The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-18-2018, 02:42 PM
Shades of Blue Shades of Blue is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,154
Default Given the choice, are lighter guitars better???

Let's say you can choose between 2 guitars of the same model. Is the lighter guitar generally the better of the two? Would the heavier guitar be the better sounding? Does it matter?

My common sense would say that the lighter the acoustic, the more resonant, but I'm sure there is more to it than that. (No I have no NGD pending, just genuinely curious!!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-18-2018, 02:51 PM
Goodallboy Goodallboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: East TN
Posts: 6,847
Default

I don't think there's a "better" guitar when lighter or heavier are your qualifiers.
I'm not sure asking which guitar is "better", no matter what the criteria, but that's another issue.

I've played great sounding, incredibly resonant guitars that are "heavier" built and the same with "lightly" built guitars.
__________________
McCollum Grand Auditorum Euro Spruce/Brazilian
PRS Hollowbody Spruce
PRS SC58
Giffin Vikta
Gibson Custom Shop ES 335 '59 Historic RI
‘91 Les Paul Standard
‘52 AVRI Tele - Richie Baxt build
Fender American Deluxe Tele
Fender Fat Strat
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-18-2018, 02:55 PM
sid45 sid45 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 149
Default

I agree with your take ,lighter I feel resonates more, also its nicer to hold if its nice and light- even electric models can suffer from being to heavy, sid
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-18-2018, 02:59 PM
Kitchen Guitars's Avatar
Kitchen Guitars Kitchen Guitars is offline
Formerly Yamaha Junkie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South West Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,930
Default

Much is about bracing, what top wood, thickness of top wood and a bunch of other seasonings in the recipe
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:04 PM
vindibona1 vindibona1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Chicago- North Burbs, via Mexico City
Posts: 5,219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shades of Blue View Post
Let's say you can choose between 2 guitars of the same model. Is the lighter guitar generally the better of the two? Would the heavier guitar be the better sounding? Does it matter?

My common sense would say that the lighter the acoustic, the more resonant, but I'm sure there is more to it than that. (No I have no NGD pending, just genuinely curious!!!
I would have to say in general, yes. A lighter guitar will have more resonance. But a lot depends on what aspects of the guitar are lighter. And a lot depends on what sound you expect from the guitar.
__________________
Assuming is not knowing. Knowing is NOT the same as understanding. There is a difference between compassion and wisdom, however compassion cannot supplant wisdom, and wisdom can not occur without understanding. facts don't care about your feelings and FEELINGS ALONE MAKE FOR TERRIBLE, often irreversible DECISIONS
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:04 PM
SuperB23 SuperB23 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 5,143
Default

This is a very interesting question that I've pondered myself a bunch of times.

Over the years after owning over 370 high end acoustic guitars and playing some great prewar Martins and lots and lots of boutique brands, that a lot of the really great sounding instruments, the best that I've played have all been quite light weight. I used to joke with friends that the heavy guitars come with light cases and the light guitars come with heavy cases. You want the light guitars with heavy cases.

There are a few brands that engineer their tone using a bit more wood and weight than others that still manage to make amazing sounding instruments. I think of brands like McPherson as a main and extreme example of this.

Some brands that built ultra light instruments are Santa Cruz and a lot of the solo builders that came out of there like McAlister and others. TJ Thompson, Kim Walker and Wayne Henderson also built quite light weight instruments. These builders seem to capture the vintage sound better than others. The 1937 Martin D-18 I had was crazy light weight and one of the best I've played or owned. For a flat picking cannon this is where its at. Have you played a Santa Cruz Tony Rice Pro wow!!!!!! Light and just a cannon of an instrument!!!

Some are kind of in between like Goodall, Kevin Ryan, Froggy Bottom, Lowden, and a bunch of others. Not heavy but not ultra light. I find for fingerstyle playing its hard to beat these brands. I like larger bodied instruments from these brands with a full bass sound!!

My long winded 2 cents.
__________________
Crazy guitar nut in search of the best sounding guitars built today and yesterday.

High End Guitar Review Videos.
www.youtube.com/user/rockinb23
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:12 PM
Wade Hampton Wade Hampton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chugiak, Alaska
Posts: 31,226
Default

I own a Martin CS21-11 made of Madagascar rosewood with an Adirondack spruce top. That particular limited edition run of guitars was the first of Martin's CS Series guitars, and what they did is weigh all their wood stock and use only the lightest 10% of the sets that they had.

So it's an ultralight guitar for a rosewood dreadnought, and, yes, it's marvelously resonant. It's a far better guitar than I am a guitarist.


Wade Hampton Miller
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:14 PM
ljguitar's Avatar
ljguitar ljguitar is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: wyoming
Posts: 42,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shades of Blue View Post
Let's say you can choose between 2 guitars of the same model. Is the lighter guitar generally the better of the two? Would the heavier guitar be the better sounding? Does it matter?

My common sense would say that the lighter the acoustic, the more resonant, but I'm sure there is more to it than that. (No I have no NGD pending, just genuinely curious!!!
Hi SoB

Lightly-built is not the same thing as Weighs-less. It has to do with bracing, & thickness of the top/sides/back, not pounds and ounces (or grams and kilo-grams).

Between two guitars at any given time, when you play them, you will be able to discern which sounds best, plays best, has the most responsiveness, sustain, projection etc.

It's an easy test to administer…and if you have someone else play them for you while you sit across from them, you can pick up on things like projection and the tone as it sounds to the room.



__________________

Baby #1.1
Baby #1.2
Baby #02
Baby #03
Baby #04
Baby #05

Larry's songs...

…Just because you've argued someone into silence doesn't mean you have convinced them…
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:20 PM
tomiv9 tomiv9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,003
Default

Between two of the exact same models, around the same age, i doubt very much you could tell any weight difference without a pretty accurate scale. I think other factors like top or bracing stiffness, would have a greater affect on sound then the very slight weight difference.
__________________
Tom
2016 Bourgeois OM SS (Addy/Maddy/Hide)
2010 Martin D-28
1968 Yamaha FG-180
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:25 PM
llew llew is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Coastal South Carolina
Posts: 13,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wade Hampton View Post
I own a Martin CS21-11 made of Madagascar rosewood with an Adirondack spruce top. That particular limited edition run of guitars was the first of Martin's CS Series guitars, and what they did is weigh all their wood stock and use only the lightest 10% of the sets that they had.

So it's an ultralight guitar for a rosewood dreadnought, and, yes, it's marvelously resonant. It's a far better guitar than I am a guitarist.


Wade Hampton Miller
I owned one of those too Wade...extremely light and resonant. If it had been forward shifted instead or rearward I'd still have it?!?
__________________
Jim

Dogs Welcome......People Tolerated!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:28 PM
RussL30 RussL30 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MS
Posts: 2,269
Default

I’m not sure how much it really matters. My small body Gibson is lighter than a feather and is extremely resonant and loud for a small body. I have a Gibson dread that weighs a ton and it’s very loud and reasonable as well.

Some of the most reasonant and ringing guitars I’ve ever played are old Westerly Guilds that feel like they weigh two tons.
__________________
Taylor- DN8, GS Mini, XXX- KE
Gibson - Gospel Reissue
Takamine- GB7C
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:33 PM
Wade Hampton Wade Hampton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chugiak, Alaska
Posts: 31,226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by llew View Post
I owned one of those too Wade...extremely light and resonant. If it had been forward shifted instead or rearward I'd still have it?!?
Well, in addition to the CS21-11 I own a Custom Shop D-18 with an Adirondack top that does have the forward-shifted braces, and there's definitely a difference in how the two guitars present. But the main reason that I own the CS21-11 is that it was the favorite guitar of a dear friend of mine who passed away, and his widow wanted me to have it.

It's an extraordinary instrument in every respect, which is why I wanted to get it, but it also serves as a memento and keepsake.


whm
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:33 PM
archerscreek archerscreek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,236
Default

Between two of the same model I would bet on the lighter one sounding better unless the difference in weight was caused by the heavier one having a V neck while the lighter one had a skimpy one. V necked guitars always sound better. Haha
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:45 PM
llew llew is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Coastal South Carolina
Posts: 13,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wade Hampton View Post
Well, in addition to the CS21-11 I own a Custom Shop D-18 with an Adirondack top that does have the forward-shifted braces, and there's definitely a difference in how the two guitars present. But the main reason that I own the CS21-11 is that it was the favorite guitar of a dear friend of mine who passed away, and his widow wanted me to have it.

It's an extraordinary instrument in every respect, which is why I wanted to get it, but it also serves as a memento and keepsake.


whm
Well...that makes it even more special! What a great way to remember a dear friend...I'm sure you think of him every time you play it.
__________________
Jim

Dogs Welcome......People Tolerated!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-18-2018, 04:40 PM
Dirk Hofman's Avatar
Dirk Hofman Dirk Hofman is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NOR * CAL
Posts: 7,554
Default

While I tend to agree with the notion, the generality has too many exceptions to be a rule. My best guitars ever have both been very light and somewhat substantial.

That said, all things actually being equal, light guitars are an absolute joy to pick up and play.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=