The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Classical

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-08-2010, 06:40 AM
Kindness Kindness is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,137
Default Truss Rods in Nylon Stringed Guitars

Ah, the controversy over truss rods. I always love this discussion. But I am an avid fan of them in my classical/nylon stringed guitars. My teacher, who humidifies all of his guitars, has two necks that bowed on him with classical guitars that did not have truss rods. Phoenix Guitar Co. builds all of their nylon stringed guitars with truss rods.

And as George at Phoenix Guitar Co does a lot of repairs, many classicals he sees come in are with bowed necks.

So, which models have truss rods? The ones that I know of are the Takamine classicals, and the Kenny Hill guitars. If you know of others, please post!
__________________
Lisa

Phoenix Guitar Co. Custom Classical Guitar
Rainsong Shorty FLE
Pre Peavey Cargo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2010, 07:20 AM
ewalling ewalling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 20,772
Default

Ovations and La Partries have them. So does my Godin ACS SA slim, but perhaps that doesn't count as it's really an electric guitar. But I agree - I feel a reassurance knowing that there's a truss rod. It also gives me the freedom to experiment with a harder tension and not worry that the neck is going suffer the effects. I know they say that nylon strings don't vary that much in tension, but it's still a consideration, albeit irrational, on my part.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2010, 08:01 AM
Play2PraiseHim Play2PraiseHim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Constantly in His presence & almighty glory!
Posts: 2,769
Default

I am pleased to report that my Cervantes has a trustrod.
__________________
Lady Toni
Gibson Hummingbird True Vintage
CV Precision Basses (2)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2010, 09:24 AM
dosland dosland is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Zealand, South Island, way down toward the bottom!
Posts: 528
Default

I have a Fernandes with a truss rod in it. Surprisingly nice instrument, for the price...
__________________
Yamaha Pacifica 512, Yamaha APX6, Alhambra 7c, Taylor 110 (w/upgraded Taylor gold tuners!), Alhambra 7p, Yamaha CS-40, Samick Corsair Pawn-Shop Special Bass
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2010, 09:28 AM
dwalton dwalton is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,204
Default

If a classical guitar can be made with a lightweight truss rod such that there is no negative impact on tone, then IMO there's no reason to not want one. And there are some pretty good luthiers out there who think this can be done.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2010, 09:55 AM
john bange john bange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 338
Default

From the standpoint of a poor old folk singer who uses nylon on both my guitar and my banjo, I would not consider an instrument without a truss rod.
The smallest adjustment can improve the action on any guitar. Nylon will bend any neck without a rod over time no matter what the tension.

I like a little relief in my neck and have gotten comfortable fine tuning the rod on all my stuff.
A classical artist might not need this adjustability. I think they like the action higher than I do. I don't know...but I love to listen to them play!

I like the action a little on the low side and without any buzz from a good hard thump from my thumb nail. I achieve this with neck relief and bridge saddle height.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2010, 10:33 AM
rgregg48 rgregg48 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky
Posts: 3,777
Default

Classical guitars have a lot of tradition in the build that
is antiquated , in my opinion,,but,,,,????
Most builders have felt that truss rods are not
needed on the lower tension of the nylon string,,
yet they build these baseball bat necks.
I have seen very old high end classicals
with straight necks,, but they used standard
tension strings,,
with todays high tension string and super High tension
i would want a truss rod,, and thinner neck radius
The crossover builders are using truss rods, or at least
ebony or graphite rod.
and who needs the spanish (slipperfoot) heel?
You cant do a neck reset on them (all you can do is a fingerboard planeing)
Classical builders should go to the german dovetail..
at least.

Rickr
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-08-2010, 10:37 AM
MJScott MJScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 356
Default

My Yamaha NTX has a truss rod.
__________________
Thanks, Mike

Guitars:
A few, but on the hunt for the "one"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-08-2010, 12:55 PM
Herb Hunter Herb Hunter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 18,560
Default

Taylor nylon-string guitars not only have truss rods, the also have the unique advantage of the NT neck.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-08-2010, 01:16 PM
ac ac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,787
Default

The Washburn Rover Nylon (RO-20) has a truss rod!! [but maybe not exactly news you were looking for :-)]
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-08-2010, 03:59 PM
Turp's Avatar
Turp Turp is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: likely somewhere I shouldn't
Posts: 3,175
Default

A number of Cordobas have them and truss rod top of the list of features I was considering.

BTW- this is a great topic. I had to do quite a bit of research to find which classical/crossover guitars have truss rods. Many builders don't advertisement fact, almost like it was feature they weren't proud off.
__________________
Taylor 12fret Cedar/Mahogany, Taylor GC8, Carvin AC275,
Carvin CL450, Takamine TC135SC, Yamaha APX5na

Last edited by Turp; 12-08-2010 at 04:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-09-2010, 12:54 AM
gltr gltr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 67
Default

Lowden and Wechter come to mind.

Regarding classical guitar neck building methods and string tensions, I have come to appreciate the chunkier neck on my Candelas guitar in that it allows my to play longer without muscle cramping as I would get on my nylon string jazz guitars. Whether that is the part of the reason for thicker neck profiles I don't know. But I would imagine classical technique is part of the equation. We keep trying to fit classical guitars into our steel string mindset which can cause all kinds of concerns.
One I think is the idea of using higher tension strings which traditionally are reserved both for the performing artist who needs extra volume to be heard acoustically in a large concert hall and for short scale guitars. putting these strings on a standard or long scale guitar may eventually lead to neck issues and can place to much tension on the top as well leading to decrease in sound quality and tone production. it is interesting to note that normal tension strings can lead to an increased treble which might be counter intuitive to a steel string player.
That being said my favorite guitar has a truss rod and occasionally high tension strings.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-09-2010, 08:54 AM
guto guto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: São Paulo, Brazil.
Posts: 134
Default

I guess what most people who are not really classical players don't get is: classical guitars are made for classical players/music needs.
The wide fretboard, thicker neck are not downsides, they are good ones, if you are playing with the proper technique.
A lot of inovations beeing used today on acoustics comes from classical guitars, so they are not THAT atached to tradition. In fact, most of the newer classical guitarrists are playing on "modern guitars". I watched Ana Vidovic playing her Redgate this Tuesday.

Some people use truss rods on classicals, some think they dont need one. If a guitar is well built, in the end, it doesn't really matter.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-09-2010, 09:04 AM
Herb Hunter Herb Hunter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 18,560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guto View Post
I guess what most people who are not really classical players don't get is: classical guitars are made for classical players/music needs.
The wide fretboard, thicker neck are not downsides, they are good ones, if you are playing with the proper technique.
A lot of inovations beeing used today on acoustics comes from classical guitars, so they are not THAT atached to tradition. In fact, most of the newer classical guitarrists are playing on "modern guitars". I watched Ana Vidovic playing her Redgate this Tuesday.

Some people use truss rods on classicals, some think they dont need one. If a guitar is well built, in the end, it doesn't really matter.
I quite disagree. As far as I'm concerned. there is no benefit to a flat fretboard; a two-inch nut width is of no advantage to someone with slim fingers regardless of technique; the thickness of the neck is simply a matter of personal preference.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-09-2010, 09:07 AM
Tommy Tommy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 87
Default

I'm with Guto all the way!
T/
__________________
Goodness had nothing to do with it.
Mae West
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Classical






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=