The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-08-2002, 03:37 AM
niteguy niteguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2
Default Anyone with a Eric Clapton Signature Model-Martin Guitar?

Gosh, it's too expensive to own one. Is there anyone out there one a limited edition of EC Signature model? How does it sound? What about the playability? Been dreaming to get one of this but it's too far from reality

Last edited by niteguy; 05-08-2002 at 07:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-08-2002, 10:44 AM
mtnbrz mtnbrz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Evergreen State
Posts: 236
Default

I played one and was unimpressed. both my 614 and 814 can blow this thing away, both in sound and playability. And I don't usually mind the Martin sound, although it is a little to dull for me. IMHO, the 314 is a much better sounding guitar.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-08-2002, 03:56 PM
worshipvertical worshipvertical is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 2,017
Default

martins are all overpriced IMHO
__________________
Chris McKee

Go SPURS Go
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-09-2002, 11:28 PM
brettster brettster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 103
Default

i had full intentions of buying one untill i played the sucker,
it was so awfull i asked the guy to change the strings .
even after that,
i thought it played liike a cheap guitar,
didnt sound special either.
walked out of the shop with my money.
dosnt even compare to my 514
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-15-2002, 07:07 PM
Tony Mig. Tony Mig. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cow Pens Island, New Jersey
Posts: 70
Default

I played one too, and thought it was one of the worst Martin's I ever held in my hands. The action was so high, it was painful to play, and the sound didn't impress me either.
I know of two people that own them, and they swear buy them, one guy even had a Collins and a Goodall, and always said the Martin 000-28EC blew the other two away. Perhaps he found a gem out of a bunch of dogs, or he's ego won't allow him to admitt he paid all that money for a piece of junk with Eric Clapton's name on it.......
Either way, IMO it's not one of Martin's better efforts.
I've tried many Martin guitars, and found the whole line to be a hit or miss ordeal. I'd have to say that it's been a 60 / 40 split, 60% of the Martins I've played sucked, and 40% of them were definitely worth the money. It's one guitar that I'd never buy mail order.........
__________________
Phat Tony from Joisey
Taylor 314
Takamine "G" series
Gibson ES-335
Fender American Vintage '52 RI Telecaster
Fender Custom Shop(1960 NOS) Stratocaster
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-16-2002, 12:56 PM
tbondo's Avatar
tbondo tbondo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Merritt Island, FL
Posts: 2,813
Default

played one in Nashville, and it was a pretty good guitar...good action, good sound.....didn't come home with me, but it was one of the best Martins that I have ever played, very big sound for such a small guitar...as Tony Mig said, and I agree, the Martins are very uneven in terms of sound...I would never buy a Martin without playing first...and, the OOM-18EC (is that what it was?) didn't even come close to my 510 or K14C....my 414RCE was the closest in terms of sound and playability, and I'll admit the Martin was a bit better....I think that particular guitar (414RCE) is about to be my son's possession, as I need room in my playing schedule for my planned Taylorstock 912 or Goodall GC.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-16-2002, 11:43 PM
tenthumbs tenthumbs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,080
Default

Just played one at my local GC. Nothing wrong with it at all. Sounds great but it's pricey. I like the look of it also.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-30-2002, 07:38 PM
712jhp 712jhp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 20
Default

I've played one each at two different local stores. Both sounded fabulous. They don't sound anything like a Taylor -- they're moodier, a little more blues-y, a bit richer, without the distinctive brightness of Taylors. I happen to think it's a great sound, but if you define "good sound" as "just like a Taylor" you might be disappointed.

In general, "fresh-from-the-factory" action tends to be higher on new Martins than on new Taylors, but both of these had action comparable to that on my Taylor. The neck width is 1-11/16, a bit tighter than Taylor's standard 1-3/4; this can be good or bad depending on your playing style.

All in all, a great guitar, if a bit pricey.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-30-2002, 09:53 PM
cpmusic's Avatar
cpmusic cpmusic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 10,967
Default

I agree with 712jhp. I've played a couple of these guitars and they were excellent -- not at all like a Taylor GA, but just what they're purported to be. I'll also add that most Guitar Centers are the last places you'll want to try these or any other premium Martins unless they're kept in a case. They get more use than most other guitars in the acoustic room, and their strings go dead in a hurry as a result.

There are also different levels of EC models, some of which list for about the same as an 814ce. Many of Martin's signature models are pricey, but their standard models are pretty reasonable, all else being equal. The list prices of the 810 and HD-28 (both rosewood/Sitka dreads) are within about $50 of each other, and the D-28's list is about 15% less.

Of course, no guitar is worth the price if you don't like it. Given the choice, I'd probably lean toward the 810 even for a little bit more, but that's strictly a matter of preference. Someone who prefers the HD-28's tone wouldn't be spending too much to buy the Martin.
__________________
Chris
We all do better when we all do better.

Last edited by cpmusic; 05-30-2002 at 11:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-31-2002, 09:47 AM
712jhp 712jhp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 20
Default

One thing I forgot to mention, on the subject of playability: the EC has what Martin calls a "short scale", 24.9" from nut to bridge, rather than 25.5". Obviously, this puts the frets a little closer together, but more importantly, it means the strings come up to pitch at a lower tension. This results in a "softer" feel that a lot of finger-style players prefer. Flat-pickers, on the other hand, tend not to like the short scale because the strings oscillate more at the lower tension, so they can't whale on the strings as hard as they might like without running into buzzing.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-31-2002, 10:55 AM
cpmusic's Avatar
cpmusic cpmusic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 10,967
Default

Just FYI, the 24.9" scale is the standard spec on regular issue 000 Martins at or above the Standard series, and I think it's the only model size that has the shorter scale. Even the OM, which is the same body, has a 25.4" scale. It gets a little confusing to keep after it, because there are so many variations on each Martin model.

The lower priced 000s, including the 000-15 and 000-15S (12-fret model), have the 25.4" scale.
__________________
Chris
We all do better when we all do better.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-08-2002, 03:04 PM
Shemp Shemp is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 161
Default

The Clapton model is a fabulous guitar. Like all Martins, it comes from the factory with action that is pretty high. Strong players like it, because it maximizes the tone of the guitar, but causes you to work a bit more. Taylor sets its action very low at the factory, which makes the guitar play like buttah, but does compromise the tone imho.

You can easily have the action lowered by having the saddle shaved a touch.

That said, it will not sound like any Taylor model currently available. It will be less treble and upper mid oriented and more woody/bass oriented. The first thing that goes as people age is their ability to hear the upper registers. It might explain why many older players here like the Taylor sound. It emphasizes the frequencies that they have the hardest time hearing.

It's a great guitar. People who say it isn't are simply showing their prejudice. The best way to judge is to play a few and see if they speak to you.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-10-2002, 08:10 PM
jmintzer jmintzer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Potomac, MD USA
Posts: 619
Default

I love the sound of the guitar, but the 'V'-shaped neck didn't feel right in my hands when i played it. Maybe it just takes some getting used t sinve I loved the sound so much. Maybe someday...

James
__________________
Gear Page
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=