|
|
#16
06-11-2018, 02:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
My Audix usage is:
Om-2 - flutes and whistles (wedges) Om-3xb - male vocals with a "strained" raspy (pop/rock) voice that needs some warmth and solidity in the midst but clear and controlled top (IEM) Om-7 - male vocals with more open, chesty (folk/country) voice. Lots of rich low notes (wedges). Also, chesty female blues and solo Irish trad. Om-5 - misc unexpected, great at most things but not as well suited to these individuals.
__________________
Give a man a fishing rod... and he's got the makings of a rudimentary banjo. 
|
|
#17
06-11-2018, 09:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
....have had an OM5 for years.....works great, fits my voice, and as stated....great feedback resistance....
__________________
--'87 Ovation TB-01 Thunderbolt --'15 Yamaha LL-16-12-string A.R.E --Fishman SA-220 PA --TC Helicon Voice Live Play GTX --Audix OM5 Dynamic mic --Shubb C1 Capo --Various other "stuff"
|
|
#19
06-12-2018, 09:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
As it turns out, I'll be playing the showcase where OM5s are employed tomorrow night. My choice will be to drop the low notes or be that "special" person who brings his/her own mic. I've endured that scenario from both sides of the fence. Looks like I'll be going "bottomless" tomorrow night
 PS I got to the event and a sub host was there with his SM58s. Its a fairly quiet setting so the SM58 were quite adequate with respect to feedback rejection. They also handled the low notes well (as evidenced by my video). The SM58 is a cardioid pattern mic which has more proximity effect than the OM5, so that no doubt helped. Last edited by guitaniac; 06-14-2018 at 07:15 AM.
|
