#61
|
|||
|
|||
I should have said technology as in lack thereof...
|
#62
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
For example... listen to some of the recordings of Blind Willie McTell that were done in '62. I'm hearing the same tone out of that 12 string as I do when listening to his earlier stuff. He favored those inexpensive Stella guitars. Of course now those suckers are going for an arm and a leg.
__________________
Fingerpicking Acoustic Blues/Rag/Folk/Slide Lessons https://www.tobywalkerslessons.com/ |
#63
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Fingerpicking Acoustic Blues/Rag/Folk/Slide Lessons https://www.tobywalkerslessons.com/ |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
More than likely though McTell was playing a Harmony-made Stella #922 12 string on the '62 recordings as he had during the Lomax and 1956 sessions. The Harmonys are different sounding than the jumbo and grand concert Schmidt guitars he played before the War.
__________________
"You start off playing guitars to get girls & end up talking with middle-aged men about your fingernails" - Ed Gerhard |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I need more time to play music. |
#66
|
||||
|
||||
I had a #922 and have played a couple of jumbos from the 30's. You're right. The older ones... to my ears... sounded a little richer then it's later counterpart, although it was tough to tell on those early recordings. Nothing beats comparing them (guitars) side to side though.
__________________
Fingerpicking Acoustic Blues/Rag/Folk/Slide Lessons https://www.tobywalkerslessons.com/ |
#67
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But it gets complicated. Limitations of the earlier recording techniques may have influenced the choice of instruments. Some guitars may have recorded better than others on the earliest types of recording gear. Those guitars then became the iconic sound. Now, that doesn't negate your point at all. If this analysis is correct (which is an open question), then what we hear on the older recordings is a certain sound that those guitars produced then (like in the 1930s), and again later (like in the 1960s) when they were recorded with newer equipment. That is, the basic voice of the instruments is evident in both time periods and is recognizably different from, say, a Martin D-28. But the equipment may have played a significant role in shaping our tastes by being more compatible (back in the early days) with the tone of certain guitars (like small-bodied birch guitars with ladder bracing) than with the tone of others (like X-braced Brazilian rosewood dreadnoughts). Again, this is a supposition that seems to fit the facts but it isn't a proven truth by a long shot.
__________________
Bob DeVellis |
#68
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
On another note Bob... I once asked Jack Owens (late blues musician from MS) why he was playing a Kay rather then the National that he owned. It turned out that someone talked him into trading away his National for the Kay and he's regretted it ever since. The original recordings I had of Jack were done in '63 I believe and that National sounded incredible. His later recordings in which he used the Kay, as technically wonderful as they were exposed that cheaper guitar for what it was... a beat up piece of %$^& that even Jack hated. Here's a picture I took of him in Greenville MS with that instrument: And here's one with him and his National that was taken back in the early 60's
__________________
Fingerpicking Acoustic Blues/Rag/Folk/Slide Lessons https://www.tobywalkerslessons.com/ |