#181
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#182
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#183
|
|||
|
|||
I wanted to post some photos of my Jumbo, but I got too involved in playing to take the time to take any pictures. Then I made some efforts, and discovered that the African Blackwood is nearly impossible to photograph without my prominent reflection making it into a "selfie". After a number of attempts, I managed some halfway decent photographs.
Last edited by mhw48; 01-18-2021 at 01:19 PM. |
#184
|
||||
|
||||
Beautiful guitar...
Try taking it outside in bright sunshine (example below)
__________________
A bunch of nice archtops, flattops, a gypsy & nylon strings… |
#185
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks, that's a good idea, I'll give it a try. (and your example is also a beautiful guitar!)
|
#186
|
||||
|
||||
|
#187
|
||||
|
||||
Yes it is...
__________________
A bunch of nice archtops, flattops, a gypsy & nylon strings… |
#188
|
||||
|
||||
I’m reviving the thread for a one year update….
|
#189
|
|||
|
|||
I am really loving my Franklin Jumbo. When I first got the guitar, the bass was pretty impressive but it somewhat overshadowed the trebles. Since then the guitar has loosened up and really sparkles. It is now very well balanced from top to bottom.
I am not good at all at describing how a guitar sounds (My efforts remind me of my attempts to write book reports in second grade: "The book was nice! I liked it!") but I'll give it a go... The jumbo is different from my Franklin Dread, which initially surprised me, then made me appreciate their differences. The Dread might actually be the louder of the two and maybe a bit warmer, (or maybe just a bit more "woody" due to the mahogany) while the Jumbo has a more "glassy" and complex sound. It might seem like a contradiction, but while the Jumbo has more overtones, the notes also seem more focused at the same time, perhaps due to the shallower depth of the body. When I'm playing, the guitar just feels alive. Nick builds a magical instrument! Speaking of Nick, Fretboard Journal published an interesting piece on him: https://www.fretboardjournal.com/fea...lin-guitar-co/ Last edited by mhw48; 01-22-2023 at 07:16 PM. |
#190
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for both the update on your guitar and for the link to the FJ article on Nick. My Franklin OMC gets better and better (it is 3-1/2 years old now) . I owe him a call but with the nocturnal hours that he keeps, it is hard to stay in touch?
__________________
A bunch of nice archtops, flattops, a gypsy & nylon strings… |
#191
|
||||
|
||||
Ha, in fact, I had just read the FBJ article and scoured every shop I could think of to find a used non-cutaway Jumbo. I’ve always wanted one as I learned blues guitar through Stefan Grossman’s CDs and DVDs. I think I own maybe 60! I bought a Martin HJ-38 SG but the dreadnaught depth was too muddy for me. I think Nick’s Jumbo would be perfect, although I remembered iim7V7IM7 has a 16” OM which made me re-read this thread.
Jeanne tells me Nick is still working on relocating and fixing up his shop a bit, but he's getting my D-28 next month for its 44-year-old tuneup. My 1989 OM-5 and my 1980 OM-28 remain forever guitars...and I'm a mahogany guy (though I'm forever set with my vintage Martins) but I think a Mahogany, Koa, Maple, or some sort of more fundamental Jumbo may be in my future. But, dang, I love what he does with Brazilian. We'll have to see. I'm glad you're enjoying your Jumbo. |
#192
|
||||
|
||||
FYI, Nick’s OMC model is 15-5/8” at the lower bout and not 16”. He enlarged an OM (15”) to the add body volume lost to the cutaway. He also added 1/8” to the body depth over an OM. So the lower bout is similar to a Dreadnought in width with a narrower waste like an OM and less end block depth (4-1/4” vs. 4-7/8”).
Quote:
__________________
A bunch of nice archtops, flattops, a gypsy & nylon strings… |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
His guitars do just seem to get better and better as they age! Last edited by mhw48; 01-22-2023 at 02:15 PM. |