The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-18-2021, 02:15 PM
wguitar wguitar is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,810
Default I prefer guitars from the late 1990's vs new

Hi folks,

I find that my favorite acoustic guitars are from the late 1990's. Both my '98 Webber Roundbody and '96 Larrivee OM-09 Custom 12-fret have something special about them (to me anyway). New guitars are great, but I just enjoy these older models. My presumptions are that they are fully opened up and their true character has emerged.

What has your experience been ? Why do you think there is a difference between these older and newer guitars ? Were builders doing something different in the late 1990's ? Were materials different ? Other ?

Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-18-2021, 06:14 PM
sdelsolray sdelsolray is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 6,956
Default

The Golden Age of acoustic guitars has been going on for several decades, which includes the 1990's. I've owned many guitars from the '90's used for solo finger style (flesh and nail) and most of them were great - from Webber, Goodall, Lowden, and SCGC among others. I still have a 1999 Tippin OMT that I bought new back then.

I don't think the luthiers were doing anything different then they do now, except making minor adjustments to their builds and, of course, applying the increased knowledge and experience earned from their years of hard work and dedication.

Also, many guitars simply sound better once they get some age on them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-18-2021, 06:50 PM
Jinder Jinder is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 332
Default

I agree. I have a 1995 Dove which is honestly the best example I have ever heard. Same with a 1990 Hummingbird I owned for a while and have regretted selling ever since.

My theory is that now, ‘90s guitars are in the sweet spot age wise when they’re played in and have some years and miles on them, but not so much that they’re starting to develop structural issues. Still totally sound and road-ready, but oh-so-sweet and any brash edges worn away.
__________________
'67 Gibson J45 (K&K)
‘81 Eko Ranger IV (weird factory Electra pickup)
'95 Gibson Dove (MagMic)
‘97 Martin D18GE (Sunrise)
‘01 Takamine EAN46C (Palathetic and CT4B)
'02 Takamine EAN20C (Palathetic and CT4BII)
'15 Gibson SJ200 Standard (Sunrise)
‘19 Vintage Paul Brett Viator VC Classical
‘20 Sigma CF-100 copy (Sunrise)

Capos by G7th, amplification by AER.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-18-2021, 10:01 PM
Wade Hampton Wade Hampton is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chugiak, Alaska
Posts: 31,226
Default

Right. They’ve been around long enough that the wood has cured a bit further, but they’re not so old that they’re getting creaky yet.


whm
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-18-2021, 11:01 PM
Jobe Jobe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,627
Default

I love good older guitars. They are honest. "I am done breaking in and opening up. This is who I am." If you can live with a couple of dings here and there there is treasure to be had. Of course you have to like how she decided to be and enjoy her feel and sound. Some guitars can age gracefully. A gift if you can find it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-20-2021, 09:09 AM
B Chas B Chas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,583
Default

I have a couple from the 90s, great guitars.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=