#31
|
|||
|
|||
Outside of practicing, playing, learning songs and involving yourself with other players...
...If you have a hunger to go deeper, theory is the way. That's it, plain and simple.
__________________
Nothing bothers me unless I let it. Martin D18 Gibson J45 Gibson J15 Fender Copperburst Telecaster Squier CV 50 Stratocaster Squier CV 50 Telecaster |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
I've also been playing for about two years and the best thing I've done is to start playing with a jam group. I just met with a new group and they are some of the most welcoming people I've ever met.
Learning and playing at home can only take you so far. Playing with others is how this is supposed to be. Timing is the most important thing for us to learn. The best way to learn timing is by playing with others. So find yourself a jam group and they will take you in the direction you need to go. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
I was thinking about this post and my reaction to it, or overreaction. At some level I equate the quest for knowledge as a departure from what I hold dear as the Path to Musical Enlightenment: the raw, daily, grubby, unguided battle to dig up one mushroom at a time, tackle one technical fumble at a time, learn one new thing from a song on youtube at a time, record yourself and hear one new mistake and spend hours trying to iron it out; go back to songs you thought you Had Down and scoff at how how immature your arrangements seem now; push hard against technical walls, day after day, until finally, one day, if only for a moment, one gives a little; spend days, weeks, months chasing that glimmer until you begin to own it. Anguish over the sound of one recording from last year, or last week; rejoice over the sound of another from two years ago. Force yourself to go out and perform and do a horrible job and use that anger and frustration to fuel the fight.
None of that can be given to you by a teacher. There's no lesson plan that can do any of that for you. It's just the painful, suffocating, often-hopeless climb, like a goat picking its way up the side of a mountain, until you finally reach what you thought was the top, only to realize it's a lowly plateau and the top lies in unreachable mists far above, next to a pot of gold. I've watched the greatest pianists alive play the same passage perfectly ten, fifteen times, cursing and waving their fists in their anger at themselves for doing it terribly. Music is one of the most rewarding endeavors we can pursue but, like life, it takes all the strength you can muster to make it go well. And theory is great to learn.
__________________
Emerald X30 Padauk Custom Emerald X20 Koa 1998 Gibson J200 Elite 1972 Martin D-28 McPherson Sable Breedlove Masterclass Taylor PS16ce Macassar |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
For me guitar time has always been fun. If it wasn't I would not play guitar. However recording can be somewhat irritating.
__________________
Derek Coombs Youtube -> Website -> Music -> Tabs Guitars by Mark Blanchard, Albert&Mueller, Paul Woolson, Collings, Composite Acoustics, and Derek Coombs "Reality is that which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Woods hands pick by eye and ear
Made to one with pride and love To be that we hold so dear A voice from heavens above |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
I think a lot of the difference in the answers you've gotten comes down to learning styles. Some of us (me, for sure) learn better if we understand intellectually what we're doing and why. Others don't want to intellectualize it and they just do it, learning songs, from bandmates... etc. We also, I think, have a third group who've been playing for decades and, maybe, as they say, they just played a lot of songs before sensing theory or learning it later, but they had decades to do that or maybe a great ear. Personally, I didn't have decades or a great ear or musical parents or anything, and I doubt I'd have ever just sensed it, because I started at zero and had never sensed it the whole rest of my life hearing music, so... yeah. I've been playing for about three years and learned theory and ear training and history and other stuff at the same time. You say you "should" learn. I don't think there's a "should" to it, it's just a matter of whether it'll be useful to you or not.
So, what's it useful for...? Well, it's the difference, for example, between remembering that you'll need to put a capo on the 5th fret for song X so it sounds like the record when you play the open E-chord shapes you learned - the shapes you learned without knowing why they have those shapes... or, instead... knowing that you could also play song X without a capo using open A-chord shapes and knowing how that's going to be the same key but change the voicing a bit and knowing what that means and why that is, so you have more choices in how you want to make X sound. It's the difference between knowing where to put your fingers to make a certain sound and knowing how many other places you could choose to play that sound. It's knowing you could play in any key with or without a capo on a guitar strung standard or in an alternate tuning or even on a different instrument entirely. Not that you could physically play it instantly because that's technique and practice or some crazy amount of god-given talent, but you'd understand how to instantly, because that's what knowing theory is... It's knowing how the music all fits together, how it makes these patterns of sounds that we find pleasing or interesting. And that's an amazing tool that opens up whole worlds, including the one that lets you talk to a lot of cool musicians. There's a lot of inefficient or awkward teaching of theory in the guitar world, so, if you do want to learn, question the methods you see. People will say you have to memorize all the note names and the circle of 5ths, but this is not the most efficient way. They will also say you should start with piano and learn to read a score... but these are both traditional, classical pedagogical traditions that were originally aimed at creating classical musicians, people whose job was to recreate the score... but, this is not usually what adult learners are doing on guitar, so question that idea, too. In the end, if you decide you just want to know where to put your fingers, and, like many, practice the pentatonic scale a lot until you can do it really fast, and you're happy with that, then that's fine, but if, while moving your fingers really fast, you find you really want to know why you're playing the pentatonic, and why it's the minor one most often, and what do we use the major one for, and what is minor and major, anyway, and why do these "5 patterns" really seem like one pattern moved around, and, by the way, why are these chord shapes similar all over the neck...? Then you want to learn some theory.
__________________
"Militantly left-handed." Lefty Acoustics Martin 00-15M Taylor 320e Baritone Cheap Righty Classical (played upside down ala Elizabeth Cotten) Last edited by SunnyDee; 02-13-2019 at 02:22 PM. |