#1
|
|||
|
|||
1 13/16 nut and 2 3/16" string space playable?
I am about to buy a McIlroy and see in the specs a 1 13/16" nut width (46mm) and 2 3/16" string spacing (56mm). How playable is this for fingerstyle ect. Is it common this width?
__________________
2019 Brook Tamar -Red gum custom shop 2015 Martin D35, 50th anniversary custom shop 2017 Lowden F32 2010 Martin D41 special 2009 Mcilroy A56 Cocobolo 2017 Taylor GS mini Koa |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Sounds just about perfect to me. Just a bit more room than a standard 1 3/4 Neck. Should be a wonderful fingerstyle guitar
__________________
Schenk Grand FingerStyle, Richard Gilewitz signature Emerald X7 Taylor 555 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A few of my older guitars have a 1 13/16" nut which I like. Personally though I find a 2 3/16" string spacing a bit skimpy. I prefer 2 5/16" string spread but have no problem with a 2 4/16." Anything under that though would be really pushing it.
__________________
"You start off playing guitars to get girls & end up talking with middle-aged men about your fingernails" - Ed Gerhard Last edited by zombywoof; 05-24-2018 at 04:26 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I find that spacing very comfortable for fingerstyle. Wider string spacing does seem to help me play a little cleaner I think.
__________________
Englemann/Hog OM (Carson Crickmore course custom build), Breedlove Premier Concert (R/W), 1977 S Yairi YD303, Yamaha LJ16, Fender Tele Standard, Furch Little Jane (Cedar), Baby Taylor BT1 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
That doesn't seem to be that wide of a string spacing. I usually prefer 2 1/4 or 2 5/16 for finger style. Not sure what the purpose of having a wide nut but not pair it with a wider string spacing.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The McIlroy is custom made with these specs, i will get it end next week. The anwsers comfort me ,it is a used guitar
__________________
2019 Brook Tamar -Red gum custom shop 2015 Martin D35, 50th anniversary custom shop 2017 Lowden F32 2010 Martin D41 special 2009 Mcilroy A56 Cocobolo 2017 Taylor GS mini Koa |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It's simple. It's because the strings are getting 'attacked' at different angles by the different jobs required of each hand. I've actually been doing just fine with my custom Telecaster which has a very large profile (deep, fat V) with 1 & 3/4" nut, but still has a 2 & 1/8" saddle spacing, while my Flammang has an even larger profile, 1 & 13/16" nut, but a 2 & 3/8" spacing. Nail length, I suppose, helps to 'aim' the attack at the bridge, but you don't get that sort of help with fat fingertips on the fretting end. HE |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I prefer 2 5/16 as well - makes a huge difference for me. 1 13/16 or wider at the nut is required!
__________________
"One small heart, and a great big soul that's driving" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
And you Flammang example seems to prove my point. Both 1 13/16 and 2 3/8 are wide. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Those numbers seem a bit odd to me. The spacing at the bridge should be at least 2 1/4.''
__________________
Play it Pretty |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Sir, with your waistline being 36" you should definitely have a 32" inseam"......said no clothing salesman, ever.
If you don't understand why nut width and saddle string spacing really don't have a correlation, I'm not sure I can explain it to you, but a clue to follow would be that no two people are built alike, etc. One example would be something like the Martin Paul Simon OM-42PS, which came with a 1 & 11/16" nut and 2 & 1/4" string spacing. Ask Paul why he requested that. Regards, Howard Emerson |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I'd prefer a wider bridge spacing of 2 5/16 with that wide of a neck.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I do have one guitar with 1-13/16" and 2-3/16" that I used for fingerstyle. I mean, you can play any style with any specs, it's just about how optimal or not they are. In this case it works, but I wish it were wider at the saddle. |