#1
|
|||
|
|||
600$ to "fix" my 1960 Martin 000-18...ouch. Should I do it?
So I brought in my 1960 Martin 000-18 to get the side and back cracks repaired (40 bucks). The repair guy said its a really nice sounding guitar and is worthy of a restoration. He wants to do a neck re-set and fret job.
600$!!! He is a top notch luthier and I trust him completely, and he has done lots of high end guitar restorations. I paid 800$ for the guitar. The thing is, I don't even play acoustic that much. Just a bit of open cord fingerpicking. The guitar does sound really really nice. I am worried if I do the work, it will change the character of the guitar? Should I shell out the cash or keep it as-is?? If I ever decide to sell it, will I get that 600$ back? or is it easier to sell it all original. Its a tough one. Cheers |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Well...does it need it?
As for worrying about originality for resale, you don't pay extra for an old mustang with original oil. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, its needs it very bad. The action is 1/4" out of spec and the first several frets are severely worn.
But it still plays OK with open cords. A neck re-set does not affect its value regarding originality? It will be done with the proper hide glue. I feel at 800$ (Cdn funds) I got a good deal. Not sure if 1500$ is such a good deal. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
$600 is not much to do all that work. That guitar is worth restoring so yes, I would do it if it were mine.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
That guitar depending on the rest of it's condition could be worth anywhere from $3000 to $5000 CDN. I'd get it fixed.
https://reverb.com/ca/price-guide/gu...8-1960-natural |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Reset
No, don't do it. Just send it off to me and I'll suffer with it. :
Really though, for a top shelf Luthier to do a neck reset and full refret that's about right. If the guitar is otherwise in good shape its definitely worth doing.
__________________
1995 Taylor 412 1995 Taylor 612C Custom, Spruce over Flamed Maple 1997 Taylor 710 1968 Aria 6815 12 String, bought new |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Oh yeah, go for it. NO question.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I say go for it. You just might find yourself playing acoustic a lot more once the guitar is more playable due to the reset.
Rob |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The repair guy said it's a really nice sounding guitar. Do you think it is a really nice sounding guitar? That's all that really matters. Can you play it comfortably the way it is? If so, I would leave it alone. For the $800.00 you paid for the guitar, you will probably never loose any money on it. For $1,400.00 invested and with all those repairs it might be harder to sell someday without loosing some money. What kind of cracks did you have repaired for only $40.00? Guitars with repaired cracks are not easy to sell.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Then yes, absolutely! As others have mentioned, that guitar is worth a lot more than what you paid for it and the repairs combined. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
It's worth it if you really appreciate that guitar. If not, you could buy a Yamaha FS800 for $200.00 and be just as happy. They certainly wouldn't be the same guitar but as it it, you could sell the Martin for more than $200.00. It all depends on how you look at things. I know what I would do if it was mine.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Agree. You should at least get your money back. If I were you, I would do it because (1) I own it (2) I love the sound and play-ability (3) It's a 58 year old Martin. If number (2) doesn't work for you, don't do it. Find another buyer at $850.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Even if expertly repaired, it will not cost $3000 Canadian, I think. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Just to add to the chorus, it sure is. They are not making any more 58 year old guitars these days.
|