#31
|
|||
|
|||
So odd, I find mahogany is a little more soft and muddy, musty doesn’t seem like the right word, but I find rosewood way more clear which is one of the reasons I’m longing for a mahogany to own!
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
I go by how the guitar sounds, not what it's made of, but I'm seemingly in the minority so you'll get plenty of opinions on guitars no one has played, so it should be easy to decide.
__________________
McCollum Grand Auditorum Euro Spruce/Brazilian PRS Hollowbody Spruce PRS SC58 Giffin Vikta Gibson Custom Shop ES 335 '59 Historic RI ‘91 Les Paul Standard ‘52 AVRI Tele - Richie Baxt build Fender American Deluxe Tele Fender Fat Strat |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
On larger body guitars like dreadnoughts and 12 fret Triple O’s, I prefer mahogany or koa for the back and sides woods, because they tend to have better clarity and a more vivid treble response. Rosewood, especially Indian rosewood, adds some bass response, and when you’ve got a body cavity the size of what you have in a dreadnought, it’s easy to get bass-heavy and partially drown out the other registers.
Having backs and sides made of mahogany or koa counters that to a noticeable degree. But that same additional bass response from rosewood that I’m not fond of in dreadnoughts is exactly why I like it in 14 fret Triple O’s, OM’s and smaller instruments - rosewood adds fullness and additional bass to the sound, and makes these smaller guitars sound considerably bigger than they actually are. Hope that makes sense. Wade Hampton Miller |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Most people will say they prefer mahogany due to those guitars being in the majority, as a result of their affordability vs rosewood.
I like both, but currently have a preference towards rw. I have never tried either with an adi top unfortunately.
__________________
"All I can be is me.....whoever that is" Bob Dylan 1934 Gibson Kalamazoo KG11 www.reverbnation.com/jamesascott |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
I am in the rosewood and mahogany camp. I own and love guitars made with both woods. I don't long for one while I am playing the other but it is true that each of my guitars have their individual tone and at times I do prefer playing certain songs on one guitar over the other because of the tonal options that it offers.
Best, Jayne |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
My vote is for mahogany being the best Tone wood for all around Generic playing given that I could only own one guitar. Good strummer and fine for fingerstyle also. If a person likes to play slide mahogany excels.
Blues. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Rosewood
__________________
Martin D-35 Martin 000-18 |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
scott |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
As of right now, I'm a mahogany guy! With all this talk of walnut, and not having every played one, I'm gonna start searching a walnut guitar out.
The rosewood guitars I've owned were too shimmery and layered for how I play...which is poorly. scott |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
I agree with you, mahogany sounds warmer, woodier, more focused and balanced than rosewood. I really dislike rosewood's tiny metallic highs and lacking mids
__________________
Furch OM 32 SM Cordoba Maple Fusion 14 Esp Horizon NT Jackson US Soloist Youtube - Reverbnation - Twitter - Facebook |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
While you’re trying them out, see if you can find a Breedlove with myrtlewood back and sides. Very interesting American wood with great bass and crystal clear highs. Mine has Port Orford Cedar on top, but you can also find spruce, redwood and myrtlewood tops.
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Jayne wrote:
Quote:
whm |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
For me, it comes down to the individual guitar. I have played mahogany guitars that have some of the ‘stereotypical’ rosewood qualities and, vice versa.
If I am choosing one based on woods alone, I would probably choose mahogany...at least right now...as I type this reply. :-)
__________________
Hope. Love. Music. Collings|Bourgeois |