The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-18-2019, 10:43 AM
ii Cybershot ii ii Cybershot ii is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,216
Default Comfort of Taylor dread vs Gibson slope shoulder

I find that I rarely reach for my dreadnought Taylor guitars anymore because it's just easier to play my smaller bodied guitars.

However the allure of a Gibson J45 is strong...!

If I find Taylor dreadnoughts slightly uncomfortable, will I find the Gibson J45 uncomfortable as well?

P.S. I have played lots of J45 guitars on plenty of occasions, but you never really know until you own a guitar if it's right for you, so I am curious what the forum thinks?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-18-2019, 10:57 AM
C_Becker C_Becker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 164
Default

No experience with the Taylor, but a slope-shoulder feels slightly more comfortable to me compared to a "standard" square-shoulder dreadnought.
Dunno why.
__________________
Gibson Advanced Jumbo Red Spruce
Epiphone IB 64 Texan

And about a dozen electrics

New/Old Gibby owners here UNITE! Let's see em!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-18-2019, 11:40 AM
Paddy1951 Paddy1951 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C_Becker View Post
No experience with the Taylor, but a slope-shoulder feels slightly more comfortable to me compared to a "standard" square-shoulder dreadnought.

Dunno why.
I agree with this. The slope-shoulder shape coupled with a short scale, makes for an easier playing, more comfortable guitar than a square shouldered long scale guitar.

Compared to a smaller body... Probably not as comfortable for most people.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-18-2019, 01:18 PM
rokdog49 rokdog49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 13,543
Default

I don't know about other comparisons but...
I find my J45 more comfortable to play than my D18.
__________________
Nothing bothers me unless I let it.

Martin D18
Gibson J45
Gibson J15
Fender Copperburst Telecaster
Squier CV 50 Stratocaster
Squier CV 50 Telecaster

Last edited by rokdog49; 03-18-2019 at 02:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-18-2019, 01:19 PM
maxtheaxe maxtheaxe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: N. Oregon Coast
Posts: 1,368
Default

The combination of a slope-shoulder design and Gibson's typically shorter scale make for a very comfy guitar to play...far more so IMHO than a traditional type dread, usually with a 25.5" scale, from any builder including Taylor.
__________________
Larrivee L-10 Custom
Larrivee DV-10K
Larrivee L-03
Taylor 412K ('96)
Yamaha LL16-12 (SOLD)
PRS 'Studio' (SOLD)
Rickenbacker 660-12 (SOLD)
Fender USA Deluxe Strat
Fender USA Roadhouse Strat
Fender MIM/USA Partscaster
Fender MIM Nashville Tele
Kelsey Custom Hardtail Strat
Fender MIM P-Bass
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-18-2019, 01:30 PM
drplayer's Avatar
drplayer drplayer is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C_Becker View Post
No experience with the Taylor, but a slope-shoulder feels slightly more comfortable to me compared to a "standard" square-shoulder dreadnought.
This is the same for me, and it's likely because of the body depth. A D-18 for example is 4-7/8" deep at the lower bout, while a J-45 is 4-1/2" deep. The J-45 is also short scale, which may contribute to a sense of greater comfort as well.
__________________

Martin 000-28EC
'71 Harmony Buck Owens American
Epiphone Inspired by Gibson J-45
Gold Tone PBR-D Paul Beard Signature Model resonator

"Lean your body forward slightly to support the guitar against your chest, for the poetry of the music should resound in your heart."
-Andrés Segovia
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-18-2019, 02:29 PM
ii Cybershot ii ii Cybershot ii is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drplayer View Post
This is the same for me, and it's likely because of the body depth. A D-18 for example is 4-7/8" deep at the lower bout, while a J-45 is 4-1/2" deep. The J-45 is also short scale, which may contribute to a sense of greater comfort as well.
Are you sure about this depth? I tried researching this and found a higher number.

Either way the responses in this thread aren't going to do my bank account any favors!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-18-2019, 02:41 PM
Gomers Gomers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 383
Default

In my experience, the J45 has a very slightly more pinched waist than a typical dread making it sit lower on the lap. Not sure how that would translate with a Taylor whose overall shape is slightly different to the traditional Martin dread shape, to my eyes, Taylor's seem a touch more rectangular, don't think they're quite as deep though.
__________________
2008 Martin 000-15
2004 Yamaha LL-500
1995 Yamaha LA-8
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-18-2019, 03:01 PM
EverettWilliams EverettWilliams is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 755
Default

I think the difference is really modest. Go play one, but when I pick up a slope D after playing a square shouldered D, I never think “man, this guitar is more comfortable.” (Not that I find either uncomfortable.)

Where I notice a difference is a small jumbo (pinched waist) or OM (and then on from there).

I highly recommend trying it out in person, but the difference strikes me as more of a rounding error than a material difference.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-18-2019, 03:14 PM
zmf zmf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 7,681
Default

I can't promise you my Santa Cruz VS has the same dimensions as the J-45 because I can't find them, but the VS feels more comfortable and "smaller" than a typical dreadnaught.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-18-2019, 09:35 PM
kcnbys kcnbys is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Slinger, WI
Posts: 2,055
Default

If you want an even more comfortable J45, try out the J45 Studio. It has a slightly thinner body, and is super comfortable to play for a dread.
__________________
Eastman E1SS-SB
Eastman PCH1-OM-CLA
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-18-2019, 11:29 PM
ii Cybershot ii ii Cybershot ii is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kcnbys View Post
If you want an even more comfortable J45, try out the J45 Studio. It has a slightly thinner body, and is super comfortable to play for a dread.
Yea those look cool.

Since you have both a DN3 and a J45, how do they compare comfort-wise for you?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-19-2019, 08:42 AM
kcnbys kcnbys is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Slinger, WI
Posts: 2,055
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ii Cybershot ii View Post
Yea those look cool.

Since you have both a DN3 and a J45, how do they compare comfort-wise for you?
The J45 is more comfortable. I don't have any problem with the comfort of the DN3, but the J45 with the thinner body and short scale is definitely a bit more comfortable.
__________________
Eastman E1SS-SB
Eastman PCH1-OM-CLA
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-19-2019, 08:50 AM
Guest 728
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My LG2 American Eagle gives me that great Gibson tone without the shoulder discomfort of a full-size body. I traded my J-35 for it and never looked back.

Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=