#76
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Most (all?) new housing developments are done that way, IIRC. Yeah, I get exactly what you're saying, so we'll leave it at that.
__________________
(insert famous quote here) |
#77
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
As for birds, most species are not programmed to look for threats coming from above in the Z-axis. The really fast moving vertical tips (they only look like they are moving slowly to us from a distance) will take out a bunch of them - and many are endangered or threatened species like raptors. Having been around the power industry for 35+ years, it is noteworthy that we have never been invited to tour a wind farm. We have toured substations and many power plants (coal, nuclear, hydrothermal, solar, etc) but never a wind farm. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#80
|
||||
|
||||
As an aside, outdoor cats kill 2.4 BILLION birds a year in the US alone.
https://abcbirds.org/article/outdoor...ays-new-study/ Even though windmill strikes are a rounding error on that number, my feeling is that it isn't to be ignored. We're talking about different and potentially endangered bird types in some cases, and the damage can be mitigated with placement of the windmills. But let's do keep it in perspective. I presume no one thinks we should abandon cat ownership because of the above. |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Journey OF660, Adamas 1581, 1587, 1881, SMT - PRS Cu22, Ibanez JEM-FP, S540, RG550, Fender Stratocaster Heil PR-35 : Audio Technica AE-6100, ATM5R : Beyer TG-V90r : Sennheiser 441, 609, 845, 906 : ElectroVoice ND767 HK 608i Friedman WW Smallbox, Marshall 4212 |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Sorry...had to go there. I find that statement absurd. That’s certainly because I’m old, unenlightened and out of it.
__________________
Nothing bothers me unless I let it. Martin D18 Gibson J45 Gibson J15 Fender Copperburst Telecaster Squier CV 50 Stratocaster Squier CV 50 Telecaster |
#83
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The "manufacturing windmills pollutes" argument is similar to the "windmills kill birds" argument. In seeking to illuminate the downsides of clean(er) energy, they both intentionally obfuscate the far greater harm other forms of energy generation create. They become false equivalencies and strawmen. We all know manufacturing has an environmental cost, no one is arguing that it's free of cost. And like our buddy Putin in the link above, these arguments are generally made out a concern for personal advantage, ideology, or defense of the status quo rather than an abiding concern for our avian friends or the aesthetics of energy generation. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
I think this thread has run its course. Closed.
|