The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Build and Repair

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-22-2020, 06:36 AM
hat hat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,372
Default Classical build - thinner plates?

Are classical guitar backs, ( and sides) typically a bit thinner than steel string builds? what about the top thickness? Does it matter much as to species re thickness? (spruce vs Cedar vs redwood) ?
__________________
______________
---Tom H ---
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-22-2020, 07:59 AM
redir redir is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Posts: 7,676
Default

It all matters yes. Backs and sides are often built to spec but a top should always be built to the material properties of the given piece of wood. There are many ways to determine that from a more scientific acoustic testing to a luthiers experience. Generally sides and backs are a bit thinner especially for Flamenco guitars but there are all sorts of design philosophies too. Thicker stiffer sides for example can make the vibrating surface area of the top extend out more towards the sides and couple the top with the back. A thicker back can make a more reflective guitar, and so on.

Do you have any books for this construction project?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-22-2020, 10:10 AM
Alan Carruth Alan Carruth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,196
Default

When thinking about the top thickness what matters most structurally is it's bending stiffness along the grain. You want it to be just stiff enough to hold up over the long term under the torque of the string pull. Bracing is used to add some stiffness without adding too much mass, but the top thickness is key to getting a good tone, since most of the weight is in the top and you're trying to get the weight down, particularly on a Classical.

The torque on the bridge is a product of the tension of the strings and how high they are off the top. Nylon strings typically pull about half the tension of steel strings, and are normally not quite so high off the top, so the torque is lower. OTOH, the bracing on nylon string guitars is not so stiff, so more of the load is taken by the top.

The actual stiffness of the top varies as the cube of the thickness: making a nylon string top half as thick as the same wood for a steel string would leave it only 1/8 as stiff. To make a top half as stiff, you'd make it about 80% of the original thickness, all else equal. Taking into account the difference in bridge height and bracing, I tend to make tops for nylon string guitars about 85% as thick as I would if I were using the same piece of wood for a steel string.

I could probably go on for the better part of an hour on this, but that should be enough to get you started if you already have some experience making steel strings.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-22-2020, 10:31 AM
hat hat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,372
Default

Thanks both for your input. I am just starting to think about this project. I have done some steel string guitars, but never a classical. I have a few nice sets of native quartersawn Walnut, and want to use that for the back/sides, and Cedar for the top I think. at this point I'm just gathering ideas and thoughts...
__________________
______________
---Tom H ---
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Build and Repair






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=