were carefully fitted so that there were no gaps. While it secures everything better than butting them together, it does make bridgeplate replacement a chore. It is the main reason that a replaced bridgeplate on an older Martin usually decreases the value. It is a job that has often been poorly done.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Build and Repair






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=