#1
|
|||
|
|||
J50 vs Natural J45
Always curious since there is not too much information out there.
I have a Gibson branded J45 natural (blonde) that is early 90s. Most folks I talk to say it is a J50 but the label clearly states J45. Was that a production run issue in the 90s with non-burst J45s. Is there a great difference? I don't think they do any more. Thanks for any info. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
For some reason, Gibson decided to “go rogue” with their naming system and do away with the J-50 designation in favor of calling it a natural J-45 a couple times, including the 90’s. They stuck with this on and off through the years as it suited them, it seems. As always, though, a natural J-45 IS a J-50, and vice-versa. No structural differences between the two at all, just finish (or lack thereof).
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Thanks |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Uriah,
You got the answer from rc3797, but I feel tempted at add that I’ve seen J 50s and J 45Ns both offered in the same years. Gibson followers (such as me) refer to this as “Gibson being Gibson.” Even when I was a tadpole my buddies and I often scratched our heads over why Gibson model specs seemed so haphazard. Oh, it’s friday, let’s put on this funny pickguard I just found in the scrap box. Or, I wonder which bridge fits—or which side of it is up or down. Let’s call this guitar an LG 2 reissue even though it’s clearly an LG 3. I play a mid 90s J 50. Structurally, it’s a J 45 with a natural top and a big, batwing pickguard. I think all the J 45Ns I’ve seen have tear drop guards?
__________________
Peace, Jimmy Optima dies, prima fugit For Sale: Larrivee P 01Khttps://www.acousticguitarforum.com/...49#post7433849 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Then again, before 1955(?) J-50s had a teardrop pick guard anyway.
__________________
Charlie ------------------------------------------------- 2009 '69 Thinline Telecaster 2006 Gibson AJ 2001 Gibson J-50 1970's Baldwin/Ode banjo 1940 Harmony Patrician 1940 Harmony resonator 1930's Kalamazoo KG-11 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Uriah, it’s actually quite simple: playing a J-50 makes you completely irresistible to members of the opposite sex.
Playing a J-45 Natural makes them shrug and say: “Okay, so that’s yet another person with an acoustic guitar.” Hope that clears up the confusion for you... Wade Hampton Miller |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
ya |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
My 2009 Mr Natural.
Last edited by Bluejeannot; 03-20-2023 at 07:17 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
J-45 is more marketable than the J-50. The J-45 has lots of history attached to the model name. J-50 has no real marketable history.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
There are a very distinguished list of users though.Dylan,James Taylor,Tom Rush,John Renbourn, Lightning Hopkins, Wizz Jones etc.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
James Taylor burst onto the scene with his J50. You can hear it plainly on early recordings.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, but Dylan played so many different guitars over the years that he was not really associated with that particular model.
Last edited by Black Squirrel; 03-20-2023 at 07:49 PM. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
J45 vs J50
Wow, this debate never seems to go away, does it?
They are different guitars. I had a ‘65 J45 Nat Adj. it was a J45 with a natural top and that tone killing adjustable mechanism with a ceramic bridge. Best thing I ever did was to remove the adjustable hardware and make a hardwood insert to fill the slot and install a standard bone saddle. But, again, they are different models.
__________________
1995 Taylor 412 1995 Taylor 612C Custom, Spruce over Flamed Maple 1997 Taylor 710 1968 Aria 6815 12 String, bought new |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Exactly! Now we are making sense! I better put a pic of my Gibson J50 up: BluesKing777. |