#1
|
|||
|
|||
How wide can fretboard binding be?
I’m planning a bound fretboard. I was thinking about making the binding a little wider/thicker than the usual .060 to allow room to sand and scrape. I’m wondering though - Is there a point where it can be too wide such that there’s too much unsupported fret hanging over the binding.
I’m guessing there must be a reason that .060 has become standard. Any advice? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I have seen guitars with thicker binding on the order of 0.100". In any case, the fretting needs to be such that the overhanging crown is flush with the surface. For one thing, that will avoid the issue of hooking the first string under the fret.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
To argue to extremes, yes, of course it can be too wide. But at that point I think most would think it's silly looking. I'm working on one now that is .09in thick, no where near too thick.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I did not know that there was a standard thickness for fingerboard binding. But if it is .060, that would be because that’s the standard thickness for nitrocellulose bindings from the supply houses, AFAIK. I bind my guitars with .070, usually, and am a bit casual with fingerboard binding dimensions, being more concerned with overall width, which I control after the bindings are on, somewhat oversize, of course.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|