The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Build and Repair

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #91  
Old 10-19-2013, 11:22 PM
Sam VanLaningham Sam VanLaningham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 1,236
Default

Cool! I know you are looking for answers but I got questions! Did you radius braces and use 3x5 card trick? If so how'd it go?

Also, why are there distinct gaps between bridge plate and braces, braces and other braces etc? Ok nice progress.

Sam
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 10-20-2013, 06:52 AM
clinchriver clinchriver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 265
Default

It very well braced, Why is the bridge plate skewed away from the X bracing and tone bar? Curious?
Also you have to get one finished and decide what you will do differently on #2.
I just strung up #3 and its quite a progression. Good Luck.
__________________
Andersonville Tennessee
Clinch River Instruments, White Oak O, 13 fret Nick Lucas, 1937 spec D-18
Martin 000-28 EC
Gibson Les Paul
Gibson 335 Dot
Bunch of Strats
Fender B-Bender Tele
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 10-20-2013, 10:20 AM
Steven Bollman Steven Bollman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Left of Sam View Post
Cool! I know you are looking for answers but I got questions! Did you radius braces and use 3x5 card trick? If so how'd it go?

Also, why are there distinct gaps between bridge plate and braces, braces and other braces etc? Ok nice progress.

Sam
Hi LoS, I actually used staggered wooden door shims. They seemed to work well when a few are staggered. My radius was tight (12' is what the design called for) so I found the larger stack of cards a bit fiddly. As for brace placement, again, just following the plans.
__________________
Guitars: J-45 copy, Stahl Style 6 inspired copy
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 10-20-2013, 10:41 AM
Steven Bollman Steven Bollman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clinchriver View Post
It very well braced, Why is the bridge plate skewed away from the X bracing and tone bar? Curious?
Also you have to get one finished and decide what you will do differently on #2.
I just strung up #3 and its quite a progression. Good Luck.
Hi clinchriver. The bridge plate is skewed according to the plan. I suppose I will make a second. I have some sinker honduran mahogany and old lutz spruce for the next one.
__________________
Guitars: J-45 copy, Stahl Style 6 inspired copy
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 10-20-2013, 11:59 AM
Howard Klepper Howard Klepper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Earthly Paradise of Northern California
Posts: 6,634
Default

Your plan differs a lot from the way I build; I can't really critique it. You are going to clean up the glue excess, right? That is more easily done before it hardens.

I see that you routed all the way through the top for part of your rosette. Get that entirely backed up or it will some day open up. A thin spruce layer will do.
__________________
"Still a man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest."
--Paul Simon

Last edited by Howard Klepper; 10-20-2013 at 12:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 10-20-2013, 01:39 PM
Steven Bollman Steven Bollman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Klepper View Post
Your plan differs a lot from the way I build; I can't really critique it. You are going to clean up the glue excess, right? That is more easily done before it hardens.

I see that you routed all the way through the top for part of your rosette. Get that entirely backed up or it will some day open up. A thin spruce layer will do.
Mistakes were made... My router depth slipped more than I thought. As I did some additional thinning if the top I broke through in a few spots. I was wondering if I should patch it. Thx for suggesting that. My experience with hhg is with this guitar. I got some tips on how to prepare it, but I didn't realize how tough it is to clean up after it dries. There is a lot of learning happening in this first build.
__________________
Guitars: J-45 copy, Stahl Style 6 inspired copy
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 10-20-2013, 05:04 PM
Sam VanLaningham Sam VanLaningham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 1,236
Default

Hey Steven, Howard et al - so I've seen some people shellac insides. Then I've read some people use HHG as seal coat. Why not "seal" the inside of the top with HHG to make it uniform? Obviously I know next to nothing/ enough to screw up, but it's a thought I've been having for my own build.

Sam
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 10-21-2013, 11:42 AM
Steven Bollman Steven Bollman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Left of Sam View Post
Hey Steven, Howard et al - so I've seen some people shellac insides. Then I've read some people use HHG as seal coat. Why not "seal" the inside of the top with HHG to make it uniform? Obviously I know next to nothing/ enough to screw up, but it's a thought I've been having for my own build.

Sam
Hi LoS,

I have seen photos of what you are talking about, but I don't know anything it. I am in the process of scraping the glue off.
__________________
Guitars: J-45 copy, Stahl Style 6 inspired copy
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 10-21-2013, 12:03 PM
Sam VanLaningham Sam VanLaningham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 1,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Bollman View Post
Hi LoS,

I have seen photos of what you are talking about, but I don't know anything it. I am in the process of scraping the glue off.
Just as an FYI, I scoured the forum and internet in general and learned the following:

- Mcknight shellacs insides.
- klepper tried it for awhile but no longer does it.
- Sexauer wonders why anyone would do it (I paraphrase).
- John Arnold sometimes does it (I think).

Some believe it might help to mitigate humidity issues. Some believe it might change tone. You might have already gleaned all this info as well but whateva!

Sam
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 10-21-2013, 12:43 PM
Steven Bollman Steven Bollman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Left of Sam View Post
Just as an FYI, I scoured the forum and internet in general and learned the following:

- Mcknight shellacs insides.
- klepper tried it for awhile but no longer does it.
- Sexauer wonders why anyone would do it (I paraphrase).
- John Arnold sometimes does it (I think).

Some believe it might help to mitigate humidity issues. Some believe it might change tone. You might have already gleaned all this info as well but whateva!

Sam
Thx for the casual survey! It's interesting. At the moment, I'll leave it bare, but explore the pros and cons.
__________________
Guitars: J-45 copy, Stahl Style 6 inspired copy
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 10-21-2013, 12:53 PM
Rodger Knox Rodger Knox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Baltimore, Md.
Posts: 2,431
Default

Shellac is not an effective moisture barrier, it does slow the change in moisture content of the wood in response to humidity changes, but it does not prevent it. Protection against humidity changes is limited.

The argument against shellacing the inside of the box is that it makes future repairs more difficult.

There doesn't seem to me to be any compelling reasons to favor shellac or no shellac inside the box.
__________________
Rodger Knox, PE
1917 Martin 0-28
1956 Gibson J-50
et al
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 10-21-2013, 04:42 PM
Steven Bollman Steven Bollman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 596
Default Back thickness

The back thickness (Brazilian Rosewood) called for in the plan is mostly running around 2.0-2.2mm (some areas as low as 1.7 and as high as 2.4mm). Is that reasonable? Is it significantly more fragile at that thickness. I have currently hand planed it to a pretty consistent 2.75mm thick. I thought I would take a pause and see if there's any prevailing wisdom about the final thickness. Thx.
__________________
Guitars: J-45 copy, Stahl Style 6 inspired copy
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 11-02-2013, 12:28 AM
Steven Bollman Steven Bollman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 596
Default

Even though I haven't posted lately, I have been busy working away on the guitar. Here I am thicknessing (thinning) the back plate.



Here's what the back plate looks like with the braces glued on but not yet shaped.


These handy tools are good for radiusing the edges of the braces.


Shaped braces. Still some fine tuning to do...


Outtards


Innards






__________________
Guitars: J-45 copy, Stahl Style 6 inspired copy
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 11-02-2013, 07:24 PM
Sam VanLaningham Sam VanLaningham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 1,236
Default

looking good to this novice! Seems like the top has a lot of brace mass yes?

Cool and nice progress. Sam
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 11-02-2013, 10:42 PM
Howard Klepper Howard Klepper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Earthly Paradise of Northern California
Posts: 6,634
Default

Why are you ending the back crossgrain strip at the braces instead of continuing to the neck and tail blocks?
__________________
"Still a man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest."
--Paul Simon
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Build and Repair






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=